Repository navigation
Fix IMP-004 exemption for dispatch-workflow work_queue_workflows - #65524
Conversation
Co-authored-by: pelikhan <4175913+pelikhan@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Copilot review overview
🟢 Approval recommended
The narrow exemption matches compiler behavior and introduces no unresolved issues.
Review effort: Balanced
Findings: None
What changed in this PR
Fixes the IMP-004 false positive for a compiler-populated dispatch-workflow field, addressing #65523.
Changes:
- Adds
work_queue_workflowsto the compiler-populated field exemptions. - Leaves schema and runtime behavior unchanged.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
scripts/check-safe-outputs-conformance.sh |
Exempts the internal field from schema conformance checks. |
💡 Add a code-review agent skill for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.
|
@copilot address the following outstanding work in one pass:
Push the necessary fixes, reply to each listed review thread and resolve it when addressed. Ignore feedback already answered or resolved. Use the pr-finisher skill and stop when only human review or CI remains; do not trigger CI. Sous-chef head: c75c5ba
|
…ork-queue-workflows-to-allowlist Co-authored-by: gh-aw-bot <259018956+gh-aw-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
Merged latest |
|
🎉 This pull request is included in a new release. Release: |
IMP-004 incorrectly flags
dispatch-workflow.work_queue_workflowsas missing from the frontmatter schema. The field is compiler-populated, not user-authored.safe-outputs.dispatch-workflow.work_queue_workflowstocompiler_populated_fields, alongsideworkflow_filesandaw_context_workflows.