Jump to content

User talk:Qwerfjkl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
Special Barnstar
Short Description Barnstar
Special Barnstar
Articles for Creation Barnstar
Team Barnstar
Short Description Barnstar
Reviewer Barnstar
Team Barnstar
Hacker's Barnstar
Category Barnstar
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
This user has redirect autopatrolled pseudo-rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has new page reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 hours ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic October 2026 Administrator Elections – Discussion Phase

It is 9:55 AM where this user lives.


Qwerfjkl (bot) – Pandas_planes

[edit]

Page: Chicago_Fire_Department

Diff: Special:Diff/1376036778

I have changed the source but I don't think the bot did anything in the first place

Pandas planes (talk) 19:45, 21 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

sorry I did not mean to send it 2 times Pandas planes (talk) 19:47, 21 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Pandas planes, what do you mean [you] don't think the bot did anything in the first place? It notified you of the problem. — Qwerfjkltalk 17:32, 26 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
it said that it deleted the part I wrote,so I went to check and it did not do anything to the article Pandas planes (talk) 22:04, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Pandas planes, perhaps you misread "detected" as "deleted"? Qwerfjkltalk 09:38, 30 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
maybe Pandas planes (talk) 14:08, 30 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

"Copy nomination wikitext"

[edit]

Hello, re the MassXfD feature you added on my request, for me it throws the error "Uncaught TypeError: can't access property "toUpperCase", s[0] is undefined". 1234qwer1234qwer4 21:39, 22 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

1234qwer1234qwer4, what did you fill out the fields with? — Qwerfjkltalk 11:17, 24 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
I was adding these redirects, cf. Special:Diff/1376224506. 1234qwer1234qwer4 21:50, 24 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
1234qwer1234qwer4, okay, I see what the problem was. The logic was CFD-specific and it broke on RFD. I've changed how it works and it should work now (Special:Diff/1376692991). The copy button will take a bit longer to show because it needs to wait for authors for FFD and I'm too tried right now to handle that as an exception, so it waits on any XfD. — Qwerfjkltalk 18:22, 25 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

October 2026 Administrator Elections – Schedule

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:46, 26 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

October 2026 Administrator Elections – Schedule

[edit]
Copied from Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous) § October 2026 Administrator Elections – Schedule because this page is listed on Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Subscribe.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:46, 26 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Question from Muffinbutt1985 (02:14, 27 September 2026)

[edit]

Is it ok to name children if they’re dead? I’ve been going through my articles on jihadists and removing the names of their minor children to comply with Wikipedia’s policy. Since the policy is to protect the privacy of the children, is it all right to disclose their names if they are dead? Since dead people can’t get upset about privacy and have no futures to protect.

Several of the jihadists I’ve written about brought their kids to the Islamic State or gave birth in IS territory and some of the kids subsequently died of war-related causes. I view the children as being victims of ISIS. Right now I’m removing the names of living ones but leaving up the names of dead ones, is that ok?

An example would be https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomasa_P%C3%A9rez_Molleja who brought six kids in and three did not survive. --Muffinbutt1985 (talk) 02:14, 27 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Muffinbutt1985, I'm not familiar with Wikipedia's policy on naming children. can you link to it? I did a quick search but couldn't find it. — Qwerfjkltalk 14:56, 28 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
It’s in their living persons policy. Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons Muffinbutt1985 (talk) 14:58, 28 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Muffinbutt1985, I think you should ask at Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons for a more accurate response, but I think probably the children's names should still be omitted even if they are dead. — Qwerfjkltalk 15:05, 28 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-39

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 11:54, 27 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Qwerfjkl (bot) – Ceren_Ada

[edit]

Page: September_8

Diff: Special:Diff/1377038708

Comment/question:

Hello. There were no issues with the edits I made on September 8th—or at least, I wasn't aware of making any mistakes. I have been developing my skills in editing Wikipedia over time, though I may have made an error unintentionally. Did I make a mistake in one of the edits? If I did, please feel free to point it out. I don't know many languages. I did wonder if separating sources might have been an error, but I actually verify details—such as the person's dates of birth—individually across multiple sources. Could this perhaps be a misunderstanding? Ceren Ada (talk) 18:53, 27 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Ceren Ada, the author was given as "Author, jbugembe About"; it should be just "jbugembe". — Qwerfjkltalk 14:57, 28 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Question from Kingbelair (00:13, 28 September 2026)

[edit]

i want to nhelp someone publish his book in wikipedia --Kingbelair (talk) 00:13, 28 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Kingbelair, Wikipedia is not a place for self promotion. — Qwerfjkltalk 14:57, 28 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Question from Bamrxh (10:02, 28 September 2026)

[edit]

how to make a wiki page --Bamrxh (talk) 10:02, 28 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Bamrxh, Welcome! Creating a new article from scratch is extremely challenging, and new editors are strongly recommended to spend a few months learning how Wikipedia works first—perhaps through some of the tasks on your homepage—before trying it. If you're still interested in creating a new article, you are highly encouraged to read Help:Your first article. The first step is determining whether your topic meets our inclusion criteria by looking for coverage in independent, reliable sources with significant coverage. If you haven't already, also check out the tutorial; it's a lot of fun! Happy editing! — Qwerfjkltalk 14:57, 28 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-40

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 10:47, 28 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

October 2026 Administrator Elections – Call for Candidates

[edit]

The administrator elections process has officially started! Qualified editors are encouraged to find at least one experienced nominator. Self-nominations are also allowed. Please review instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2026/Candidates.

Here is the schedule:

  • September 29 – October 5: Nominations phase (we are here)
  • October 8–12: Discussion phase
  • October 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase

Please note the following:

  • The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed. However, in practice, few candidates succeed without ~10K edits, some content creation, no recent behavioral issues, and a nominator.
  • Prospective candidates are advised to become familiar with the community's expectations of administrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for admin elections candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
  • The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.
  • The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.
  • Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.

Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. Later, a user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.

If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

October 2026 Administrator Elections – Call for Candidates

[edit]
Copied from Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous) § October 2026 Administrator Elections – Call for Candidates because this page is listed on Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Subscribe.

The administrator elections process has officially started! Qualified editors are encouraged to find at least one experienced nominator. Self-nominations are also allowed. Please review instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2026/Candidates.

Here is the schedule:

  • September 29 – October 5: Nominations phase (we are here)
  • October 8–12: Discussion phase
  • October 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase

Please note the following:

  • The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed. However, in practice, few candidates succeed without ~10K edits, some content creation, no recent behavioral issues, and a nominator.
  • Prospective candidates are advised to become familiar with the community's expectations of administrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for admin elections candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
  • The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.
  • The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.
  • Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.

Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. Later, a user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.

If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Question from CuriousPussycat (17:32, 29 September 2026)

[edit]

I am wondering if my proposed paragraph has been reviewed. It is not yet on the active page and I have not been informed that it was not approved. My paragraph is intended to provide a careful counterpoint to the previous paragraph which is quite tendentious --CuriousPussycat (talk) 17:32, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

I suppose you mean this edit? It was reverted here with the edit summary Unsourced and poorly written. Qwerfjkltalk 09:45, 30 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Question from CuriousPussycat (11:12, 30 September 2026)

[edit]

Thank you for taking the time to reply regarding my edit on the entry for Sally Hemings. I believe I can fortify my arguments with proper citations. Upper level editors should review the blatant tendentiousness of the paragraph to which I was offering a counterbalance. The unsubstantiated imputed allegations against Jefferson are outrageous. As the president of the Thomas Jefferson Foundation noted, "We really can't know what the dynamic was" I also did not think that my writing was insufficient. I had to bullet point my arguments. --CuriousPussycat (talk) 11:12, 30 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

@CuriousPussycat, I suggest you discuss this at Talk:Sally Hemings. You say the allegations are unsubstantiated, but there are two references, whereas your paragraph had none. Also, don't you think that the president of the Thomas Jefferson may have some kind of bias? Qwerfjkltalk 17:16, 1 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Question from Chris270589 (13:14, 1 October 2026)

[edit]

wie erstelle ich eine webseite --Chris270589 (talk) 13:14, 1 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Chris270589, sprechen Sie Englisch? — Qwerfjkltalk 16:05, 2 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Question from Loganwikidude (21:12, 1 October 2026)

[edit]

How does this mentor stuff actually work --Loganwikidude (talk) 21:12, 1 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Loganwikidude, if you have any questions or problems (relating to Wikipedia), feel free to ask. — Qwerfjkltalk 16:03, 2 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Qwerfjkl (bot) – ~2026-53180-39

[edit]

?There is NOTHING wrong with my citation. It's the exact citation that the original creator(s) should have consulted!It's the freaking CENSUS BUREAU! This robotic nanny app is gibberish and poisonous. Wikipedia should get rid of it or fix it. As things now stand, it appears to exclude all official publications as citations because they are not published as work that is the product of a single author. W.t.h. was Wikipedia thinking ???


