The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20170530032530/https://steemit.com/steemit/@steemitblog/joint-statement

Joint Statement

2 months ago
69 in steemit


On March 14, 2017, Daniel Larimer resigned as Chief Technology Officer of Steemit, Inc. Steemit, Inc. and Dan wish to confirm to the Steemit community and the public generally that they have parted on amicable terms without dispute. Steemit, Inc. and Dan each look forward to continuing to make valuable contributions to the blockchain and cryptocurrency communities. Steemit, Inc. wishes to thank Dan for his service, and Dan wishes the Steemit officers, employees, and community members continued success in the development of the STEEM blockchain and the Steemit social media platform. 

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
Join our amazing community to comment and reward others.
Sort Order:  trending
·
70
  ·  2 months ago

Lies can be transparent too, so they did cover the "transparency" bit from earlier communications.

·
70
  ·  2 months ago

I just snorted, glad I didn't have liquid in my mouth!

·
69
  ·  last month

lol

65
  ·  2 months ago

Without dispute? Didn't Dan want the code open source and others in Steemit, Inc. did not?

·
63
  ·  2 months ago

He must have dropped it so there is no current dispute.

·
74
  ·  2 months ago

yes, this needs more clarification.

·
68
  ·  last month

Dan wanted a lot of things. He was the one who created the license. He often hit people in the face by suddenly changing his opinion and wanting to redirect things others relied on. All imo of course ;)

I'm glad the waves have calmed, and everyone's going their way! A lot more mature than other dramas on here :D

72
  ·  2 months ago

Seriously, its nice to hear this. You guys put in a ton of work and I have had a great time on the platform. I'm happy to read that things are cool with you.

·
69
  ·  last month

LOL! Great clip to go with this article! ;) :D

58
  ·  2 months ago

thank you for this update. very nice communication.

·
72
  ·  2 months ago

Simple and to the point. "We're good". Cool.

56
  ·  2 months ago

Looks like someone whos name starts with D made up. LOL, you can't make this shit up.

68
  ·  2 months ago

So glad to read this. Thank you.

73
  ·  2 months ago

That is good to know! Thanks for the update.

59
  ·  2 months ago

STEEM ON!

68
  ·  2 months ago

Aw! I love it so very much!

65
  ·  2 months ago

That is fantastic news! Thanks for the communication and also the update-

62
  ·  2 months ago

That's a whale of an informational. Thank you!

74
  ·  2 months ago

thank you for the update on things

58
  ·  2 months ago

Well i wish the best for him and can't wait to see his next endeavor.

68
  ·  2 months ago

Steemon!

72
  ·  2 months ago

How sweet. I love reading @dan's posts and a happy to see he still posts.

63
  ·  2 months ago

Blockchain fest. Some hope that Dan might continue to contribute to Bitshare or Steem BC would have meant something.

71
  ·  2 months ago

So glad to see this. I was worried about a lawsuit at some point the future.

70
  ·  2 months ago

Good a statement was finally put out on this.

I wish everyone the best always.

67
  ·  2 months ago

Glad to see some kind of statement about this... and wish Dan all the best with his future endeavors!

71
  ·  2 months ago

Glad to hear it! The amicable thing that is :0)

70
  ·  2 months ago

Fascinating.

63
  ·  2 months ago

great work! :)

63
  ·  2 months ago

@dan resteemed this, so I guess the joint nature of it is verified, assuming the actual man still controls that account

57
  ·  2 months ago

thank you for everything you have done for steemit far.

66
  ·  2 months ago

haha. 1 month late ;) but finally !

67
  ·  last month

Kiss kiss and let's move on like those mature adults 💃💫

65
  ·  last month

tldr; if Dan isn't busy and wants to throw a few commits to the system, just like anyone else can, he is more than welcome to and may..

You can't give birth to a baby like steemit and have it not hold a special place in your heart. We'll see Dan again.

74
  ·  2 months ago

Actually a 'joint statement' doesn't mean one person talking for another. It means both people are communicating independently in a collaborative fashion.

·
68
  ·  last month

As long as dan doesn't say he disagrees, that statement isn't worth a dime.

//edit: he even resteemed. what are you doing here, just trying to get some attention?

·
·
74
  ·  last month

I am not sure. I felt disillusioned and sort of cheated out of finding out the truth about what the hell was going on. Glad you pointed out that I potentially could be seeking some sort of attention. Definitely a possibility.