Skip to content

Pdb can't use the commands through -c or .pdbrc files #90095

Closed
Closed
Pdb can't use the commands through -c or .pdbrc files#90095
Labels
3.11only security fixes3.12only security fixesrelease-blockerstdlibStandard Library Python modules in the Lib/ directory

Description

@Zrincet
Zrincet
mannequin
opened on Nov 30, 2021
BPO 45937
Nosy @Zrincet

Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.

Show more details

GitHub fields:

assignee = None
closed_at = None
created_at = <Date 2021-11-30.03:36:50.577>
labels = ['3.8', 'library']
title = "Pdb can't use the commands through -c or .pdbrc files"
updated_at = <Date 2021-11-30.03:36:50.577>
user = 'https://github.com/Zrincet'

bugs.python.org fields:

activity = <Date 2021-11-30.03:36:50.577>
actor = 'Zrincet'
assignee = 'none'
closed = False
closed_date = None
closer = None
components = ['Library (Lib)']
creation = <Date 2021-11-30.03:36:50.577>
creator = 'Zrincet'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 45937
keywords = []
message_count = 1.0
messages = ['407350']
nosy_count = 1.0
nosy_names = ['Zrincet']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = None
stage = None
status = 'open'
superseder = None
type = None
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue45937'
versions = ['Python 3.8']

Linked PRs

Activity

  1. Zrincet commented on Nov 30, 2021

    @Zrincet
    Zrincetmannequin
    on Nov 30, 2021
    MannequinAuthor

    I have a python file:

    def do_something():
    pass

def main():
    a = 1
    b = 2
    c = a+b
    print(f"c:{c}")
    pass

if __name__ == '__main__':
    main()

    I run this command:

    python -m pdb -c "b 5" -c "commands 1;;do_something();;end" -c "c" main.py

    It doesn't work.
    And I have a .pdbrc file

    b 5
    commands 1
    do_something()
    end
    c

    It doesn't work either.

  2. Zrincet
    added
    3.8 (EOL)end of life
    stdlibStandard Library Python modules in the Lib/ directory
    on Nov 30, 2021
  3. ezio-melotti
    transferred this issue fromon Apr 10, 2022

  4. Delengowski commented on Mar 3, 2023

    @Delengowski
    Delengowski
    on Mar 3, 2023
    Contributor

    Would I be able to get some clarification if this is even supposed to be possible? I myself had a desire to do this and have performed the necessary setup to make an attempt at making this possible but given the long standing stack overflow post about this, I'm not sure if this is even a bug or not.

    https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2013698/commands-for-breakpoints-in-a-pdbrc-file

  5. iritkatriel
    added a commit that references this issue on Mar 11, 2024

    gh-90095: Make .pdbrc work properly and add some reasonable tests (#1…

    44f9a84

  6. gaogaotiantian commented on Mar 11, 2024

    @gaogaotiantian
    gaogaotiantian
    on Mar 11, 2024
    Member

    This is fixed now, you can define any commands/aliases in .pdbrc as you want.

  7. gaogaotiantian
    closed this as completedon Mar 11, 2024

  8. Zrincet commented on Mar 12, 2024

    @Zrincet
    Zrincet
    on Mar 12, 2024
    Author

    This is fixed now, you can define any commands/aliases in .pdbrc as you want.

    Just wanted to drop a quick thank you for fixing this bug that's been lurking around for ages. Huge relief to see it finally squashed!

  9. gaogaotiantian
    added 2 commits that reference this issue on Mar 12, 2024

    [3.11] pythongh-90095: Make .pdbrc work properly and add some reasona…

    2d49ba0

    [3.12] pythongh-90095: Make .pdbrc work properly and add some reasona…

    76c2c8a
  10. iritkatriel
    added 2 commits that reference this issue on Mar 12, 2024

    [3.12] gh-90095: Make .pdbrc work properly and add some reasonable te… (

    d19c2eb

    [3.11] gh-90095: Make .pdbrc work properly and add some reasonable te… (

    b17d347

  11. 15 remaining items

  12. gaogaotiantian commented on Mar 14, 2024

    @gaogaotiantian
    gaogaotiantian
    on Mar 14, 2024
    Member

    Okay I'll do a PR to keep the consistency of the behavior and update the docs (in a way that can be applied to 3.12 and 3.11 as well because no behavior is changed).

  13. iritkatriel
    added a commit that references this issue on Mar 15, 2024

    gh-90095: Ignore empty lines and comments in `.pdbrc` (#116834)

    a50cf6c
  14. miss-islington
    added 2 commits that reference this issue on Mar 15, 2024

    pythongh-90095: Ignore empty lines and comments in `.pdbrc` (pythonGH…

    1cbc90e

    pythongh-90095: Ignore empty lines and comments in `.pdbrc` (pythonGH…

    a93a62a
  15. iritkatriel
    added 2 commits that reference this issue on Mar 15, 2024

    [3.12] gh-90095: Ignore empty lines and comments in `.pdbrc` (GH-116834…

    abd0798

    [3.11] gh-90095: Ignore empty lines and comments in `.pdbrc` (GH-116834…

    eaefa0b

  16. gaogaotiantian commented on Mar 15, 2024

    @gaogaotiantian
    gaogaotiantian
    on Mar 15, 2024
    Member

    Okay we restored the behavior for 3.12 and 3.11, and we also updated the docs to clarify the behavior of .pdbrc. I'll close this. Let us know if there are more stuff to do for the matter.

  17. gaogaotiantian
    closed this as completedon Mar 15, 2024
  18. github-project-automation
    moved this from Todo to Done in Release and Deferred blockers 🚫on Mar 15, 2024

  19. wbolster commented on Mar 15, 2024

    @wbolster
    wbolster
    on Mar 15, 2024
    Contributor

    wow, that was quick. thanks 🙏🏼

  20. vstinner
    added a commit that references this issue on Mar 20, 2024

    pythongh-90095: Ignore empty lines and comments in `.pdbrc` (python#1…

    4ccb227
  21. adorilson
    added 2 commits that reference this issue on Mar 25, 2024

    pythongh-90095: Make .pdbrc work properly and add some reasonable tes…

    3582718

    pythongh-90095: Ignore empty lines and comments in `.pdbrc` (python#1…

    7fe3061
  22. diegorusso
    added 2 commits that reference this issue on Apr 17, 2024

    pythongh-90095: Make .pdbrc work properly and add some reasonable tes…

    10b2399

    pythongh-90095: Ignore empty lines and comments in `.pdbrc` (python#1…

    3c159c5
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    3.11only security fixes3.12only security fixesrelease-blockerstdlibStandard Library Python modules in the Lib/ directory

    Projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions