Repository navigation
P2533R0 Core Language Working Group "ready" - #5287
Conversation
jensmaurer
changed the title
45b8ed7 to
e941a31
Compare
| \end{itemize} | ||
|
|
||
| \pnum | ||
| A conversion function shall have no non-object parameters and |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The core issue doesn't include "non-object".
I suppose you added it to account for explicit object parameters.
Is that really enough? No need to restrict it to an explicit object parameter, but any amount of non-object parameters is OK? Is there wording elsewhere that make these cases ill-formed, and thus saying "non-object" is enough?
How about the function type specified below? Does it need a revision, too?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think the paper misrepresents the status quo? So tihs seems like a "plausible merge".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A conversion function with an explicit this parameter seems plausible, but there must not be other parameters. Further cleanup (if any) should be in a separate editorial or core issue.
3 participants
Fixes #5257
Fixes #4843
Fixes #2338
Fixes cplusplus/papers#1196