National Alliance (Latvia)
National Alliance Nacionālā apvienība | |
|---|---|
| Abbreviation | NA |
| Chairwoman | Ilze Indriksone |
| Founder | Roberts Zīle |
| Founded | 4 July 2010[1] (electoral alliance) 23 July 2011 (party) |
| Merger of | |
| Headquarters | 2nd floor, 4-1B Torna Street, Riga LV-1050 |
| Newspaper | Nacionālā Neatkarība[2] |
| Youth wing | "Youth for Latvia" (Jaunieši Latvijai) |
| Membership (2026) | |
| Ideology | |
| Political position | Right-wing |
| European affiliation | European Conservatives and Reformists Party[14] |
| European Parliament group | European Conservatives and Reformists Group |
| International affiliation | International Democracy Union |
| Colours |
|
| Saeima | 13 / 100 (13%) |
| European Parliament | 2 / 9 (22%) |
| Government of Latvia | 5 / 14 |
| Riga City Council | 10 / 60 |
| Mayors | 5 / 43 |
| Website | |
| nacionalaapvieniba.lv | |
The National Alliance (Latvian: Nacionālā apvienība, NA), officially the National Alliance "All for Latvia!" – "For Fatherland and Freedom/LNNK" (Latvian: Nacionālā apvienība "Visu Latvijai!" – "Tēvzemei un Brīvībai"/LNNK), is a national-conservative and economically liberal political party in Latvia.
It was formed as an electoral alliance for the 2010 Latvian parliamentary election between the For Fatherland and Freedom/LNNK and All for Latvia! parties. It won eight seats, placing it fourth among all parties. In July 2011, it merged into a single political party under the leadership of Gaidis Bērziņš and Raivis Dzintars. In the 2014 Latvian parliamentary election, it again increased its seats to seventeen, and entered a centre-right coalition, along with Unity and the Union of Greens and Farmers under Prime Minister Laimdota Straujuma.
It has participated in every government of Latvia from the 2011 Latvian parliamentary election until the Siliņa cabinet to prevent Harmony Centre from leading the coalition. It is also a member of the European Conservatives and Reformists Party (ECR) and its two MEPs, Roberts Zīle and Rihards Kols, sit in the ECR group in the European Parliament. The party controls the town and city governments of Ogre, Bauska, Smiltene, Sigulda, and Talsi.
History
[edit]As an electoral alliance (2010–2011)
[edit]
It was founded as an electoral alliance in 2010 by the national-conservative For Fatherland and Freedom/LNNK and the populist radical right All for Latvia! after both were refused entry into the Unity alliance.[15][16] In the 2010 Latvian parliamentary election, the alliance won 8 seats.[17] As part of the outgoing government, it was involved in negotiations after the election to renew the coalition but was vetoed by the Society for Political Change.[18] During these negotiations, the National Alliance had drifted more to the right to become a candidate for Dombrovskis's 'fiscal consolidation' government, only to be vetoed because of its more radical nationalism.[19]
In 2010, the National Alliance initiated a campaign to amend the Constitution of Latvia to make Latvian the sole language of instruction in state-funded schools, collecting the 10,140 signatures needed to launch an official signature drive. Held from 11 May to 9 June 2011, the drive gathered 112,608 signatures, falling short of the 153,232 required to trigger a referendum.[20] In May 2011, the party supported the re-election of Valdis Zatlers in the 2011 Latvian presidential election.[21]
As a political party (2011–present)
[edit]Both parties voted to merge on 23 July 2011.[22]


At the 2011 Latvian parliamentary election, the National Alliance won fourteen seats, an increase of six on the previous year, making it the fourth-largest party in the Saeima. After extensive negotiations with an aim to avoid Kremlin supporting powers from gaining seats in government,[23] it joined a centre-right government with Unity and Zatlers' Reform Party, with the party's Gaidis Bērziņš as Minister for Justice and Žaneta Jaunzeme-Grende as Minister for Culture.[24]
During coalition negotiations, the National Alliance added its own interpretation of four items in the coalition agreement, including support for state-funded higher education, the gradual transition to Latvian as the language of instruction in state-funded education institutions, and the removal of formal barriers to citizenship for non-citizen children while rejecting automatic citizenship.[25] After becoming a junior coalition partner, the National Alliance shifted leftwards. By adopting a mildly oppositional stance towards the fiscally hawkish policies of Prime Minister Valdis Dombrovskis and Finance Minister Andris Vilks, the party blocked some budget proposals by calling for additional spending on families and children.[19]
On 23 August 2013, marking the 25th anniversary of the Baltic Way, the All for Latvia! wing of National Alliance together with Estonian Conservative People's Party and Lithuanian Nationalist and Republican Union signed the Bauska Declaration pledging to promote a "new national awakening" among the Baltic peoples, emphasizing national sovereignty over supranational institutions, opposing immigration and multiculturalism, condemning Russian imperialism, and calling for compensation for damages resulting from the Soviet occupation.[26] The merging of the two founding parties was finalized on the National Alliance's third congress on 7 December 2013, finally creating one unitary party.[27][28]
In 2014, amid the Russo-Ukrainian war, the party's support had grown to 16.6% from 13.9% in 2011.[19] For the 2014 Latvian parliamentary election, the National Alliance campaigned under the slogan "The safest choice for Latvia", emphasising Latvian nationalism, the protection of the Latvian language and culture, and national security, particularly in light of the Russo-Ukrainian war. While remaining part of the governing coalition, the party sought to distinguish itself from its coalition partners, with MEP Roberts Zīle serving as its prime ministerial candidate.[29] The party gained 17 seats and entered a centre-right coalition, along with Unity and the Union of Greens and Farmers under Prime Minister Laimdota Straujuma. In the government, National Alliance received three ministerial posts: the Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development, headed by Kaspars Gerhards; the Ministry of Justice, headed by Dzintars Rasnačs; and the Ministry of Culture, headed by Dace Melbārde.[30]

Ahead of the 2018 Latvian parliamentary election, National Alliance had become increasingly regarded as part of Latvia’s political establishment due to its continuous participation in government since 2011, with its role in government shifting political rhetoric rightwards while diminishing its anti-establishment image.[31] After the election, in which it won 11.02% of the votes and 13 seats,[32] The National Alliance joined a broad centre-right coalition government formed on 23 January 2019 under Prime Minister Krišjānis Kariņš, alongside Development/For!, the New Conservative Party, Kariņš' Unity, and Who Owns the State? party. Within the government, the National Alliance was allocated the ministerial posts of Agriculture (Kaspars Gerhards) and Culture (Dace Melbārde).[33]
In 2019, Raivis Dzintars was re-elected unopposed as party chairman with the support of 239 delegates, while 16 voted against. The congress reaffirmed the party's leadership and highlighted priorities including national defence, opposition to administrative territorial reform, and regaining political influence in Riga.[34]
The National Alliance's campaign for the 2022 Latvian parliamentary election included expanded welfare spending, such as free higher education, student loan cancellation, and subsidised housing, alongside support for state strategic sectors. It also proposed deporting foreign supporters of the Kremlin, introducing mandatory military training for men, setting "reasonable deadlines" for court proceedings, and making Latvian the language of instruction at all levels of education. The party additionally nominated Sigulda mayor Uģis Mitrevics as its prime ministerial candidate instead of the prior Roberts Zīle.[35]
