Repository navigation
Add GromacsEngine to docs - #901
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Member
Author
|
This is ready for review. Only involves docs. Will leave up for 24 hours, merging no earlier than Thurs 20 Feb. |
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We've had the Gromacs engine working in OPS since version 1.1, and the docstrings were in place and there was an example in the
examples/directory. However, none of this stuff had made it to the website. This PR puts it there.While I'm at it, I'm going to try to clean up a few complaints that I see coming from sphinx.