Repository navigation
CWG2689 [basic.fundamental] No mention of cv std::nullptr_t in basic.fundamental #223
Description
Activity
- changed the title
[-][basic.fundamental] No mention of cv std::nullptr_t in basic.fundamental[/-][+]CWG2689 [basic.fundamental] No mention of cv std::nullptr_t in basic.fundamental[/+]on Jan 17, 2023 Isn't
The types denoted by std::nullptr_t, const std::nullptr_t, volatile std::nullptr_t, and const volatile std::nullptr_t are distinct types.
an extremely long and boring way to say
the type of
nullptris a non-class, non-array object type?
How about
[lex.nullptr]/1
The pointer literal is the keyword
nullptr. It has a distinct fundamental type ([basic.fundamental])std::nullptr_t[basic.fundamental]/16
The type of
nullptrprvalue (and any its cv-qualified version) is a non-class, non-array object type, distinct from other types in this subclause. A value of type std::nullptr_t is a null pointer constant ([conv.ptr])…
Full name of submitter (unless configured in github; will be published with the issue): Anoop Rana
Reference (section label): [basic.fundamental]
Link to reflector thread (if any): #193 (comment)
Issue description: There is no mention of cv qualified
std::nullptr_tin basic.fundamental.Suggested resolution:
Add wording for cv qualified version of
std::nullptr_tin [basic.fundamental].