Repository navigation
Fix typos of "Generalized" in GUFunc-related code - #8336
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Member
Author
|
gpuci run tests |
gmarkall
force-pushed
the
fix-gufunc-typo
branch
from
August 10, 2022 11:12
6c60935 to
20059d3
Compare
Member
Author
|
gpuci run tests |
gmarkall
commented
Aug 10, 2022
stuartarchibald
added
4 - Waiting on reviewer
stuartarchibald
approved these changes
Aug 10, 2022
stuartarchibald
left a comment
stuartarchibald
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the patch.
stuartarchibald
added
5 - Ready to merge
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This typo has annoyed me for long enough. As in https://numpy.org/doc/stable/reference/c-api/generalized-ufuncs.html, it should be Generalized, not Generialized.