Codecov Report

Merging #264 into master will increase coverage by 0.06%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #264      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.49%   88.55%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files          20       20              
  Lines         739      743       +4     
  Branches       57       58       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits          654      658       +4     
  Misses         85       85

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a142721...2982bf5. Read the comment docs.

this just create the motif pattern as a string?

Yes. I was searching for Cypher like syntax for (v1)-[*1..5]->(v2) pattern, but I was not able to find it. For a query to find some relations in depth, typing the long pattern manually was not good experience actually. It is just a starting point, and applying any better idea will be appreciated.

I see. Kinda like this http://graphframes.github.io/user-guide.html#tab_python_3

Would it more useful to implement support for variable pattern (v1)-[*1..5]->(v2)? It shouldn't be very difficult to do..

Right. But, I am not sure about the syntax is good enough. When I google it literally as it is, it detects the query from a bot and blocks my browser. The other concern is, if it is only for Neo4j not open Cyper standards, will it be ok to use?

I think that's Cypher syntax right? I think that's good to have.
https://www.opencypher.org/
https://s3.amazonaws.com/artifacts.opencypher.org/openCypher9.pdf
"Variable-length pattern matching"

Great! Variable-length pattern matching!

Hello @goungoun ! Thanks for that! Any chance you resolve the merge-conflicts and update the PR?

Hello @SemyonSinchenko! Thanks for reminding me.
This PR has been open for a long time without progress. I am sorry for that. It happened to be closed automatically while synchronizing my repository, but let me continue to look at how I can reflect @felixcheung's advice.

@SemyonSinchenko, I opened a new PR to continue on the feature.
#685