- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Temporal evolution and rigidity dependence of the solar modulation lag of Galactic cosmic rays

Nicola Tomassetti, Bruna Bertucci, and Emanuele Fiandrini

  • Dipartimento di Fisica e Geologia, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia 06123 Italy

PDF

Phys. Rev. D 106, 103022 – Published 17 November, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.103022

Abstract

When traveling in the heliosphere, Galactic cosmic rays (CRs) are subjected to the solar modulation effect, a quasiperiodical change of their intensity caused by the 11-year cycle of solar activity. Here we investigate the association of solar activity and cosmic radiation over five solar cycles, from 1965 to 2020, using a collection of multichannel data from neutron monitors, space missions, and solar observatories. In particular, we focus on the time lag between the monthly sunspot number and the CR flux variations. We show that the modulation lag is subjected to a 22-year periodical variation, ranging from about 2 to 14 months and following the polarity cycle of the Sun’s magnetic field. We also show that the lag is remarkably decreasing with increasing energy of the CR particles. These results reflect the interplay of basic physics phenomena that cause the CR modulation effect: the drift motion of charged particles in the interplanetary magnetic field, the latitudinal dependence of the solar wind, the energy dependence of their residence time in the heliosphere. Based on this interpretation, we end up with a global effective formula for the modulation lag and testable predictions for the flux evolution of cosmic particles and antiparticles over the solar cycle.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (68)

