Skip to content

add pathlib.Path.walk method #90385

Closed
Closed

Description

@Ovsyanka83
mannequin
BPO 46227
Nosy @merwok, @barneygale, @ajoino, @Ovsyanka83
PRs
  • bpo-46227: Add pathlib.Path.walk method #30340
  • Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.

    Show more details

    GitHub fields:

    assignee = None
    closed_at = None
    created_at = <Date 2022-01-02.18:34:12.724>
    labels = ['type-feature', 'library', '3.11']
    title = 'add pathlib.Path.walk method'
    updated_at = <Date 2022-01-08.12:58:28.255>
    user = 'https://github.com/Ovsyanka83'

    bugs.python.org fields:

    activity = <Date 2022-01-08.12:58:28.255>
    actor = 'Ovsyanka'
    assignee = 'none'
    closed = False
    closed_date = None
    closer = None
    components = ['Library (Lib)']
    creation = <Date 2022-01-02.18:34:12.724>
    creator = 'Ovsyanka'
    dependencies = []
    files = []
    hgrepos = []
    issue_num = 46227
    keywords = ['patch']
    message_count = 4.0
    messages = ['409511', '409514', '409994', '410098']
    nosy_count = 4.0
    nosy_names = ['eric.araujo', 'barneygale', 'ajoino', 'Ovsyanka']
    pr_nums = ['30340']
    priority = 'normal'
    resolution = None
    stage = 'patch review'
    status = 'open'
    superseder = None
    type = 'enhancement'
    url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue46227'
    versions = ['Python 3.11']

    Activity

    1. Ovsyanka83 commented on Jan 2, 2022

      Ovsyanka83mannequin
      MannequinAuthor

      Pathlib is great, yet every time I have to parse a bunch of files, I have to use os.walk and join paths by hand. That's not a lot of code but I feel like pathlib should have higher-level abstractions for all path-related functionality of os. I propose we add a Path.walk method that could look like this:

      def walk(self, topdown=True, onerror=None, followlinks=False):
          for root, dirs, files in self._accessor.walk(
              self,
              topdown=topdown,
              onerror=onerror,
              followlinks=followlinks
          ):
              root_path = Path(root)
              yield (
                  root_path,
                  [root_path._make_child_relpath(dir_) for dir_ in dirs],
                  [root_path._make_child_relpath(file) for file in files],
              )

      Note: this version does not handle a situation when top does not exist (similar to os.walk that also doesn't handle it and just returns an empty generator)

    2. added
      3.11only security fixes
      stdlibStandard Library Python modules in the Lib/ directory
      type-featureA feature request or enhancement
      on Jan 2, 2022
    3. Ovsyanka83 commented on Jan 2, 2022

      Ovsyanka83mannequin
      MannequinAuthor

      Some people could suggest using Path.glob instead but I found it to be less convenient for some use cases and generally slower (~2.7 times slower).

      >>> timeit("list(Path('Lib').walk())", number=100, globals=globals())
      1.9074640140170231
      >>> timeit("list(Path('Lib').glob('**/*'))", number=100, globals=globals())
      5.14890358998673
    4. merwok commented on Jan 7, 2022

      @merwok
      Member

      The idea is interesting, and I agree that glob with a maxi wildcard is not a great solution. There is discussion on the PR about adding walk vs extending iterdir; could you post a message on discuss.python.org and sum up the the discussion? (Pull requests on the CPython repo are only used to discuss implementation, not for debating ideas or proposing features.)

    5. Ovsyanka83 commented on Jan 8, 2022

      Ovsyanka83mannequin
      MannequinAuthor

      Thanks for the tip! Hopefully, I created it correctly:
      https://discuss.python.org/t/add-pathlib-path-walk-method/

      It is currently on review.

    6. transferred this issue fromon Apr 10, 2022
    7. zmievsa commented on May 8, 2022

      @zmievsa
      Contributor

      The discussion ended on the following decisions:

      • The original solution was based on wrapping os.walk but we have decided that it will be both faster and better in the long term to reimplement it (though I was not able to come up with any implementation that is significantly better than that of os.walk so it's 99% the same)
      • The original solution was yielding a tuple[Path, list[Path], list[Path]] but we decided to stay true to the original implementation and yield tuple[Path, list[str], list[str]]. It is both better in terms of optimization and should cause a little less confusion to the users
      • The original solution had the same arguments as os.walk but the interface was too convoluted so: we decided to rename arguments to snake-case and I decided to remove topdown argument by splitting walk into two methods. So we get walk() and walk_bottom_up(). I.e. Now we get two methods instead of one but with two modes of operation. The naming of methods is up to discussion because I myself am not very happy with these names but those are the best I found

      I have been absent for quite some time so the pull request got stale and outdated so I'm opening a new one.

    8. brettcannon commented on Jul 8, 2022

      @brettcannon
      Member

      The views on the change seem generally positive and the API seems like it makes sense, so I'm inclined to accept the change once the PR passes review.

    9. 4 remaining items

    10. reopened this on Jul 23, 2022
    11. added 2 commits that reference this issue on Jul 23, 2022
    12. added this to IDLE Issues and removed this from IDLE Issueson Jul 23, 2022
    13. zmievsa commented on Jul 24, 2022

      @zmievsa
      Contributor

      @tiran I apologize for introducing this problem and I am really thankful to you for resolving it, especially so quickly!

    14. merwok commented on Jul 24, 2022

      @merwok
      Member

      No worry! We all forgot to run the PR through buildbots before merging, so let’s just do that next time.

    15. brettcannon commented on Jul 25, 2022

      @brettcannon
      Member

      It's also partially my fault by forgetting that WASI doesn't support symlinks and thus to have you add the test guard for those sorts of platforms.

    16. zmievsa commented on Jul 26, 2022

      @zmievsa
      Contributor

      By the way, are we adding this PR into what's new? Or is it only gonna be a part of changelog? Seems big enough for what's new

    17. brettcannon commented on Jul 26, 2022

      @brettcannon
      Member

      @Ovsyanka83 it should end up in What's New. If you would like to write a PR for that I will happily review it. We also go through the changelog before release to make sure everything relevant ends up in there, so we don't have to worry about it being missed.

    18. added 3 commits that reference this issue on Jul 30, 2022
    19. added a commit that references this issue on Aug 11, 2022
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Labels

    3.11only security fixesstdlibStandard Library Python modules in the Lib/ directorytopic-pathlibtype-featureA feature request or enhancement

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions