Repository navigation
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
gh-150751: Handle duplicate Content-Length headers in http.client #159495
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
gh-150751: Handle duplicate Content-Length headers in http.client #159495
Changes from all commits
63a539fFile filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Jump to
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
HTTPResponse.begin() framed the body with the first Content-Length header and ignored any others, so a response with two differing values was read using the first one while the rest of the body stayed on the connection and corrupted the next response on a keep-alive connection. A comma-separated list of identical values ("7, 7"), which a proxy produces when it combines repeated fields, was treated as malformed and the body was read until the connection closed. RFC 9112, section 6.3 says that an invalid Content-Length makes the message framing invalid, unless it is a comma-separated list of identical values, which is then used as that single value; repeated fields are equivalent to such a list (RFC 9110, section 5.3). Collect the distinct values: a single one is used as before, several are treated like an invalid header (the body is read until close and the connection is not reused), as Go and h11 do.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There are no files selected for viewing
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.