It received 84,939 or 9.29% of the votes, marking a decline from its 11.02% (92,963 votes) result in 2018 and a continued reduction of its voter base, which happened despite the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine and the collapse of its main right-wing rival, The Conservatives, who failed to cross the 5% parliamentary threshold.[36] The National Alliance formed a majority coalition with New Unity and United List with 54 seats in the Saeima[37] and was allocated four ministerial positions: Defence (Ināra Mūrniece), Economy (Ilze Indriksone), Culture (Nauris Puntulis), and Transport (Jānis Vitenbergs).[38]
In February 2024, National Alliance expelled Aleksandrs Kiršteins from its parliamentary faction amid ongoing internal disagreements over political direction after his participation in a China-related delegation led by Ainārs Šlesers, which the party cited as inconsistent with its requirement for coordinated and unified foreign policy.[39] In March polling, the National Alliance's support rose to 10.3%, an increase of 0.3 percentage points from the previous month and briefly placing it in first place ahead of New Unity that the Public Broadcasting of Latvia attributed to the departure of Aleksandrs Kiršteins, whom it described as one of National Alliance's most right-wing and divisive figures, and linked it to improved appeal among moderate conservative voters.[40]
In July 2024, the Corruption Prevention and Combating Bureau ordered the National Alliance to repay 210,673.59€ and suspended its state budget funding for one year after determining that the party had exceeded legal limits on the use of public financing for communication and political advertising in 2022, surpassing the permitted 60% threshold under Latvia's political financing rules.[41][42] The National Alliance appealed the decision.[43]
In December 2025, Raivis Dzintars stepped down as chairman of the National Alliance after leading the party since its founding in 2010, with Ilze Indriksone running for the leadership post, emphasizing greater focus on economic issues without changing the party's political direction.[44]
Ideology and policies
[edit]The National Alliance has been described as national-conservative,[4][5] right-wing populist, nationalist,[45][17][7] and economically liberal.[4][6][7] It has been placed at different points on the political spectrum, including centre-right,[55] right wing,[69] radical right[76] and far right,[83] while some have questioned its placement on the far-right.[84][85][86]
Having been described as an "umbrella party"[87] and a "fairly broad church"[84] its MPs cover a wide range of positions from right-of-centre, from mainstream conservative positions to some considerably further to the right of the political spectrum, while still functioning as one parliamentary party.[88] The party has also been characterised as bringing together Latvia's principal conservative-nationalist forces, ranging from moderate to ultranationalists[6] or soft right to the far right,[29] as well as a coalition of conservatives, ethnonationalists, and economic liberals, which has sought to distance itself from perceptions of extremism associated with the earlier activities of some of its leading members. Its official programme is generally more moderate than the private views attributed to some members.[89] While some of the most prominent members such as Roberts Zīle, Nauris Puntulis and Rihards Kols have been described as closer to conventional conservative parties,[84] others, such as former secretary general Raivis Zeltīts[90] and parliamentary faction consultant Dace Kalniņa, have had documented contacts with British and Ukrainian far-right, although co-chairman Dzintars has publicly distanced the party from these associations, stating that National Alliance representatives are engaged with the Azov movement in their private capacity and that the geopolitical views of the party's secretary-general do not necessarily reflect the party's official politics and ideological positioning.[91] Latvian-American human rights activist and political scientist Nils Muižnieks characterised the National Alliance as "relatively moderate" in 2011 and noted that the party had expelled some of its members for making antisemitic remarks.[92]

In 2013, Daunis Auers and Andres Kasekamp argued that the National Alliance "ticks all the necessary boxes for a modern radical right populist party", citing its adoption of the radical right's rhetorical "master frame" of nativism, authoritarianism and populism, as well as the charismatic leadership of Raivis Dzintars, whose preference vote totals were twice those of the party's second-ranked candidate in the 2010 parliamentary election and three times higher in the 2011 election. They have argued that support for the Kārlis Ulmanis authoritarian regime forms a central part in the National Alliance's ideology, including the prominent role of Kārlis Ulmanis in the party's Independence Day celebrations, which feature a torch procession from his statue to the Freedom Monument. The National Alliance has also aligned with anti-corruption parties, emphasizing law-and-order politics and presenting itself as introducing a "new political culture" in parliament through free votes by its deputies and regular social media communication. It also uses direct-democratic tools, including signature campaigns for referendums on Latvian-language education and a directly elected president. However, Auers and Kasekamp also noted that, unlike many Western European radical-right parties, National Alliance's politics centred on Latvia's ethnic cleavage rather than opposition to European integration or globalization.[70]
In 2023, Auers observed that the party's participation in government had contributed to its mainstreaming and a decline in explicitly anti-elite and anti-corruption rhetoric; as it became an established part of Latvia’s governing elite and abandoned its populist rhetoric.[12] In 2024, Auers argued that the National Alliance had normalized its position within the Latvian political system through its long participation in the Latvian government, distinguishing it from many Western European far-right parties that have remained primarily protest movements. He contended that the party had largely resisted the ideological Europeanization of the far right, remaining rooted in Latvia's historical experience and domestic ethnic cleavages rather than adopting the dominant themes of Western European radical-right politics. Although the merger with All for Latvia! broadened the party's ideological profile by introducing stronger opposition to multiculturalism, immigration, and liberal social values, these issues remained secondary to concerns over Latvian nationhood, the status of the Latvian language, and national security. According to Auers, the party's consistently hawkish stance on Russia and its efforts to "de-Russify" Latvia have shifted the national political mainstream, while its primary ideological focus on countering Russian influence has prevented it from converging fully with broader European far-right, where immigration and Islam typically constitute the central mobilizing issues.[93]
In 2026, political scientist Vassilis Petsinis argued that the National Alliance had undergone a process of "de-radicalization" through sustained participation in government, developing into a party of the national conservative right rather than the radical right. He contrasted the party's trajectory with more radical right-wing movements in the region, arguing that the National Alliance became integrated into Latvia's political mainstream by pursuing its goals through parliamentary and governmental institutions. Although it retained its emphasis on Latvian national identity, language policy, and opposition to Russian influence, the party moderated its anti-systemic tendencies and increasingly aligned with broader centre-right positions.[13]
Economic and welfare policy