  1. M. S. Potgieter, Solar modulation of cosmic rays, Living Rev. Solar Phys. 10, 3 (2013).
  2. M. Durante and F. Cucinotta, Physical basis of radiation protection in space travel, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1245 (2011).
  3. J. W. Norbury, K. Whitman, K. Lee, T. C. Slaba, and F. F. Badavi, Comparison of space radiation GCR models to recent AMS data, Life Sci. Space Res. 18, 64 (2018).
  4. F. Clette and L. Lefèvre, The new sunspot number: Assembling all corrections, Sol. Phys. 291, 2629 (2016).
  5. J. A. Van Allen, On the modulation of galactic cosmic ray intensity during solar activity cycles 19,20,21,22 and early 23, J. Geophys. Res. 27, 2453 (2000).
  6. I. G. Usoskin, G. A. Bazilevskaya, and G. A. Kovaltsov, Solar modulation parameter for cosmic rays since 1936 reconstructed from ground-based neutron monitors and ionization chambers, J. Geophys. Res. 116, A02104 (2011).
  7. F. B. McDonald, Z. Fujii, B. Heikkila, N. Lal, and R. E. McGuire, The radial distribution of galactic cosmic rays in the heliosphere at solar minimum and solar maximum, in Proceedings of the 28-th ICRC Conference (Universal Academy Press, Tokyo, Japan, 2003), 3965-3968.
  8. A. C. Cummings, E. C. Stone, B. C. Heikkila, N. Lal, W. R. Webber, G. Jóhannesson, I. V. Moskalenko, E. Orlando, and T. A. Porter, Galactic cosmic rays in the local interstellar medium: Voyager 1 observations and model results, Astrophys. J. 831, 18 (2016).
  9. M. Wiedenbeck, A. J. Davis, C. M. S. Cohen et al., Time dependence of solar modulation throughout solar cycle 23as inferred from ACE measurements of cosmic-ray energy spectra, in Proceedings of the 31st ICRC—Lodz (Local Organizing Committee of ICRC-2009, Lodz, Poland, 2009), p. 0545.
  10. P. Kühl, R. Gómez-Herrero, and B. Heber, Annual cosmic ray spectra from 250 MeV up to 1.6 GeV from 1995–2014 measured with the electron proton helium instrument onboard SOHO, Sol. Phys. 291, 965 (2016).
  11. O. Adriani, G. C. Barbarino, G. A. Bazilevskaya et al., Time dependence of the proton flux measured by PAMELA during the 2006 July—2009 December solar minimum, Astrophys. J. 765, 91 (2013).
  12. M. Martucci, R. Munini, M. Boezio et al., Proton fluxes measured by the PAMELA experiment from the minimum to the maximum solar activity for solar cycle 24, Astrophys. J. 854, L2 (2018).
  13. M. Aguilar, L. Ali Cavasonza, B. Alpat et al., Observation of Fine Time Structures in the Cosmic Proton and Helium Fluxes with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 051101 (2018).
  14. M. Aguilar, L. Ali Cavasonza, G. Ambrosi et al., The alpha magnetic spectrometer (AMS) on the international space station: Part II—Results from the first seven years, Phys. Rep. 894, 1 (2021).
  15. P. Väisänen, I. G. Usoskin, and K. Mursula, Seven decades of neutron monitors (1951-2019): Overview and evaluation of data sources, J. Geophys. Res. 126, e2020JA028941 (2021).
  16. R. A. Nymmik, Time lag of galactic cosmic ray modulation: Conformity to general regularities and influence on particle energy spectra, Adv. Space Res. 26, 1875 (2000).
  17. I. G. Usoskin, K. Mursula, H. Kananen, and G. A. Kovaltsov, Dependence of cosmic rays on solar activity for odd and even solar cycles, Adv. Space Res. 27, 571 (2001).
  18. M. Singh, Y. P. Singh, and Badruddin, Solar modulation of galactic cosmic rays during the last five solar cycles, J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 70, 169 (2008).
  19. R. P. Kane, Lags and hysteresis loops of cosmic ray intensity versus sunspot numbers: Quantitative estimates for cycles 19–23 and a preliminary indication for cycle 24, Sol. Phys. 289, 2727 (2014).
  20. O. P. M. Aslam and Badruddin, Study of cosmic-ray modulation during the recent unusual minimum and mini-maximum of solar cycle 24, Sol. Phys. 290, 2333 (2015).
  21. P. Chowdhury, K. Kudela, and Y. J. Moon, A study of heliospheric modulation and periodicities of galactic cosmic rays during cycle 24, Sol. Phys. 291, 581 (2016).
  22. E. Ross and W. J. Chaplin, The behaviour of galactic cosmic-ray intensity during solar activity cycle 24, Sol. Phys. 294, 8 (2019).
  23. K. Iskra, M. Siluszyk, M. Alania, and W. Wozniak, Experimental investigation of the delay time in galactic cosmic ray flux in different epochs of solar magnetic cycles: 1959–2014, Sol. Phys. 294, 115 (2019).
