Skip to content

Fix grammar in troubleshoot.rst #8527

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
sklam merged 2 commits into from
Oct 25, 2022
Merged

Fix grammar in troubleshoot.rst #8527

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
612a45c
Fix grammar in troubleshoot.rst
armgabrielyan Oct 21, 2022
042fbda
Wrap lines to 80 chars
armgabrielyan Oct 25, 2022
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Next Next commit
Fix grammar in troubleshoot.rst
  • Loading branch information
@armgabrielyan
armgabrielyan authored Oct 21, 2022
commit 612a45cda0cc1add5dc16964bb7ddf8a052fedae
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions docs/source/user/troubleshoot.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -797,7 +797,7 @@ the line in which the access violation occurred is printed.

Continuing the example as a debugging session demonstration, first ``index``
can be printed, and it is evidently 1e9. Printing ``c`` shows that it is a
structure, so the type needs looking up and it can be seen that is it an
structure, so the type needs looking up and it can be seen that it is an
``array(float64, 1d, C)`` type. Given the segfault came from an invalid access
it would be informative to check the number of items in the array and compare
that to the index requested. Inspecting the ``nitems`` member of the structure
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -874,7 +874,7 @@ breakpoint was hit, and after a ``continue`` was issued, it broke again at line
Debugging in parallel regions
-----------------------------

The follow example is quite involved, it executes with ``gdb`` instrumentation
The following example is quite involved, it executes with ``gdb`` instrumentation

@stuartarchibald stuartarchibald Oct 24, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please could this be line wrapped to 80 characters? Many thanks.

@armgabrielyan armgabrielyan Oct 25, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the comment! I have made the appropriate changes. Could you please check it out?

from the outset as per the example above, but it also uses threads and makes use
of the breakpoint functionality. Further, the last iteration of the parallel
section calls the function ``work``, which is actually just a binding to
Expand Down