[edit]Economically, the party combines support for free-market policies and tax reductions with elements of economic nationalism and welfare chauvinism. Its programme emphasizes strengthening the national economy, reducing emigration, encouraging the return of Latvian expatriates, and supporting domestic economic development. The party has also criticized aspects of European Union economic policy and advocates targeted welfare measures linked to its broader demographic objectives.[94]
Family and demographic policy
[edit]Family and demographic policy has been one of the National Alliance's principal priorities since entering government in 2011, reflecting its stated objective of promoting population growth and preserving the Latvian nation. Beginning with the 2012 state budget negotiations, the party repeatedly issued what have been termed as "demography ultimatums", making its support for coalition budgets contingent on the adoption of measures to support families with children. Among its proposals were increases in childcare and family benefits, support for preschool expenses, expanded parental leave, additional benefits for large families through its "Third Child" initiative, and stronger legal protections for parents during pregnancy and consecutive births. Several family-policy reforms adopted from 2013 onwards, including more generous childcare benefits, extended parental leave provisions, and increased support for families with three or more children, have been attributed by scholars to the National Alliance's influence within governing coalitions. According to some analyses, these reforms reflected the party's demographic priorities despite limited ideological support from some coalition partners, who generally favoured more targeted forms of family assistance and expressed concerns about the effects of such policies on labour-market participation.[95]
In 2016, National Alliance advocated for the establishment of a dedicated Minister for Demography and has sought to make demographic policy a priority of government, arguing for stronger support for measures to address Latvia's demographic challenges.[96]
In 2021, the party submitted to the Saeima a draft law regarding an amendment to the Constitution, which intended to strictly define the concept of family as a union of a male and a female person.[97]
Migration policy
[edit]During the 2015 European migrant crisis, the party consistently opposed mandatory EU refugee relocation quotas, arguing that Latvia should retain full control over immigration and asylum policy.[98] National Alliance ministers also voted against the Straujuma cabinet's decision to voluntarily accept an additional 526 refugees under the EU relocation scheme.[99]
Party co-chairman Gaidis Bērziņš argued that Latvia's history and demographic situation justified exemptions or special treatment regarding refugee admissions under EU burden-sharing mechanisms.[100] In August 2015, party members took part in organizing an anti-immigration protest in front of the Palace of Justice in Riga.[101] This anti-immigration position was accented in the annual foreign affair debates in the Saeima, also turning against perceived liberal immigration policy and political correctness in the EU.[102]
In 2017, National Alliance opposed proposals to relax guest worker hiring rules in Latvia, warning that increased low-wage labor migration could depress wages for domestic workers and intensify labour market pressures despite reported sectoral labour shortages.[103] It has compared the modern advocates of immigration with those who supported the planned mass immigration to the Latvian Soviet Socialist Republic, which affected the demographics of Latvia.[104]
In 2025, the party co-initiated and supported the creation of a parliamentary investigative commission tasked with reviewing Latvia’s immigration and asylum systems to identify regulatory and enforcement gaps and propose stricter migration control and security measures;[105] its chairman and National Alliance MP Jānis Dombrava stated that "politicians, entrepreneurs, and organized crime see the money that can be made from immigrants" and that "the internal affairs services are pushed aside, their warnings are ignored."[106]
Environmental policy
[edit]The party has a relatively consistent but internally mixed view of the environment in its official platforms. Nature and the environment are repeatedly presented both as an element of national identity and as an economic asset. On the one hand, party documents describe the natural environment as a "national treasure" and link it to the spiritual and cultural strength of the nation, especially in relation to forests and rural landscapes. On the other hand, environmental resources are explicitly framed as instruments for economic growth, employment, and national competitiveness.[74]
A central recurring theme is the idea of a "green country" and "green economy". The party promotes forestry, agriculture, and tourism as sectors where Latvia's natural endowments can be leveraged, including organic production and eco-tourism. At the same time, it stresses that forest and environmental policy should balance economic use with biodiversity conservation and long-term sustainability, with some later documents incorporating language aligned with sustainable development frameworks and circular economy ideas.[74]
In terms of governance, the dominant position of National Alliance is statist. The state is consistently assigned primary responsibility for environmental policy, including regulation of land use, environmental protection, forest management, and setting development priorities for the green economy. Market-based instruments appear, but mainly as supporting mechanisms rather than autonomous drivers of sustainability policy.[74]
Participatory governance and broader network-based approaches are present but limited. Some references are made to expert involvement and public participation in planning, but these remain secondary to state coordination. Overall, the party's approach combines a strong state-centered governance model with selective adoption of sustainable development discourse, shaped by concerns over resource sovereignty and national control over key assets such as forests.[74]
Remembrance Day of the Latvian Legionnaires
[edit]The party supports the establishment of a national day of remembrance for the Latvian Legion, a mostly conscription-based military formation within Nazi Germany's Waffen-SS, arguing that they were not Nazis but rather martyred liberation fighters resisting both the Soviet and Nazi occupations, who were later acquitted at the Nuremberg trials. The Saeima has rejected proposals by the National Alliance to formally establish it as a holiday in 2013, 2018, and 2019.[107][108][109] MPs from the National Alliance are regular participants in the annual commemoration events for the Latvian Legion.[110]
Foreign policy
[edit]Latvia is and will be an active and loyal member of the European Union (EU) and NATO. Therefore, the National Union is vigorously involved both in increasing defense spending and in supporting the continuous presence of allied NATO troops in Latvia.
The NA advocates a European Union of national states whose sovereignty and cultural qualities are respected and valued. The National Alliance opposes the federalization of the EU, which would result in small countries such as Latvia losing the opportunity to equally influence the processes of development and advancement of the EU.
National Alliance's foreign policy is strongly shaped by Latvia’s relations with Russia and its orientation toward Euro-Atlantic security structures. The party supports Latvia’s membership in the European Union and NATO, frames Latvia as part of the Western geopolitical space, advocating reducing Russian political and cultural influence. It has consistently taken a critical stance towards Russia, including opposition to Russian actions in Ukraine. In European Parliament politics, it is affiliated with the European Conservatives and Reformists Group rather than the Identity and Democracy group, reflecting its broader pro-Western alignment compared to more Russia-friendly right-wing parties in Europe.
