[istream.iterator.cons] uses no-longer-defined term "constant initializer" #4954

Activity

1. JohelEGP commented on Oct 1, 2021

   

   JohelEGP

   on Oct 1, 2021

   Last edited by JohelEGP

   Contributor

   More actions

   The resolution for https://wg21.link/LWG3600 (from @jwakely) is going to introduce another use for it. I suppose that's how you noticed and so he might already be aware of it. I'm calling it out loud just in case.
2. jwakely commented on Oct 1, 2021

   

   jwakely

   on Oct 1, 2021

   Member

   More actions

   Yes, and we've already decided that new proposed wording is wrong and needs to change again.
3. frederick-vs-ja commented on Aug 22, 2025

   

   frederick-vs-ja

   on Aug 22, 2025

   Contributor

   More actions

   Looks like yet another case for LWG2833.
4. jensmaurer commented on Aug 22, 2025

   

   jensmaurer

   on Aug 22, 2025

   Member

   More actions

   @Dani-Hub , do you wish to integrate the undefined term "constant initializer" into LWG2833 ?
5. Dani-Hub commented on Aug 22, 2025

   

   Dani-Hub

   on Aug 22, 2025

   Member

   More actions

   Sure, I can do that
6. jensmaurer

   added

   lwgIssue must be reviewed by LWG.Issue must be reviewed by LWG.

   not-editorialIssue is not deemed editorial; the editorial issue is kept open for tracking.Issue is not deemed editorial; the editorial issue is kept open for tracking.

   on Aug 22, 2025
7. Dani-Hub commented on Aug 22, 2025

   

   Dani-Hub

   on Aug 22, 2025

   Member

   More actions

   I updated now LWG 2833 by a commenting note.