CWG2689 [basic.fundamental] No mention of cv std::nullptr_t in basic.fundamental #223

Activity

1. jensmaurer

   changed the title [-][basic.fundamental] No mention of cv std::nullptr_t in basic.fundamental[/-] [+]CWG2689 [basic.fundamental] No mention of cv std::nullptr_t in basic.fundamental[/+] on Jan 17, 2023
2. jensmaurer commented on Jan 17, 2023

   

   jensmaurer

   on Jan 17, 2023

   Member

   More actions

   CWG2689
3. languagelawyer commented on Aug 21, 2023

   

   languagelawyer

   on Aug 21, 2023

   Last edited by languagelawyer

   More actions

   Isn't

   The types denoted by std::nullptr_t, const std::nullptr_t, volatile std::nullptr_t, and const volatile std::nullptr_t are distinct types.

   an extremely long and boring way to say

   the type of nullptr is a non-class, non-array object type

   ?
4. languagelawyer commented on Aug 21, 2023

   

   languagelawyer

   on Aug 21, 2023

   More actions

   How about

   [lex.nullptr]/1

   The pointer literal is the keyword nullptr. It has a distinct fundamental type ([basic.fundamental]) std​::​nullptr_t.

   [basic.fundamental]/16

   The type of nullptr prvalue (and any its cv-qualified version) is a non-class, non-array object type, distinct from other types in this subclause. A value of type std​::​nullptr_t is a null pointer constant ([conv.ptr])…
5. tkoeppe

   closed this as completedin draft#6906on Apr 15, 2024