Repository navigation
[Reverted] Fixes to union simplification, isinstance and more #3025
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
19 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c53e0ca
Fixes to union simplification and isinstance
JukkaL dc62a99
Fix #2978.
JukkaL 07d64f5
Add test case
JukkaL 0beffee
Fix test failures
JukkaL e3ff2c7
Fix meet of a broken named tuple and a good named tuple
JukkaL 4cb8673
Fix erasing union types
JukkaL fc57a76
Remove references to Void
JukkaL 9cf9114
Proper subtype checks use type promotions
JukkaL d406157
Don't call union simplification during semantic analysis
JukkaL d745a50
Add union simplification test cases
JukkaL a638e72
Address review feedback
JukkaL ca511d8
Fix test case failures
JukkaL 807924c
Flatten Optional[Union[...]] types
JukkaL ef46cfa
Add TODO comment about make_simplified_union
JukkaL 6cd09f1
Add test case
JukkaL 39f94a1
Partially address comments about type object types
JukkaL 0826cc3
Fixes to TypedDict proper subtype checks + add tests
JukkaL baafcd1
Merge branch 'master' into proper-subtype
JukkaL a06b41c
Merge branch 'master' into proper-subtype
JukkaL File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Add union simplification test cases
- Loading branch information
commit d745a50e7283eaadbc6e91e1e6939efee8769c3d
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Union[Type[Any], Type[object]]andUnion[type, Type[object]]should give the same result, sincetypeis equivalent toType[Any](at least it is what PEP 484 says). Maybe this could be fixed by adding a special case in spirit of #3012 at the end ofvisit_type_type.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is not feasible since
Type[Any]andtypehave different internal representations. We can't have two different types being proper subtypes of each other unless they are the same type -- otherwise the subtyping relation doesn't form a lattice.