Skip to content

CWG1670 auto as conversion-type-id #2409

Description

@jensmaurer

Considering reflector traffic, parts of CWG appear to be gravitating towards making declarations of "operator auto" ill-formed.

Soliciting EWG approval of that direction.

See CWG1670 for details.

Activity

  1. je4d commented on Nov 8, 2025

    @je4d
    Collaborator

    EWG discussed this in Kona on Friday afternoon and took the following polls:

    CWG1670: EWG agrees with CWG's direction of making use of placeholders in conversion-type-ids ill-formed

    SF F N A SA
    15 10 0 1 0

    consensus.

    CWG1670: EWG would like to resolve CWG1670 by deprecating use of placeholders in conversion-type-ids in either C++26 or C++29, at CWG's discretion

    SF F N A SA
    2 7 5 5 5

    not consensus.

  2. added and removed
    EWGEvolution
    on Nov 8, 2025
  3. moved this to Ready for review in CWGon Nov 8, 2025
  4. moved this from Ready for review to Approved for plenary vote in CWGon Nov 8, 2025
  5. jensmaurer commented on Nov 8, 2025

    @jensmaurer
    MemberAuthor

    CWG 2025-11-07: Approved CWG1670 for plenary vote.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    • Status
      Approved for plenary vote

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions