Simulate time discrete system in periodic cycles #1098

Activity

1. sawyerbfuller commented on Jan 17, 2025

   

   sawyerbfuller

   on Jan 17, 2025 via email

   Contributor

   More actions

   Hi ht, from what you have described, you are not interested in the frequency response, which refers to its particular response to constant-amplitude sinusoid , but instead to a time-varying sinusoid. For that, you would probably want to construct the desired input sinusoids, and then simulate your system’s response to it using *ct.forced-response*. Sawyer Fuller Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering Adjunct, Paul G Allen School of Computer Science University of Washington https://faculty.washington.edu/minster/ https://depts.washington.edu/airlab/ (Typed with my thumbs)

   …

   On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 2:17 AM ht250763 ***@***.***> wrote: Hello, kindly ask you to assist in solving following problem: I defined a time discrete state space system. Now I would like to use this system in order to simulate it in periodic cycles (e.g. once per second). In each cycle the system will be fed with new inputs and the states of the previous cycles and the outputs shall be simulated just for one step. What would be the best approach? Kind regards ht — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/python-control/python-control/issues/1098__;!!K-Hz7m0Vt54!jwFDCsR_XZ2LPXiRAd5OBH2F3I7LLPXsz3bW6o84suSjcTNZyIQ_Lq6gEYy0JxEcRAHBNlMBjFrGR4pg_JqysA$>, or unsubscribe <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AN74SSOTJEFJOZ7L4ODVDE32LDKFFAVCNFSM6AAAAABVLSTQ6KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSG44TKMBXGY4TGNI__;!!K-Hz7m0Vt54!jwFDCsR_XZ2LPXiRAd5OBH2F3I7LLPXsz3bW6o84suSjcTNZyIQ_Lq6gEYy0JxEcRAHBNlMBjFrGR4q92zWXog$> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
2. slivingston

   added

   discussion

   on Jan 17, 2025
3. python-control

   locked and limited conversation to collaborators on Feb 2, 2025
4. murrayrm

   converted this issue into a discussion #1115 on Feb 2, 2025