You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
⚠️This is an automated status report. Do not assign this issue to a Copilot agent.
Overview
Processed 2 eligible PRs from the compact candidate set. No new nudges were posted because both PRs are in active sous-chef cooldown after recent bot comments that already mention @copilot.
⚠️This is an automated status report. Do not assign this issue to a Copilot agent.
Overview
Processed the current non-draft PR candidate set and applied backup skip rules. No new nudges were posted in this run because four PRs are still in sous-chef cooldown / already have a latest sous-chef @copilot comment, and the remaining PR already has a newer author follow-up after the last sous-chef nudge.
Maintainers can review the newest author/copilot follow-ups once current cooldown windows expire. PR #65069 appears closest to actionable review because the contributor already replied after the last sous-chef prompt.
Generated by 👨🍳 PR Sous Chef · pi · gpt54 · 24.4 AIC · ⌖ 8.51 AIC · ⊞ 9.2K · ◷ Comment /souschef to run again
⚠️This is an automated status report. Do not assign this issue to a Copilot agent.
Overview
Processed 2 eligible open PRs from the compact candidate set and nudged 2 of them. No PRs were skipped by the backup skip rules, no formatter pushes were produced, and no action-required workflow approvals were needed.
Formatter step could not check out either PR branch from this credential-free partial checkout without triggering promisor-remote object fetches, so no make fmt push was produced.
gh api graphql returned {"data":null} in this environment for review-thread queries, so no review threads were resolved and no stale github-actions[bot] reviews were dismissed.
Maintainers can inspect the two nudged PRs first; #65069 has an addressed-but-still-open review thread, while #65136 has multiple outstanding review comments plus failing checks on the current head.
Generated by 👨🍳 PR Sous Chef · pi · gpt54 · 58.6 AIC · ⌖ 8.77 AIC · ⊞ 9.9K · ◷ Comment /souschef to run again
⚠️This is an automated status report. Do not assign this issue to a Copilot agent.
Overview
Processed 5 eligible open non-draft PR candidates from the compact queue. Two PRs were nudged and had stale github-actions[bot] blocking reviews dismissed after confirming there were no unresolved review threads. Three PRs were skipped because they still had short-running checks in progress.
⚠️This is an automated status report. Do not assign this issue to a Copilot agent.
Overview
Processed 4 eligible PRs from the compact candidate set. Two PRs were skipped because short-running checks were still in progress, and two PRs received fresh PR Sous Chef nudges plus branch-update attempts.
Review-thread resolution and stale-review dismissal were not attempted because GraphQL reviewThreads.nodes data was unavailable from this session, so no valid PRRT_... thread IDs could be emitted safely
Recommendations
Maintainers can inspect the two nudged PRs first. The skipped PRs should be reconsidered after their active checks finish.
Generated by 👨🍳 PR Sous Chef · pi · gpt54 · 91.8 AIC · ⌖ 8.59 AIC · ⊞ 9.9K · ◷ Comment /souschef to run again
⚠️This is an automated status report. Do not assign this issue to a Copilot agent.
Overview
Processed 5 candidate PRs from the compact queue. No new @copilot nudge comments were posted this run: two PRs were skipped because checks were still running, one was skipped by the 30-minute sous-chef cooldown, and the remaining two did not need an additional forward-progress comment after branch-refresh attempts.
Critical information
Counter
Value
processed
5
skipped_checks_running
2
skipped_last_comment_from_sous_chef
0
skipped_cooldown
1
zero_diff_stalled
0
nudged
0
branch_update_attempts
3
formatter_pushes
0
approved_workflow_runs
0
merge_main_scheduled
0
resolved_review_threads
0
dismissed_reviews
0
Recommendations
Keep watching the two active-check PRs after their current runs finish. Revisit PR #65069 after the sous-chef cooldown expires if its unresolved review thread still needs safe-output cleanup.
Formatter/push step could not run on eligible branches because the local checkout is partial and branch checkout attempted to materialize missing objects from the remote, which is unavailable in this environment.
Review-thread resolution and stale-review dismissal were not attempted because GraphQL review-thread reads were denied in this session, so no safe thread IDs could be obtained.
Generated by 👨🍳 PR Sous Chef · pi · gpt54 · 81.2 AIC · ⌖ 8.71 AIC · ⊞ 10.1K · ◷ Comment /souschef to run again
⚠️This is an automated status report. Do not assign this issue to a Copilot agent.
Overview
Processed 2 open non-draft PR candidates from the compact queue and nudged 2 for forward progress. Both PRs received a branch-update attempt plus a single consolidated @copilot nudge comment aimed at making maintainer follow-up faster.
No action-required CJS/CGO/CWI workflow approvals were needed from the compact candidate data.
Formatter pushes were skipped: checking out the PR branches locally required promisor/remote object materialization in this credential-free environment.
Review-thread auto-resolution and stale-review dismissal were not attempted because the required GraphQL reviewThreads query returned data: null, so no safe PRRT_... thread IDs were available.
Recommendations
Maintainers should inspect PR #65340 for the exported GetLogParserBootstrap API-removal concern and PR #65165 for dirty-branch / stale-blocking-review cleanup after the latest author responses.
Generated by 👨🍳 PR Sous Chef · pi · gpt54 · 57.7 AIC · ⌖ 8.7 AIC · ⊞ 9.9K · ◷ Comment /souschef to run again
Activity
github-actions commentedon Oct 3, 2026
pr-sous-chefNudged PRs
github-actions commentedon Oct 3, 2026
Nudged PRs
github-actions commentedon Oct 3, 2026
Overview
Processed the current non-draft PR candidate set and applied backup skip rules. No new nudges were posted in this run because four PRs are still in sous-chef cooldown / already have a latest sous-chef
@copilotcomment, and the remaining PR already has a newer author follow-up after the last sous-chef nudge.Critical Information
Processed PR details
@copilotnudge and still within cooldown.@copilotnudge and still within cooldown.@copilotnudge and still within cooldown.@copilotnudge and still within cooldown.copilot-swe-agentafter the previous sous-chef nudge; unresolved review context remains at#discussion_r4168275489.Recommendations
Maintainers can review the newest author/copilot follow-ups once current cooldown windows expire. PR #65069 appears closest to actionable review because the contributor already replied after the last sous-chef prompt.
github-actions commentedon Oct 3, 2026
Overview
Processed 2 eligible open PRs from the compact candidate set and nudged 2 of them. No PRs were skipped by the backup skip rules, no formatter pushes were produced, and no action-required workflow approvals were needed.
Critical information
Nudged PRs
Details
make fmtpush was produced.gh api graphqlreturned{"data":null}in this environment for review-thread queries, so no review threads were resolved and no stalegithub-actions[bot]reviews were dismissed.Recommendations
Maintainers can inspect the two nudged PRs first; #65069 has an addressed-but-still-open review thread, while #65136 has multiple outstanding review comments plus failing checks on the current head.
github-actions commentedon Oct 3, 2026
Overview
Processed 5 eligible open non-draft PR candidates from the compact queue. Two PRs were nudged and had stale
github-actions[bot]blocking reviews dismissed after confirming there were no unresolved review threads. Three PRs were skipped because they still had short-running checks in progress.Critical information
Nudged PRs
Skipped PRs
agentin progress)copilotin progress)copilotin progress)Additional details
update_pull_requestfor both nudged PRs.53986994455398657802Recommendations
Maintainers can focus first on PRs #65208 and #65199 after Copilot responds. Revisit #65165, #65136, and #65069 once their in-flight checks finish.
github-actions commentedon Oct 3, 2026
Overview
Processed 4 eligible PRs from the compact candidate set. Two PRs were skipped because short-running checks were still in progress, and two PRs received fresh PR Sous Chef nudges plus branch-update attempts.
Critical information
Nudged PRs
Skipped / limitations
copilotcheck in progress, started 2026-10-03T03:37:23Z)copilotcheck in progress, started 2026-10-03T03:39:54Z)reviewThreads.nodesdata was unavailable from this session, so no validPRRT_...thread IDs could be emitted safelyRecommendations
Maintainers can inspect the two nudged PRs first. The skipped PRs should be reconsidered after their active checks finish.
github-actions commentedon Oct 3, 2026
Overview
Processed 5 candidate PRs from the compact queue. No new
@copilotnudge comments were posted this run: two PRs were skipped because checks were still running, one was skipped by the 30-minute sous-chef cooldown, and the remaining two did not need an additional forward-progress comment after branch-refresh attempts.Critical information
Recommendations
Keep watching the two active-check PRs after their current runs finish. Revisit PR #65069 after the sous-chef cooldown expires if its unresolved review thread still needs safe-output cleanup.
Processed PR outcomes
detection) started within the last hour.@copilotnudge posted because the latest response already reported branch refresh, resolved threads, and a completedpr-finisherpass.@copilotnudge posted because there was no concrete review/check failure to unblock.copilot) started within the last hour.Limitations and skipped follow-up actions
github-actions commentedon Oct 3, 2026
Overview
Processed 2 open non-draft PR candidates from the compact queue and nudged 2 for forward progress. Both PRs received a branch-update attempt plus a single consolidated
@copilotnudge comment aimed at making maintainer follow-up faster.Critical Information
Nudged PRs
Execution details
CJS/CGO/CWIworkflow approvals were needed from the compact candidate data.reviewThreadsquery returneddata: null, so no safePRRT_...thread IDs were available.Recommendations
Maintainers should inspect PR #65340 for the exported
GetLogParserBootstrapAPI-removal concern and PR #65165 for dirty-branch / stale-blocking-review cleanup after the latest author responses.github-actions commentedon Oct 4, 2026
This issue is being closed as outdated. A newer issue has been created: #65535
View newer issue
This action was performed automatically by the
PR Sous Chefworkflow.