Skip to content

Codex/ai storyboard director 5.6.0 preview - #17

Open
62656456 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/ai-storyboard-director-5.6.0-preview
Open

62656456 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
codex/ai-storyboard-director-5.6.0-preview

Conversation

@62656456

@62656456 62656456 commented Sep 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Outcome

Describe the user-visible result this change produces.

Scope

  • Skill(s) changed:
  • Shared references changed:
  • Explicitly not changed:

Evidence

  • python scripts/validate_repository.py passes
  • The triggering request is documented
  • The produced artifact was inspected
  • Status claims distinguish structural validation from practice validation
  • No private path, credential, company work, or unlicensed third-party material is included

Risk and rollback

Describe compatibility risks and the smallest safe rollback.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 5, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-05T16:16:28.759734Z 8d4fe2e PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 8d4fe2efc0

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".


jobs:
package:
if: github.event_name != 'release' || !startsWith(github.event.release.tag_name, 'ai-storyboard-director-v5.6.0-rc.')

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Build and upload preview assets before skipping packaging

For releases tagged ai-storyboard-director-v5.6.0-rc.*, this condition disables the repository's only release-triggered upload job. The new storyboard-preview.yml workflow has no release trigger and only runs tests and validation, and a repository-wide search finds no other builder for the promised preview ZIP or SHA256SUMS.txt; therefore publishing the documented prerelease leaves users without its downloadable package unless an undocumented manual build/upload happens.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Comment on lines +123 to +124
if path.is_symlink():
errors.append({"code": "RUNTIME_SYMLINK_FORBIDDEN", "path": relative})

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Check the unresolved runtime path for symlinks

When a manifest runtime file is a symlink, this check cannot detect it because path was already passed through .resolve() on line 114. Replacing the bundle's SKILL.md with an in-tree symlink still makes this validator return ready: true, so the explicit RUNTIME_SYMLINK_FORBIDDEN policy is bypassed and a manifest can omit the symlink's real dependency; retain the unresolved candidate for is_symlink() and resolve a separate path for containment and hashing.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Comment on lines +445 to +447
verify_source(root, proposed)
proposed["revision"] = old["revision"] + 1
sha256 = save_state(root, proposed)

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Reject the internal state file as an amended source

During an explicit amendment, a proposal can set source.path to .director_design/state.json with the current state's hash and line count, and this verification succeeds. The subsequent save overwrites that same file with the amended state, so the command reports success but every following context, ordinary commit, or export immediately fails with SOURCE_DRIFT; reject the state file, or the reserved .director_design tree, as a script source before committing.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Comment on lines +467 to +472
reviews = validate_state(state)
if args.allow_unverified_geometry:
text_field(args.review_note, "--review-note")
else:
require(not args.review_note, "REVIEW_FLAG_REQUIRED", "--review-note requires --allow-unverified-geometry")
require(not reviews, "NEEDS_GEOMETRY_REVIEW", "Design retained; review geometry or explicitly export an unverified candidate")

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Scope geometry review gating to the requested scene

When any unrelated scene has axis.status: needs_geometry_review, validate_state(state) adds it to this global reviews list, so exporting a fully checked scene named by --scene is rejected as NEEDS_GEOMETRY_REVIEW; using the override instead incorrectly labels that checked scene's receipt as an unverified candidate. This makes one unfinished scene block delivery of every completed scene in a long project, so retain whole-state structural validation but apply the geometry-review export gate to the selected scene.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant