BPO | [40616](https://bugs.python.org/issue40616) --- | :--- Nosy | @asvetlov, @1st1, @lig PRs | python/cpython#20071 *Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.* Show more details GitHub fields: ```python assignee = None closed_at = created_at = labels = ['expert-asyncio'] title = 'Add `asyncio.BufferQueue`' updated_at = user = 'https://github.com/lig' ``` bugs.python.org fields: ```python activity = actor = 'lig' assignee = 'none' closed = True closed_date = closer = 'lig' components = ['asyncio'] creation = creator = 'lig' dependencies = [] files = [] hgrepos = [] issue_num = 40616 keywords = [] message_count = 1.0 messages = ['368788'] nosy_count = 3.0 nosy_names = ['asvetlov', 'yselivanov', 'lig'] pr_nums = ['20071'] priority = 'normal' resolution = None stage = 'resolved' status = 'closed' superseder = None type = None url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue40616' versions = [] ``` ### Linked PRs * gh-104920
Activity
lig commentedon May 13, 2020
It looks handy to be able to leverage
collections.dequeability to be sized itasyncio.Queue.This could provide the ability to implement backpressure in the queue or just use it as a buffer in messaging systems.
The implementation provided in the linked PR.
pythongh-84796: Add back UTC to datetime.__all__
gh-84976: Add back UTC to datetime.__all__ (#104920)
pythongh-84976: Add back UTC to datetime.__all__ (pythonGH-104920)