Page: Connellsville_Township,_Pennsylvania

Diff: Special:Diff/1378088481

Comment/question:

~2026-53180-39 (talk) 22:50, 2 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

@~2026-53180-39, you gave the author as "Bureau, US Census", but that is not a person's name, so should not be given in the last name, first name format. Qwerfjkltalk 13:38, 4 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – October 2026

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2026).

Administrator changes

removed

Oversight changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, the good article criteria have been amended to add accessibility requirements.
  • Following an RfC, late signatures added to administrator recall petitions after 720 hours from opening are reverted or struck and do not count towards the threshold, even if the petition has not yet been formally closed.
  • The post-May 2026 administrator elections RfCs concluded with consensus for election monitors to curate blatantly inappropriate questions after posting, and to remove or merge true duplicates, clearly marking merged questions. Calls for candidates will include advisory guidance that users with less than one year’s experience or 5,000 edits generally lack a realistic chance of success.

Technical news

  • Interface administrators no longer need to specify the ResourceLoader option in the definitions for gadgets on MediaWiki:Gadgets-definition as gadgets are always loaded through ResourceLoader. (T298199)
  • The list=abusefilters API module now supports formatversion=2 and includes breaking changes to its responses. In particular, the actions property is now a JSON array rather than a string, regardless of the format version. Maintainers of user scripts and other code using this module should check compatibility and update their code as needed. (T435828)

Arbitration

Obituaries

  • Doug Weller passed away on 30 September 2026. Doug Weller began editing Wikipedia in 2006 and became an administrator in 2008, making nearly 275,000 edits over two decades. He served on the Arbitration Committee from 2015 through 2018 and was also a longtime CheckUser and Oversighter.

Miscellaneous



MassXfD edit summary

[edit]

Minor quibble: Special:Diff/1377769224. Links do appear to be stripped for the XfD templates on the nominated pages, so this should probably use the same. 1234qwer1234qwer4 07:46, 3 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Qwerfjkl (bot) – Charles_Matthews

[edit]

Page: Daniel_Sykes

Diff: Special:Diff/1378173343

Comment/question:

Given that "|editor-first2=" is shown on Template:Cite book in the "Full parameter set in horizontal format" section, this should not be an "Unknown parameter". The report would be a false positive.

Charles Matthews (talk) 08:10, 3 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Charles Matthews, strange, I think this is some kind of bug in the citation template. It emits an error in the article, but it's listed at Module:Citation/CS1/Whitelist#L-283. Not quite sure what's going on here. Qwerfjkltalk 13:44, 4 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
Fixed in this diff. That would be some type of non-printing character, then. Charles Matthews (talk) 13:10, 5 October 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Charles Matthews looks like two left-to-right characters. Perhaps the CS1 module should give errors for these kinds of characters in the parameter name. Qwerfjkltalk 17:52, 5 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Question from Angel45545 on Sylvester Stallone's unrealized projects (02:19, 5 October 2026)

[edit]

I like when make 2 park over top ask u fan I watch ever movie my sick cancer before die like 2 part of this movie --Angel45545 (talk) 02:19, 5 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Qwerfjkl (bot) – Beeflin

[edit]

Page: Chris_Eccleshall

Diff: Special:Diff/1378468493

Comment/question: The link works when I try it. Beeflin (talk) 15:11, 5 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Beeflin, you added  l after the url. Qwerfjkltalk 17:56, 5 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-41

[edit]

18:50, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

Question from TechLearnerBD (19:17, 5 October 2026)

[edit]

Hello! I am new to Wikipedia editing. Could you please guide me on how I can start contributing to articles? --TechLearnerBD (talk) 19:17, 5 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

TechLearnerBD, have you had a look at Help:Getting started? — Qwerfjkltalk 13:05, 7 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

October 2026 Administrator Elections – Discussion Phase

[edit]

The discussion phase of the October 2026 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • October 8–12: Discussion phase (we are here)
  • October 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase
  • Scrutineering phase

We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2026/Discussion phase.

On 13 Oct, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for.

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 8 October 2026 (UTC)Reply

October 2026 Administrator Elections – Discussion Phase

[edit]
Copied from Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous) § October 2026 Administrator Elections – Discussion Phase because this page is listed on Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Subscribe.

The discussion phase of the October 2026 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • October 8–12: Discussion phase (we are here)
  • October 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase
  • Scrutineering phase

We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2026/Discussion phase.

On 13 Oct, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for.

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 8 October 2026 (UTC)Reply