[Suggestion] Restructure package folder? #162

Activity

1. jan-janssen commented on Jan 20, 2026

   

   jan-janssen

   on Jan 20, 2026

   Member

   More actions

   Hi @XzzX ,

   • I agree that the workflow engine specific part should ideally be included in the workflow engines. At the moment it is primarily included in this repository to enable faster iteration of the Python Workflow Definition.
   • Simply for historic reasons - pydantic classes were only added later on Add pydantic validation #97
   • I agree it makes sense to separate the JSON writer to a separate module.

   While I am not exactly sure how we want to address the first issue, the second and third could be address directly. Feel free to open a corresponding pull request.
2. jan-janssen

   changed the title [-]Restructure package folder?[/-] [+][Suggestion] Restructure package folder?[/+] on Jan 20, 2026
3. XzzX commented on Jan 21, 2026

   

   XzzX

   on Jan 21, 2026

   Author

   More actions

   These are API breaking changes. Is that ok?
4. jan-janssen commented on Jan 21, 2026

   

   jan-janssen

   on Jan 21, 2026

   Member

   More actions

   These are API breaking changes. Is that ok?

   I guess we have to properly increase the version but as long as the JOSN format remains the same, I am fine. I think the main focus at the moment is on maintaining backwards compatibility to exported workflows.