You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Per the spec, cyclic input object fields of non-nullable list type with non-nullable items are valid since the field value can be an empty list. However, the NoUnbrokenInputCycles rule reports these input objects as invalid.
Hello, this issue has been inactive for 60 days, so we're marking it as stale. If you would like to continue this discussion, please comment within the next 30 days or we'll close the issue.
Verified against current master: this is still reproducible. Adding the SDL regression test for the issue fails with [self!] forms an unsatisfiable cycle before the fix.
Opened #4386 with the fix and regression coverage.
Activity
Fix #4214: Non-null list types should not be treated as unsatisfiable…
github-actions commentedon Mar 25, 2026
Hello, this issue has been inactive for 60 days, so we're marking it as stale. If you would like to continue this discussion, please comment within the next 30 days or we'll close the issue.
RafeArnold commentedon Mar 25, 2026
2cca660 appears to be a fix for this issue. Is it possible for this to be merged, @dondonz?
dondonz commentedon Mar 25, 2026
Hello thanks for reporting, will come back to this shortly
andimarek commentedon May 19, 2026
Verified against current master: this is still reproducible. Adding the SDL regression test for the issue fails with
[self!] forms an unsatisfiable cyclebefore the fix.Opened #4386 with the fix and regression coverage.