European Union
[edit]National Alliance has been described as exhibiting geopolitical, economic and sociocultural forms of Euroscepticism. While supporting Latvia's membership of the European Union for geopolitical and security reasons, it opposes European federalism and advocates greater national sovereignty, particularly in matters of immigration and national identity. The party has criticized multiculturalism and other aspects of European integration associated with Euro-federalism. Following its entry into government in 2011, it has moderated its Eurosceptic rhetoric, presenting itself as seeking a return to the European Union's "original" values rather than opposing membership itself.[112]
Russia
[edit]The National Alliance's position on Russia is structured around three main themes: general outlook, historical memory, and defence. In its general foreign policy orientation, the party does not regard Russia as a cooperative partner and instead frames it as a geopolitical and civilisational "other". It has advocated Latvia's distancing from Russia's sphere of influence, or the so-called "Russian world", and consistently emphasised Latvia’s belonging to the "Western geopolitical space", alongside pledges to "liberate" Latvia from Russia’s geopolitical influence. Unlike other Western European nationalist parties, the National Alliance has not advanced territorial claims or sought to reopen the Latvian–Russian border settlement, instead focusing on countering Russian political, economic, and cultural influence.[113]
A second theme concerns historical memory and the interpretation of Soviet rule. The party has repeatedly framed Russia as responsible for the Soviet occupation of Latvia, advocating international recognition of "the totalitarian Communist crimes as identical to the National Socialist crimes". It has supported legal measures against the denial of Latvia’s occupation and called for restrictions on the public use of Soviet and Russian imperial symbols. This emphasis reflects a broader memory-political agenda in which Soviet-era history is treated as central to Latvia's contemporary political identity.[113]
The third theme relates to security and defence, particularly Russia's political influence in Latvia. The National Alliance has consistently emphasised in its manifestos its self-proclaimed role as the guarantor that no "pro-Russian" party would be included in coalition government in Latvia, stating that it is "the only force represented in Saeima which strongly defends the interests of citizens of Latvia and Latvians and precludes the inclusion of the Kremlin’s partners in the government". This position has been closely associated with its criticism of Harmony Centre, particularly its cooperation agreement with United Russia and its ambiguous stance regarding the Soviet occupation of Latvia in 1940. In addition, the party has advocated reducing Latvia's dependence on Russia in sectors such as energy, finance, and real estate, increasing defence spending to NATO targets, and strengthening military preparedness.[113]
Following Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the National Alliance's long-standing warnings about Russia gained broader political acceptance in Latvia. Policies the party had advocated for years, such as reducing the role of the Russian language in public life, ending state-funded Russian-language education, and removing Soviet monuments, became increasingly mainstream. The party's opposition to Vladimir Putin's regime and its support for Ukraine strengthened a public perception that it had been "right" about Russia.[12]
Voter base
[edit]The National Alliance's voter base consists predominantly of Latvian-speaking voters, with only 4% of its voters speaking Russian at home. In the 2022 Latvian parliamentary election, the party had a gender-balanced and age-balanced electorate, with voters with higher education slightly overrepresented. It attracted support from citizens across different income groups and was comparatively successful in reaching rural voters. For 50% of National Alliance voters, the party's advocacy on specific issues relevant to their interests was among the most important criteria in their electoral choice. The party also had a relatively stable electorate, with 42% of its voters making their final voting decision during the last week of the campaign, among the lowest shares compared with other major parties.[114]
Ideologically, National Alliance voters occupy an intermediate position between the more change-oriented electorates of New Unity and The Progressives and the more conservative-authoritarian electorates of Latvia First and Sovereign Power. They share a broadly similar conservative-authoritarian orientation with voters of the United List and the Union of Greens and Farmers, although the National Alliance voters exhibit somewhat weaker authoritarian attitudes than supporters of those two parties.[115]
Election results
[edit]Legislative elections
[edit]| Election | Party leader | Performance | Rank | Government | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Votes | % | ± pp | Seats | +/– | ||||
| 2010 | Roberts Zīle | 74,029 | 7.84 | New | 8 / 100 |
New | 4th | Opposition |
| 2011 | Raivis Dzintars | 127,208 | 14.01 | 14 / 100 |
Coalition | |||
| 2014 | 151,567 | 16.72 | 17 / 100 |
Coalition | ||||
| 2018 | Roberts Zīle | 92,963 | 11.08 | 13 / 100 |
Coalition | |||
| 2022 | Raivis Dzintars | 84,939 | 9.40 | 13 / 100 |
Coalition (2022–2023) | |||
| Opposition (2023–2026) | ||||||||
| Coalition (2026–) | ||||||||
| 2026 | Ilze Indriksone | 71,579 | 9.02 | 10 / 100 |
||||
European Parliament elections
[edit]| Election | List leader | Votes | % | Seats | +/– | EP Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Roberts Zīle | 63,229 | 17.56 (#3) | 1 / 8 |
New | ECR |
| 2019 | 77,591 | 16.49 (#3) | 2 / 8 |
|||
| 2024 | 114,858 | 22.32 (#2) | 2 / 9 |
|||
Riga City Council
[edit]| Election | Votes | % | Seats | +/– |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 40,920 | 17.86 (#2) | 12 / 60 |
|
| 2017 | 23,135 | 9.25 (#4) | 6 / 60 |
|
| 2020 | 16,435 | 9.64 (#4) | 7 / 60 |
|
| 2025 | 30,328 | 14.20 (#3) | 10 / 60 |
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ↑ "VL/TB/LNNK dibināšanas kongresā sola stiprināt latviešu valodu". Delfi. 4 July 2010. Archived from the original on 9 July 2010.
- ↑ "Nacionālā Neatkarība". nacionalaapvieniba.lv. Retrieved 9 June 2026.
- ↑ "The People and the Party are United! Which Parties in Latvia are the Most Numerous?". Baltijas Balss. 4 May 2026. Retrieved 9 June 2026.
- 1 2 3 4 5 Bernd Henningsen; Krister Hanne; Tobias Etzold, eds. (2017). The Baltic Sea Region: a Comprehensive Guide. Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag. p. 341. ISBN 978-3-830-51727-6.
National Alliance (Nacionālā apvienība, NA): National conservatism, economic liberalism; right-wing
- 1 2 Aleksandra Semendjajeva (13 June 2024). "Latvia does it again: the right-wing prevails". Foundation for European Progressive Studies. Retrieved 9 June 2026.
National-conservative/right-wing populist National Alliance 'All for Latvia! – For Fatherland and Freedom/LNNK'
- 1 2 3 Hyndle-Hussein, Joanna (10 October 2018). "Parliamentary elections in Latvia: the fragmentation of the political scene". Centre for Eastern Studies. Retrieved 8 November 2018.
Brings together the main conservative-nationalist forces, from moderate to ultranationalist. Pro-European, but preserving national interests. Economically liberal.
- 1 2 3 Daniel Nilsson DeHanas; Marat Shterin, eds. (2020). Religion and the Rise of Populism. Taylor & Francis. p. 112. ISBN 978-1-000-50757-7.
Nationalism, nativism, conservatism, economic liberalism
- ↑ Ikstens, Jānis (2020). "Short-lived coalitions in Latvia: Ethnic tension, political fragmentation, and office-seeking". In Matt Evans (ed.). Coalition Government as a Reflection of a Nation’s Politics and Society: A Comparative Study of Parliamentary Parties and Cabinets in 12 Countries. Taylor & Francis. p. 112. ISBN 978-0-429-74877-6.
Although the Latvian nationalists initially endorsed a notably liberal economic programme, they gradually moved to more moderate positions and embraced a limited economic role for the state and publicly funded measures in order to address demographic challenges and support small and medium-sized enterprises. However, they remained loyal to a socially conservative agenda
- ↑ Bukovskis, Kārlis, ed. (2016). Euroscepticism in Small EU Member States. Latvian Institute of International Affairs. p. 90. ISBN 978-9984-583-81-5.
- ↑ De Vries, Catherine E. (2018). Euroscepticism and the Future of European Integration. Oxford University Press. p. 106. ISBN 978-0192-511-90-4.
- ↑ Petsinis, Vassilis (2022). Cross-Regional Ethnopolitics in Central and Eastern Europe: Lessons from the Western Balkans and the Baltic States. Springer International Publishing. p. 150. ISBN 978-3030-999-51-3.
The focus on the NA is due to this party's consistent propagation of ethno-nationalist, on 'demographic issues' and the necessity to safe-guard the institutional status of the Latvian language, and soft Eurosceptic prerogatives from within the halls of power.
- 1 2 3 Auers, Daunis (2023). "The Russia-Ukraine War and Right-Wing Populism in Latvia". In Ivaldi, Gilles; Zankina, Emilia (eds.). The Impacts of the Russian Invasion of Ukraine on Right-wing Populism in Europe. Vol. 20. European Center for Populism Studies. pp. 431–449. doi:10.55271/rp0023. ISBN 978-9-46475-548-0.
- 1 2 Petsinis, Vassilis (2 February 2026). "Echoes of the War in Ukraine: Ramifications on the Estonian and Latvian Right". Nationalities Papers. Cambridge University Press: 1–18. doi:10.1017/nps.2025.10118.
- ↑ "National Alliance "All For Latvia!" - "For Fatherland and Freedom/LNNK"". European Conservatives and Reformists Party. Retrieved 9 June 2026.
- ↑ Kaža, Juris (14 August 2018). "Who is who in upcoming Latvian parliamentary elections". Re:Baltica. Retrieved 17 August 2018.
- ↑ Greenhalgh, Nathan (31 May 2010). "Unity forgoes merging with far-right". Baltic Reports. Retrieved 8 November 2018.
- 1 2 Bogushevitch, Tatyana; Dimitrovs, Aleksejs (November 2010). "Elections in Latvia: status quo for minorities remains" (PDF). Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe. 9 (1): 72–89. Retrieved 19 September 2011.
- ↑ Strautmanis, Andris (25 October 2010). "Veto ousts nationalists from new government; 2 parties remain in talks". Latvians Online. Retrieved 18 July 2011.
- 1 2 3 Eihmanis, Edgars (2019). "Latvia – An Ever-Wider Gap: The Ethnic Divide in Latvian Party Politics". In Swen Hutter; Hanspeter Kriesi (eds.). European Party Politics in Times of Crisis. Cambridge University Press. pp. 236–258. ISBN 978-1-108-65278-0.
- ↑ Strautmanis, Andris (10 June 2011). "No referendum on school language as signature drive falls short — officials". Latvians Online. Retrieved 18 July 2011.
- ↑ "Supporters line up behind Zatlers". The Baltic Times. 18 May 2011. Retrieved 23 May 2011.
- ↑ "Latvian political parties undergo major upheaval". The Baltic Times. 12 July 2011. Retrieved 18 July 2011.
- ↑ "Reboot in Riga". The Economist. 24 September 2011. Retrieved 15 September 2011.
- ↑ Strautmanis, Andris (25 October 2011). "Saeima confirms new government". Latvians Online. Retrieved 18 July 2011.
- ↑ "National association interprets four items in parties' agreement document". Baltic News Network. LETA. 11 October 2011. Retrieved 6 June 2026.
- ↑ Minkenberg, Michael (2015). Transforming the Transformation? The East European Radical Right in the Political Process. Taylor & Francis. p. 151. ISBN 978-1-31754-939-0.
- ↑ "Nacionālā apvienība apvienosies vienā partijā un cer kļūt par valdošo partiju nākamajā Saeimā | Jaunākās Ziņas Latvijā". Focus.lv. Archived from the original on 31 March 2014. Retrieved 19 June 2014.
- ↑ "Ir – Nacionālā apvienība apvienosies vienā partijā". Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 19 June 2014.
- 1 2 "Guide to 2014 Saeima elections: The Parties (Part 2)". Public Broadcasting of Latvia. 23 September 2014. Retrieved 7 May 2019.
- ↑ "Latvian Saeima approves of the new Straujuma government". The Baltic Course. 5 November 2014. Retrieved 12 November 2014.
- ↑ Bergmane, Una (26 September 2018). "Why Latvian Elections Matter for Europe". Foreign Policy Research Institute. Retrieved 9 June 2026.
- ↑ "Latvian election results show shape of new Saeima". Public Broadcasting of Latvia. 6 October 2018. Retrieved 9 June 2026.
- ↑ "Latvia gets a new government led by Krišjānis Kariņš". Public Broadcasting of Latvia. 23 January 2019. Retrieved 7 May 2019.
- ↑ "National Alliance reelects current leader Raivis Dzintars". Public Broadcasting of Latvia. 19 December 2019. Retrieved 13 November 2021.
- ↑ "Saeima Elections 2022: All The Parties (Part 3)". Public Broadcasting of Latvia. 7 September 2022. Retrieved 9 June 2025.
- ↑ Bergmane, Una (11 October 2018). "New Unity's New Partners: Coalition Building After Latvia's 2022 Elections". Foreign Policy Research Institute. Retrieved 9 June 2026.
- ↑ "New Latvian coalition to consist of three parties". Public Broadcasting of Latvia. 24 October 2022. Retrieved 9 June 2025.
- ↑ "Latvia's coalition parties sign next government agreement". Public Broadcasting of Latvia. 14 December 2022. Retrieved 9 June 2025.
- ↑ "National Alliance expels member after Saeima delegation's dubious visit to China". Baltic News Network. LETA. 6 February 2024. Retrieved 6 June 2026.
- ↑ "National Alliance tops February political popularity poll". Public Broadcasting of Latvia. 8 March 2024. Retrieved 6 June 2026.
If the elections were held in March, 10.3% of voters would vote for the National Alliance – 0.3% more than a month earlier. The rise is enough to take it past New Unity at the top of the table. Possibly the right-of-center political grouping has actually been helped by the departure from its ranks of one of its most right-wing and divisive figures, allowing more moderate conservatives to feel more comfortable about lending support to NA.
- ↑ "National Alliance political party told to pay back 210,000 euros". Public Broadcasting of Latvia. 4 July 2022. Retrieved 9 June 2025.
- ↑ "National Alliance ordered to pay back 210 673 to state budget; KNAB halts financing for one year". Baltic News Network. LETA. 4 July 2024. Retrieved 9 June 2025.
- ↑ "National Alliance appeals decision on party's unlawful spending". Public Broadcasting of Latvia. LETA. 8 July 2022. Retrieved 9 June 2025.
- ↑ "Raivis Dzintars steps down. Ilze Indriksone runs for leadership post in National Alliance". Baltic News Network. LETA. 5 December 2026. Retrieved 6 June 2026.
- ↑ Cianetti, Licia (2019). The Quality of Divided Democracies: Minority Inclusion, Exclusion, and Representation in the New Europe. University of Michigan Press. p. 109. ISBN 978-0-47213-116-7.
- ↑ Jānis Ikstens (3 March 2026). "Political parties in Latvia". Latvian National Encyclopedia (in Latvian). Retrieved 9 June 2026.
- ↑ Juris Kaža (14 August 2018). "Who Is Who In Upcoming Latvian Parliamentary Elections". Re:Baltica. Retrieved 9 June 2026.
National Alliance (Nacionāla apvienība/NA) was formed in 2010 as an electoral alliance between the youth-oriented All For Latvia! (Visu Latvijai!) and For Fatherland and Freedom/LNNK (Tēvzemei un Brīvībai/LNNK-Latvijas Nacionāla neatkarības kustība) and is a right-of-center nationalist party.
- ↑ Bergmane, Una (28 June 2017). "National Alliance tops April's party ratings". Foreign Policy Research Institute. Retrieved 6 June 2026.
In the months before the elections, the national question was constantly and explicitly articulated by the center-right National Alliance.
- ↑ Chmielewski, Bartosz (4 June 2025). ""Make Riga Great Again? The Latvian Municipal Election Race"". The Geopolitics and Security Studies Center. Retrieved 6 June 2026.
On one side, there is the "Latvian parties" alliance made up of the center-right (New Unity, National Alliance), liberals, and the left (Progressives).
- ↑ Hiršs, Mārtiņš (1 June 2026). "Study shows Latvians are 'liberal', 'conservative' and often both at once". Public Broadcasting of Latvia. Retrieved 6 June 2026.
National Alliance (NA, regarded as nationalist and right-of-centre)
- ↑ "Latvia reelects incumbent Karins". Deutsche Welle. 10 February 2022. Retrieved 9 June 2026.
The 57-year-old became the head of the Latvian government in January 2019 by forming a coalition with four parties: the center-right National Alliance, the centrist Development/For!, the Conservatives and Karins' own New Unity Party.
- ↑ Homel, Lisa (10 February 2022). "Russia's war pushes Latvia's voters to the center". Atlantic Council. Retrieved 9 June 2026.
A victorious New Unity will likely seek to form a government with more or less the same coalition partners as the current government: the center-right, nationalistic, anti-Kremlin National Alliance (NA); the liberal-democrat, pro-European Union Development/For! (AP!); and the moderate-right, anti-corruption-focused Conservatives (K).
- ↑ Homel, Lisa (10 February 2022). "Latvian premier's center-right party wins national election". APNews. Retrieved 9 June 2026.
The center-right National Alliance and the centrist Development/For!, which are both members in Karins' current minority coalition government, are among them.
- ↑ Tanner, Jari (10 January 2022). "Latvia's centrists are predicted to win national vote". Washington Times. Retrieved 9 June 2026.
Karins, who became head of Latvia's government in January 2019, currently leads a four-party minority coalition that along with New Unity includes the center-right National Alliance, the centrist Development/For!, and the Conservatives.
- ↑ [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54]
- ↑ Panagiotis E., Petrakis; Kostis, Pantelis C.; Valsamis, Dionysis G. (2014). European Economics and Politics in the Midst of the Crisis: From the Outbreak of the Crisis to the Fragmented European Federation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. p. 69. ISBN 978-3-64241-344-5.
- ↑ Nakai, Ryo (December 2018). "Rise of Outsiders in Estonia and Latvia Municipal Elections in 2017: Radical Rightist and Reformist Populist" (PDF). Journal of Law and Political Science. XLVI (1/2). Kyushu University: 98. ISSN 1347-2631.
These parties are the centre-left Russian minority party Harmony (S) ⑷ , the centre-right and economically liberal party Unity (V), the Latvian nationalist right-wing National Alliance (NA), and the rural-based and oligarchical the Union of Greens and Farmers (ZZS).
- ↑ Ijabs, Ivars (October 2018). "2018 Parliamentary Elections in Latvia" (PDF). Friedrich Ebert Foundation. Retrieved 2 October 2022.
National Alliance »Visu Latvijai! – TB/LNNK« is a right-wing Latvian nationalist party, whose main function is to oppose all things seemingly Soviet and/or Russian.
- ↑ "Latvia: decisive election gains for pro-western parties". Civicus. 6 October 2022. Retrieved 9 June 2026.
Likely to play a continuing role in government is the right-wing nationalist National Alliance party.
- ↑ "Latvia: Freedom in the World 2023 Country Report". Freedom House. March 2023. Retrieved 9 June 2026.
After competitive and credible parliamentary elections in October, the center-right party New Unity won 26 out of 100 seats in the Saeima (parliament) and established a ruling coalition with the centrist alliance United List and the right-wing National Alliance.
- ↑ "Pro-Russia party wins most votes in Latvia election". BBC News. 18 September 2011. Retrieved 15 September 2011.
The other two parties who crossed the 5% threshold needed to enter parliament are the Greens and Farmers Union with 12% and the right-wing National Alliance with 14%.
- ↑ Carlson, Kathryn (25 May 2025). "Latvian centrist moves to form coalition government". Politico. Retrieved 9 June 2025.
According to the centrist politician, his party has reached a "division plan" with the right-wing National Alliance, the green-conservative Green and Farmers' Union, and the center-right New Unity parties.
- ↑ "PM's party wins Latvian parliamentary elections: exit poll". Xinhua News Agency. 2 November 2022. Retrieved 6 June 2026.
Five more political parties appeared to have received more than 5 percent of votes, a threshold to get seats in parliament: the right-wing National Alliance with 8.4 percent,
- ↑ "Pro-Russian Harmony tipped to be Latvia's largest party following election". The Guardian. Agence France-Presse. 7 October 2018. Retrieved 6 June 2026.
A public TV exit poll showed Harmony had a 19.4% vote share, while the liberal pro-EU, pro-Nato For Development was in second place with 13.4%, ahead of the rightwing National Alliance on 12.6%.
- ↑ "Pro-Russia party wins most votes in Latvian". SBS. 7 October 2018. Retrieved 6 June 2026.
The party's coalition partners, the right-wing National Alliance and the centre-right Unity party also lost seats.
- ↑ "ZRP, Unity, National Alliance announce plans for coalition rule". Latvians Online. 14 October 2011. Retrieved 6 June 2026.
The new government is expected to be a three-party coalition including the Zatlers Reform Party (Zatlera Reformu partija, or ZRP), the centrist Unity (Vienotība) and the right-wing National Alliance (Nacionālā apvienība "Visu Latvijai!" – "Tēvzemei un Brīvībai/LNNK").
