Add PyABIInfo_Check to the c-api - #8941
Conversation
|
Codex usage limits have been reached for code reviews. Please check with the admins of this repo to increase the limits by adding credits. |
|
Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius. 🧰 Additional context used📚 Code guidelines (1)No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository: RustPython/RustPython/.coderabbit.yml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 10 included reviews per hour; 9 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe change moves ChangesPyABIInfo validation
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to No actionable compatibility issue was established; the change is ready for normal merge checks. Security Architecture ReviewSecurity architecture risk: 🔵 Low · up to The new check reads native caller-provided metadata and follows existing interpreter error handling, without a demonstrated increase in authority. Its external compatibility requirements and caller obligations are not fully verified, so the remaining risk is low rather than minimal. Retained concerns Security review detailsSecurity Blast Radius
Trust Boundaries and Controls
Resilience and Maintainability Implications
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
6e8d94e to
1389d89
Compare
Summary by CodeRabbit