Repository navigation
[basic.scope.class] CWG 2331: is redundant #1169
Description
Activity
Did someone e-mail Mike Miller already?
@jensmaurer: Not yet. Could you perhaps? Will you be in the upcoming teleconference?
Sent e-mail to Mike Miller.
Yes, I will join the teleconference next Monday.
- changed the title
[-][basic.scope.class] is redundant[/-][+][basic.scope.class] CWG 2331: is redundant[/+]on Apr 13, 2018 see CWG 2331
Closing now we are tracking this as a core issue.
The first four paragraphs of [basic.scope.class] (3.3.7) are somewhat reduntant. As @zygoloid noted:
We felt that this was too much to reword editorially though and would like CWG guidance. We could produce a pull request and let CWG decide whether the change is editorial, and if not the proposed wording could be moved into a Core issue.