Skip to content

[basic.fundamental] Clarify unspecified representation - #5087

Open
jensmaurer wants to merge 1 commit into
cplusplus:mainfrom
jensmaurer:c45
Open

jensmaurer wants to merge 1 commit into
cplusplus:mainfrom
jensmaurer:c45

Conversation

@jensmaurer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes #4893

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added the cwg Issue must be reviewed by CWG. label Nov 4, 2021
@jensmaurer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@tkoeppe

tkoeppe commented Nov 12, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CWG meeting consensus Nov 11: this should become a CWG issue.

@tkoeppe tkoeppe added the not-editorial Issue is not deemed editorial; the editorial issue is kept open for tracking. label Nov 12, 2023
@jensmaurer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

CWG2827

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cwg Issue must be reviewed by CWG. not-editorial Issue is not deemed editorial; the editorial issue is kept open for tracking.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[basic.fundamental] Unsigned integral type representation is neither unspecified nor implementation-defined CWG2827

2 participants