Repository navigation
[basic.scope.class] CWG 2331: is redundant #1169
Description
The first four paragraphs of [basic.scope.class] (3.3.7) are somewhat reduntant. As @zygoloid noted:
- The normative paragraphs are 4 and 2.
- Paragraph 1 is subsumed by p4.
- Paragraph 3 follows from existing rules for name hiding.
We felt that this was too much to reword editorially though and would like CWG guidance. We could produce a pull request and let CWG decide whether the change is editorial, and if not the proposed wording could be moved into a Core issue.
Activity
jensmaurer commentedon Dec 6, 2016
Did someone e-mail Mike Miller already?
tkoeppe commentedon Dec 6, 2016
@jensmaurer: Not yet. Could you perhaps? Will you be in the upcoming teleconference?
jensmaurer commentedon Dec 7, 2016
Sent e-mail to Mike Miller.
Yes, I will join the teleconference next Monday.
[-][basic.scope.class] is redundant[/-][+][basic.scope.class] CWG 2331: is redundant[/+]jensmaurer commentedon Jul 21, 2018
see CWG 2331
zygoloid commentedon Nov 7, 2018
Closing now we are tracking this as a core issue.