- ↑ Kramer, Samuel (28 September 2022). "Latvian Elections: Visions of a Fractured Saeima - Foreign Policy Research Institute". Foreign Policy Research Institute. Retrieved 9 June 2026.
This alliance — the United List (Apvienotais saraksts) — polled at 9.2% in September 2022, third place behind the ruling centre-right New Unity Party (Jaunā Vienotība) and right-wing coalition member National Alliance (Nacionālā apvienība).
- ↑ Zduńczyk, Tomasz (21 May 2026). "Attempts to form a new government in Latvia". Polish Institute of International Affairs. Retrieved 9 June 2026.
Furthermore, due to the ideologically motivated resistance by the right-wing National Alliance (NA) to cooperation with PRO, the party of the former defence minister, it is not possible to form a government including both these groups. Meanwhile, Kulbergs began coalition talks with the ZSS and NA
- ↑ [56][57][4][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68]
- 1 2 Auers, Daunis; Kasekamp, Andres (2013). "Comparing Radical-Right Populism in Estonia and Latvia". Right-Wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse. London/New York: Bloomsbury. pp. 235–248. ISBN 978-1-78093-343-6.
- ↑ Braghiroli, Stefano; Petsinis, Vassilis (2019). "Between party-systems and identity-politics: the populist and radical right in Estonia and Latvia". European Politics and Society. 20 (4): 431–449. doi:10.1080/23745118.2019.1569340. hdl:10062/64608. ISSN 2374-5118. S2CID 159411323.
- ↑ Mudde, Cas (2016). On Extremism and Democracy in Europe. Taylor & Francis. p. 21. ISBN 978-1-31722-222-4.
The fact that the populist radical right National Alliance (NA) has practically doubled its electoral support between 2006 and 2011 should therefore surprise no one.
- ↑ Minkenberg, Michael (2015). Transforming the Transformation? The East European Radical Right in the Political Process. Taylor & Francis. p. 128. ISBN 978-1-31754-939-0.
The Latvian case of a government coalition involving a radical right party can be considered the least spectacular in that the National Alliance joining a three-party coalition following the September 2011 election occurred in a rather routine way.
- 1 2 3 4 5 Timofejevs, Pēteris F (2020). "The Environment and Populist Radical Right in Eastern Europe: The Case of National Alliance 2010–2018". Sustainability. 12 (19). doi:10.3390/su12198092.
- ↑ Bergmane, Una (11 October 2022). "New Unity's New Partners: Coalition Building After Latvia's 2022 Elections". Foreign Policy Research Institute. Retrieved 9 June 2026.
The National Alliance is the radical right party that has been a member of governing coalitions since 2011.
- ↑ [70][71][72][73][74][75]
- ↑ Halikiopoulou, Daphne (2023). "The Far Right". In Neil Carter; Daniel Keith; Gyda M. Sindre; Sofia Vasilopoulou (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Political Parties. Taylor & Francis. p. 126. doi:10.4324/9780429263859. ISBN 9780429554414.
This has marked a reversal of the cordon sanitaire (see later), suggesting that far right parties are now being treated as legitimate actors both by their voters and by their political competitors. Examples are the Italian Lega, the Danish People's Party (DF), the Latvian National Alliance (NA), the Estonian Conservative People's Party of Estonia (EKRE), the Austrian FPÖ, the Finns Party (PS), the Polish Law and Justice (PiS), the Hungarian Fidesz and the Greek Popular Orthodox Rally (LAOS).
- ↑ Timofey Agarin, ed. (2022). "Estonia and Latvia: Europeanising and democratising in ethnically divided societies". The (Not So) Surprising Longevity of Identity Politics: Contemporary Challenges of the State-Society Compact in Central Eastern Europe. Taylor & Francis. p. 156. ISBN 978-1-00057-576-7.
The far-right nationalist National Alliance did not emerge as a new party with a new exclusivist agenda.
- ↑ Chu, Leo (28 September 2022). "Latvian Parliamentary Elections: Party Platform Guide". Foreign Policy Research Institute. Retrieved 9 June 2026.
NA is a far-right populist party alliance that is distinctly ethnonationalist and advocates for a "Latvian Latvia."
- ↑ Fairclough, Gordon (18 February 2012). "Language Vote Refuels Latvia Tension". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved 31 August 2022.
- ↑ Martyn-Hemphill, Richard (7 December 2015). "Latvia Government Falls as Prime Minister Quits". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 13 November 2021.
But she later sent text messages to fellow members of her center-right Unity party — the largest in a broad coalition that includes the Greens and Farmers party as well as the far-right National Alliance — saying that she was indeed bowing to pressure and stepping down.
- ↑ Rettman, Andrew (26 May 2019). "Turnout up in Slovakia, with pro-EU liberals scoring high". EUobserver. Retrieved 31 August 2022.
- ↑ [77][78][79][80][81][82]
- 1 2 3 "Latvian election tips for foreign correspondents". Public Broadcasting of Latvia. 30 September 2022. Retrieved 9 June 2026.
The Nationalists are not necessarily 'far right'. The main nationalist political grouping, the National Alliance, is sometimes referred to as a 'far right' party in international news reports. This is perhaps a little unfair. Though it does have some members who might merit that description, it is a fairly broad church. While it is certainly right-of-center and unashamedly nationalist in character, some of its more prominent members such as Vice-President of the European Parliament Roberts Zīle, Culture Minister Nauris Puntulis or Chairman of the Saeima Foreign Affairs Committee Rihards Kols have more in common with conventional conservative parties than with far-right ones, and many of the National Alliance's economic policies owe more to Keynes than Friedman.
- ↑ Mudde, Cas (2 June 2014). "EU earthquake? Not quite". hate-speech.org. Retrieved 9 June 2026.
Of these, some have far-right factions, but are not overall far-right parties – this is the case with the Finns Party (PS) and the Latvian National Alliance (NA).
- ↑ "Politics In The Shadow of the Russian Threat: Understanding Elections in the Baltic Nations". Electoral Bulletin of the European Union. Elections in Europe (5). Paris: Groupe d'études géopolitiques. 2024. Retrieved 9 June 2026.
Given its history, I wouldn't consider the National Alliance to be a far-right party.
- ↑ Mawhood, Will (16 February 2023). "Progresīvie and Gen Z: A leftward shift for Latvia?". Meduza. Retrieved 9 June 2026.
Kols' National Alliance is an umbrella party
- ↑ "13th Saeima elections: The parties (Part 1)". Public Broadcasting of Latvia. 13 August 2018. Retrieved 28 November 2019.
One of three parties forming the current ruling coalition, the National Alliance, as the name suggests, is in fact made up of several smaller parties but acts as a single party. This does however explain why its MPs cover a large swathe of right-of-center territory from mainstream conservative to some considerably further to the right of the political spectrum.
- ↑ E. L. (18 September 2011). "Snap election falls flat". The Economist. Retrieved 15 September 2011.
The other possible partner is a coalition of conservatives, ethnonationalists and economic liberals called the National Alliance. It has worked hard to shed the suspicion of extremism created by the previous (youthful) behaviour of some of its leading lights. Its programme is tamer than some of its members' private opinions (it wants a moderate increase in the amount of Latvian teaching in schools). Plenty of wiggle room there too.
- ↑ "Senior National Alliance figure apologises for "cloud" of far-right messages". Public Broadcasting of Latvia. 12 November 2019. Retrieved 28 November 2019.
- ↑ Ragozin, Leonid; Jemberga, Sanita (13 December 2019). "Azov Movement's Race War Plans Find Sympathetic Audience in Latvian Government Party". Re:Baltica. Retrieved 13 November 2021.
- ↑ McLaughlin, Daniel (29 April 2011). "Annual row over march of SS veterans does little for Latvia's image abroad". Irish Times. Retrieved 13 November 2021.
Even the National Alliance – which includes the nationalist All for Latvia party and holds eight of parliament's 100 seats – is relatively moderate and has expelled members for making anti-Semitic remarks, Muiznieks said. "By European standards extremism is very weak in Latvia," he added.
- ↑ Auers, Daunis (20 June 2023). "The (non) Europeanization of Latvia's Far Right". Nationalities Papers. 52 (6). Cambridge University Press: 1273–1291. doi:10.1017/nps.2023.39.
- ↑ Halikiopoulou, Daphne; Vlandas, Tim (2022). "The Baltic Countries: Latvia and Estonia". Understanding right-wing populism and what to do about it (PDF). Friedrich Ebert Foundation. p. 14. ISBN 978-3-98628-156-4.
- ↑ Plavgo, Ilze; Karremans, Johannes; Rajevska, Olga (2026). "Latvia: Welfare Reform in the Context of EU Accession and Emigration of the Working-Age Population". In Hemerijck, Anton; Bokhorst, David (eds.). Governing the Welfare Commons: On Europe's Social Investment Turn. Oxford University Press. pp. 258–283. doi:10.1093/9780198971481.003.0010. ISBN 978-0-19897-148-1.
- ↑ "National Alliance still floats extra minister portfolio". Public Broadcasting of Latvia. 7 January 2019. Retrieved 10 November 2023.
- ↑ "National Alliance wants Constitution of Latvia to strictly define 'family'". Public Broadcasting of Latvia. 7 January 2021. Retrieved 10 November 2023.
- ↑ "Majority of Latvian politicians are against refugee quotas". Baltic News Network. LETA. 29 May 2015. Retrieved 8 November 2018.
- ↑ "Latvian government adopts position on refugees". Public Broadcasting of Latvia. 17 September 2015. Retrieved 8 November 2018.
- ↑ "Nationalists ask special status for Latvia over refugee matters". Public Broadcasting of Latvia. 11 September 2015. Retrieved 8 November 2018.
- ↑ "Nationalists plan anti-refugee protest". Public Broadcasting of Latvia. 15 July 2015. Retrieved 8 November 2018.
- ↑ "Latvia has the duty to save Europe from drowning in the swamp of political correctness – National Alliance's opinion in debates about annual report on foreign policy 2015". National Alliance. Archived from the original on 20 March 2022. Retrieved 8 November 2018.
- ↑ "Nationalist party blocks looser requirements for hiring guest workers". Public Broadcasting of Latvia. 23 January 2017. Retrieved 8 November 2018.
- ↑ Eglājs, Ritvars. "The new pro-migrant propaganda is just like the old one". National Alliance. Archived from the original on 6 June 2022. Retrieved 8 November 2018.
- ↑ "Politicians want to understand why the number of third-country nationals in Latvia is rising rapidly". Baltic News Network. LETA. 27 November 2025. Retrieved 9 June 2025.
- ↑ Abiks Elkins (11 March 2026). "Latvia can still correct mistakes in the field of migration..." Baltijas Balss. Retrieved 9 June 2026.
- ↑ "Saeima did not make March 16 a national commemoration day". baltictimes.com. Retrieved 28 January 2023.
- ↑ "Saeima rejects National Alliance's proposal to make 16 March an official remembrance day". Baltic News Network. LETA. 15 March 2018. Retrieved 28 January 2023.
- ↑ "National Alliance repeats March 16 memorial request". eng.lsm.lv. Retrieved 28 January 2023.
- ↑ "Many MPs from Latvian National Alliance to participate in March 16 events". The Baltic Course. 2 March 2016. Retrieved 28 January 2023.
- ↑ "10 questions to: the National Alliance". Public Broadcasting of Latvia. 24 September 2018. Retrieved 8 November 2018.
- ↑ Braghiroli, Stefano; Petsinis, Vassilis (February 2019). "Between party-systems and identity-politics: the populist and radical right in Estonia and Latvia". European Politics and Society. 20 (1): 79–96. doi:10.1080/23745118.2019.1569340. hdl:10062/64608.
- 1 2 3 Timofejevs, Pēteris F. (2022). "Radical-Right Parties, their Foreign Policy Positions on Russia and in the European Parliament: A Comparison of Latvia and Estonia". Revue d’études comparatives Est-Ouest (2). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France: 29–53. doi:10.3917/e.receo1.533.0029. ISBN 978-2-13082-829-7.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: periodical has ISBN (link) - ↑ Kažoka, Iveta (December 2022). "Stability Versus Desire for Change: Polarization of Attitudes During Latvia's General Elections of 2022" (PDF). Friedrich Ebert Foundation. Retrieved 9 June 2026.
- ↑ Mārtiņš, Hiršs; Mitrevica, Zane (May 2026). Political spectrums in Latvia: Between post-Soviet legacies and democratic change (PDF). Friedrich Ebert Foundation. ISBN 978-9934-615-34-4. Retrieved 9 June 2026.
External links
[edit]- Official website (in Latvian)
- Nationalist party makes pitch to English speakers. 12 January 2017. Public Broadcasting of Latvia (in English and Latvian)
- 2010 establishments in Latvia
- Anti-abortion organizations
- Anti-globalization political parties
- Anti-immigration politics in Europe
- Conservative parties in Latvia
- Criticism of feminism
- Criticism of multiculturalism
- Defunct political party alliances in Latvia
- European Conservatives and Reformists Group member parties
- European Conservatives and Reformists Party member parties
- Eurosceptic parties in Latvia
- Latvian nationalism
- National conservative parties
- Nationalist parties in Latvia
- Opposition to same-sex marriage in Europe
- Organizations that oppose LGBTQ rights in Europe
- Political parties established in 2011
- Political parties in Latvia
- Political parties that oppose LGBTQ rights in Europe
- Right-wing parties in Europe
- Right-wing populism in Latvia
- Right-wing populist parties
- Socially conservative parties