  24. S. A. Koldobskiy, R. Kähkönen, B. Hofer, N. A. Krivova, G. A. Kovaltsov, and I. G. Usoskin, Time lag between cosmic-ray and solar variability: Sunspot numbers and open solar magnetic flux, Sol. Phys. 297, 38 (2022).
  25. N. Tomassetti, M. Orcinha, F. Barao, and B. Bertucci, Evidence for a time lag in solar modulation of galactic cosmic rays, Astrophys. J. Lett. 849, L32 (2017).
  26. V. K. Mishra and A. P. Mishra, Long-term modulation of cosmic-ray intensity and correlation analysis using solar and heliospheric parameters, Sol. Phys. 293, 141 (2018).
  27. K. Nagashima and I. Morishita, Long term modulation of cosmic rays and inferable electromagnetic state in solar modulating region, Planet. Space Sci. 28, 177 (1980).
  28. J. Xanthakis, H. Mavromichalaki, and B. Petropoulos, Cosmic-ray intensity related to solar and terrestrial activity indices in solar cycle No. 20, Astrophys. Space Sci. 74, 303 (1981).
  29. H. Mavromichalaki and B. Petropoulos, Time-lag of cosmic-ray intensity, Astrophys. Space Sci. 106, 61 (1984).
  30. I. V. Dorman and L. I. Dorman, Solar wind properties obtained from the study of the l 1-year cosmic-ray cycle, I, J. Geophys. Res. 72, 1513 (1967).
  31. Y. Wang, J. Guo, G. Li, E. Roussos, and J. Zhao, Cosmic ray intensity variation lags sunspot number: Implications of late opening of solar magnetic field, Astrophys. J. 928, 157 (2022).
  32. T. C. Slaba and K. Whitman, The Badhwar O’Neill 2020 GCR Model, Space Weather 18, e2020SW002456 (2020).
  33. N. V. Kuznetsov, H. Popova, and M. I. Panasyuk, Empirical model of long-time variations of galactic cosmic ray particle fluxes, J. Geophys. Res. 122, 1463 (2017).
  34. D. Matthia, T. Berger, A. I. Mrigakshi, and G. Reitz, A ready-to-use galactic cosmic ray model, Adv. Space Res. 51, 329 (2013).
  35. P. M. O’Neill, Badhwar O’Neill 2010 galactic cosmic ray flux model-Revised, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 57, 3148 (2010).
  36. J. H. Adams, A. F. Barghouty, M. H. Mendenhall et al., CRÈME: The 2011 revision of the cosmic ray effects on micro-electronics code, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 59, 3141 (2011); A. J. Tylka, J. H. Adams, Jr., P. R. Boberg et al., CREME96: A revision of the cosmic ray effects on micro-electronics code, 44, 2150 (1997).
  37. L. L. Zhao and G. Qin, An observation-based GCR model of heavy nuclei: Measurements from CRIS onboard ACE spacecraft, J. Geophys. Res. 118, 1837 (2013).
  38. N. Tomassetti, F. Barao, B. Bertucci, J. L. Figueiredo, J. B. Lousada, and M. Orcinha, Testing Diffusion of Cosmic Rays in the Heliosphere with Proton and Helium Data from AMS, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 251104 (2018).
  39. N. Tomassetti, F. Barao, B. Bertucci, E. Fiandrini, and M. Orcinha, Numerical modeling of cosmic-ray transport in the heliopshere and interpretation of the proton-to-helium ratio in Solar Cycle 24, Adv. Space Res. 64, 2477 (2019).
  40. N. Tomassetti, Cosmic-ray protons, nuclei, electrons, and antiparticles under a two-halo scenario of diffusive propagation, Phys. Rev. D 92, 081301(R) (2015).
  41. J. Feng, N. Tomassetti, and A. Oliva, Bayesian analysis of spatial-dependent cosmic-ray propagation: Astrophysical background of antiprotons and positrons, Phys. Rev. D 94, 123007 (2016).
  42. M. Aguilar, D. Aisa, B. Alpat et al., Precision Measurement of the Proton Flux in Primary Cosmic Rays from Rigidity 1 GV to 1.8 TV with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 171103 (2015).
  43. M. Aguilar, D. Aisa, B. Alpat et al., Precision Measurement of the Helium Flux in Primary Cosmic Rays of Rigidities 1.9 GV to 3 TV with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 211101 (2015).
  44. M. Aguilar, L. Ali Cavansonza, G. Ambrosi et al., Precision Measurement of the Boron to Carbon Flux Ratio in Cosmic Rays from 1.9 GV to 2.6 TV with the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 231102 (2016).
  45. L. J. Gleeson and W. I. Axford, Solar modulation of galactic cosmic rays, Astrophys. J. 154, 1011 (1968).
  46. R. A. Caballero-Lopez and H. Moraal, Limitations of the force field equation todescribe cosmic ray modulatio, J. Geophys. Res. 109, A01101 (2004).
  47. D. Maurin, A. Cheminet, L. Derome, A. Ghelfi, and G. Hubert, Neutron monitors and muon detectors for solar modulation studies: Interstellar flux, yield function, and assessment of critical parameters in count rate calculations, Adv. Space Res. 55, 363 (2015).
