Skip to content

Unify ACL handling between storage and bigquery #999

Closed

Description

@tseaver

From: #986 (comment)

The notion of ACLs might be pertinent for other discovery-based APIs, too (e.g., why does pubsub not have it?)

Activity

  1. dhermes commented on Aug 27, 2015

    @dhermes
    Contributor

    @tseaver Is this ever going to happen? (I.e. is it feasible?)

  2. tseaver commented on Aug 31, 2015

    @tseaver
    ContributorAuthor

    Because storage has separate APIs for its ACLs, it may not be feasible to unify the two.

  3. dhermes commented on Aug 31, 2015

    @dhermes
    Contributor

    Can we move from "may not" to "will" or "won't" and then close this our (it it's "won't") or commit to it.

  4. tseaver commented on Sep 1, 2015

    @tseaver
    ContributorAuthor

    I'd say "let's not".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

api: bigqueryIssues related to the BigQuery API.api: storageIssues related to the Cloud Storage API.

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions