Conversation
Note: This also syncs handling of private key decryption errors with 3006.x - the changes were dropped during a merge forward because the logic migrated from the state module to utils.
lkubb
changed the title
x509_v2 fixes from 3006.xx509_v2 fixes from 3006.x, part 1
twangboy
approved these changes
Oct 1, 2026
3 tasks done
This branch was successfully deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
x509_v2#69894 to3008.x. Unsure why it's missing, it was merged forward in Merge forward 3007.x into 3008.x #70132. A similar fate seems to have befallen Fix handling of GeneralNames and basicConstraints in x509_v2 #70047 - also absent in3008.x(edit: rebase in Rescuex509_v2fixes from 3006.x, part 2 #70343).salt/utils/x509.py.x509_v2wrapper docstrings accordingly.What issues does this PR fix or reference?
Ref: #69955 and #69894
Merge requirements satisfied?
Commits signed with GPG?
Yes