  48. N. Tomassetti, Testing universality of cosmic-ray acceleration with proton/helium data from AMS and Voyager-1, Adv. Space Res. 60, 815 (2017).
  49. M. J. Boschini, S. Della Torre, M. Gervasi et al., Solution of heliospheric propagation: Unveiling the local interstellar spectra of cosmic-ray species, Astrophys. J. 840, 115 (2017).
  50. M. J. Boschini, S. Della Torre, M. Gervasi, G. La Vacca, and P. G. Rancoita, The HelMod model in the works for inner and outer heliosphere: From AMS to Voyager probes observations, Adv. Space Res. 64, 2459 (2019).
  51. M. S. Potgieter, The charge-sign dependent effect in the solar modulation of cosmic rays, Adv. Space Res. 53, 1415 (2014).
  52. E. Fiandrini, N. Tomassetti, B. Bertucci, F. Donnini, M. Graziani, B. Khiali, and A. Reina Conde, Numerical modeling of cosmic rays in the heliosphere: Analysis of proton data from AMS-02 and PAMELA, Phys. Rev. D 104, 023012 (2021).
  53. A. Gil, I. G. Usoskin, G. A. Kovaltsov, A. L. Mishev, C. Corti, and V. Bindi, Can we properly model the neutron monitor count rate?, J. Geophys. Res. 120, 7172 (2015).
  54. A. L. Mishev, S. A. Koldobskiy, G. A. Kovaltsov, A. Gil, and I. G. Usoskin, Updated neutron-monitor yield function: Bridging between in situ and ground-based cosmic ray measurements, J. Geophys. Res. 125, JA027433 (2020).
  55. A. Cheminet, G. Hubert, V. Lacoste, D. Maurin, and L. Derome, Cosmic ray solar modulation and Forbush decrease analyses based on atmospheric neutron spectrometry at mountain altitude and GEANT4 simulations of extensive air showers, J. Geophys. Res. 118, 7488 (2013).
  56. D. F. Smart and M. A. Shea, A review of geomagnetic cutoff rigidities for earth-orbiting spacecraft, Adv. Space Res. 36, 2012 (2005).
  57. E. G. Cordaro, P. Venegas-Aravena, and D. Laroze, Variations of geomagnetic cutoff rigidity in the southern hemisphere close to 70° W (South-Atlantic Anomaly and Antarctic zones) in the period 1975–2010, Adv. Space Res. 63, 2290 (2019).
  58. N. Tomassetti, Solar and nuclear physics uncertainties in cosmic-ray propagation, Phys. Rev. D 96, 103005 (2017).
  59. J. Gieseler, B. Heber, and K. Herbst, An empirical modification of the force field approach to describe the modulation of galactic cosmic rays close to earth in a broad range of rigidities, J. Geophys. Res. 122, 10964 (2017).
  60. Z. N. Shen, G. Qin, Z. Pingbing, F. Wei, and X. Xu, A study of variations of galactic cosmic-ray intensity based on a hybrid data- processing method, Astrophys. J. 900, 143 (2020).
  61. J. J. O’Gallagher, A time-dependent diffusion-convection model for the long-term modulation of cosmic rays, Astrophys. J. 197, 495 (1975).
  62. R. D. Strauss, M. S. Potgieter, A. Kopp, and I. Büsching, On the propagation times and energy losses of cosmic rays in the heliosphere, J. Geophys. Res. 116, A12105 (2011).
  63. I. G. Usoskin, G. A. Kovaltsov, H. Kananen, K. Mursula, and P. J. Tanskanen, Phase evolution of solar activity and cosmic-ray variation cycles, Sol. Phys. 170, 447 (1997).
  64. A. Alanko, I. Usoskin, K. Mursula, and G. A. Kovaltsov, Heliospheric modulation strength: Effective neutron monitor energy, Adv. Space Res. 32, 615 (2003).
  65. A. Gil, E. Asvestari, G. A. Kovaltsov, and I. G. Usoskin, Heliospheric modulation of galactic cosmic rays: Effective energy of ground-based detectors, Proc. Sci. ICRC2017 (2018) 032.
  66. E. Asvestari, A. Gil, G. A. Kovaltsov, and I. G. Usoskin, Neutron monitors and cosmogenic isotopes as cosmic ray energy-integration detectors: Effective yield functions, effective energy, and its dependence on the local interstellar spectrum, J. Geophys. Res. 122, 9790 (2017).
  67. S. A. Koldobskiy, G. A. Kovaltsov, and I. G. Usoskin, Effective rigidity of a polar neutron monitor for recording ground-level enhancement, Sol. Phys. 293, 110 (2018).
  68. C. R. Zhu, Q. Yuan, and D. M. Wei, Studies on cosmic ray nuclei with Voyager, ACE and AMS-02: I. local interstellar spectra and solar modulation, Astrophys. J. 863, 119 (2018).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 106, 103022– Published 17 November, 2022
  • Received 10 June 2021
  • Revised 1 June 2022
  • Accepted 7 October 2022
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation