You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Inaccurate wording in documentation of lqe and dlqe #1183
My sense is that using the term "generalized variance" is a bit more technical detail than we need here. The standard estimation setup is to minimize the mean squared error (= trace of the covariance matrix), so I think using that wording is fine for the summary. We could add something in the notes section about the fact that this is equivalent to minimizing the trace of the covariance matrix.
Two examples of the "minimize the mean squared error" wording:
Activity
murrayrm commentedon Nov 9, 2025
My sense is that using the term "generalized variance" is a bit more technical detail than we need here. The standard estimation setup is to minimize the mean squared error (= trace of the covariance matrix), so I think using that wording is fine for the summary. We could add something in the notes section about the fact that this is equivalent to minimizing the trace of the covariance matrix.
Two examples of the "minimize the mean squared error" wording:
Having said that, I find the wording "expected squared error" to be a bit odd and would support just saying "mean squared error".