User talk:N2e/Archive 12

Archive 5

←

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

Archive 13

CS1 error on Tupolev Tu-22M

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Tupolev Tu-22M, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:09, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Yeah, that is a false positive. I added a full source citation in the edit I made. N2e (talk) 02:53, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Bolivarian Navy of Venezuela

Your recent edits to the table of ships at Bolivarian Navy of Venezuela have left some damage. I'm not sure whether to make some bold cuts or just revert your changes - could you take a look and clean up the broken section of table? pauli133 (talk) 17:05, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the note, pauli133. I see that I had inadvertently deleted a bit of the table formatting syntax. I've fixed that table now. N2e (talk) 17:56, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

WP:ONUS

The WP:ONUS is on those to gain the consensus for the inclusion of disputed content. Other editors have objected to the content at the talkpage, ergo there is no consensus for inclusion. Please revert. Thanks. Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:59, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Don't just ignore me. WP:ONUS is policy, WP:BRD is not. Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:11, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Is the Tesla, Inc. lead now sufficiently short?

Hi N2e. On December 20, you added the "Lead too long" template to the Tesla, Inc. article, and said: "Some details, e.g. deets of company formation, might beneficially move to the article body."

I have now shortened the lead by one paragraph to conform to the Lead "length guidelines" (which say it should be at most 4 paragraphs).

I have also removed the detail of Musk's initial $6.5 million investment, as it's not critical.

Are those changes sufficient to shorten the lead and remove the "Lead too long" template? ReferenceMan (talk) 15:42, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Yes! Thanks for improving Wikipedia, ReferenceMan! I've removed the tag. N2e (talk) 19:23, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Unreferenced articles February 2024 backlog drive

WikiProject Unreferenced articles | February 2024 Backlog Drive
There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles cited. Remember to tag your edit summary with [[WP:FEB24]], both to advertise the event and tally the points later using Edit Summary Search. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of SpaceX ambition of colonizing Mars for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SpaceX ambition of colonizing Mars is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SpaceX ambition of colonizing Mars until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 06:02, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of SpaceX Mars propellant plant

The article SpaceX Mars propellant plant has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Destination page no longer contains info regarding this and no page on Wikipedia exists for this. Best to return this to non-existence and let someone create it when it's needed.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ergzay (talk) 17:59, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

"SpaceX Mars propellant plant" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect SpaceX Mars propellant plant has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 29 § SpaceX Mars propellant plant until a consensus is reached. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 01:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on 2024 Iranian strikes against Israel

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2024 Iranian strikes against Israel, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:18, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on DARPA

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page DARPA, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

"Anabaptist Healthshare" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Anabaptist Healthshare has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 19 § Anabaptist Healthshare until a consensus is reached. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 20:16, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Category:Deep Space Network has been nominated for discussion

Category:Deep Space Network has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nurg (talk) 05:42, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Recent work

I can’t give you a barnstar using my browser, but I would if I could. I was just remarking in real life how well Wikipedia is keeping up with the August 2024 Kursk Oblast incursion, especially compared to mainstream media, and you are part of the effort. Thank you! Bearian (talk) 23:32, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Data structure (disambiguation)

The article Data structure (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:00, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

"Blue Origin landing platform" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Blue Origin landing platform has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 8 § Blue Origin landing platform until a consensus is reached. 64.229.88.34 (talk) 10:21, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, much has changed. Blue now has two vessels that they've designated for that role, and unfortunately, have named both of them two names, and the same names. I've commented on your RFD, and have spent nearly an hour cleaning up the various redirects and disambigs related to all those articles. N2e (talk) 12:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Tesla cybercab

Part of the reaons here is that so often Musk is making stuff up regarding timelines. So, this isn't like GM saying something is going into production by next year and of course it actually does. But noting that Musk is saying this, so this isn't some kind of corporate committment, but just him saying stuff.... --ZimZalaBim ^talk 04:06, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

WikiProject Unreferenced articles November 2024 backlog drive

WikiProject Unreferenced articles | November 2024 Backlog Drive
There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles cited. Remember to tag your edit summary with #NOV24, both to advertise the event and tally the points later using Hashtag Summary Search. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:06, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Tesla as a source?

Hi @N2e:

I guess you think Tesla site

https://www.tesla.com/NACS

cited on top of the table is not a valid source for

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_Supercharger

NACS adoption timeline

"...citation at the top of a table section is always out of date and fails to cover many subsequent edits..."

That's the whole point.  Tesla grants access to 5 companies currently.  We need to check with Tesla's source on top of the table against the other 5 companies to see whether there's any discrepancy. Tamnguyenrn (talk) 22:18, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

I don't know what you are talking about User:Tamnguyenrn. Can you provide the name of the article and some specific edit.

Obviously, Tesla can be a source. But the problem with that primary source, especially at the "top of the table" as you said, could be many things. Perhaps it not easily verifiable as to the date the previous editor checked it; or perhaps it is simply a better source needed situation. I'd have to know what article or edit you are talking about to be able to tell. N2e (talk) 02:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi N2e. Thank you for your work on November 2024 Amsterdam attacks. Another editor, GrabUp, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

There is already another article about this, Jewish pogrom in Amsterdam.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|GrabUp}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

GrabUp - Talk 04:03, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Man @GrabUp:, I worked really hard to find another article first, before creating that one. I did over a half dozen Wikipedia searches, and nothing came up. So figured I'd just stub out a new article, following normal policy (notability, verifiability, nothing undue or too likely to show a POV, etc.)

Welp, the content will clearly have to be merged. But I think that the title I chose is the far more neutral one. N2e (talk) 04:42, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Yes, I support your title. The article was created just 6 minutes before yours. GrabUp - Talk 04:59, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Voyager Space Holdings

Hello, N2e. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Voyager Space Holdings, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Well, that submission isn't mine. I just created the original redirect for that company back in 2019. Looks like other editors have proposed that article. I looked it over, still needs a lot of work. Made a few suggestions and changed a few things in article prose. N2e (talk) 15:43, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Samolet

Although I see where you were coming from, I've reverted your edits to Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-15. The "Aircraft" in parentheses was to clarify that "Samolet" means "aircraft", not that it was a list of "Samolet aircraft designations". As such, reverting your edits fixes this issue. - ZLEA _T\^C 21:35, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

2025 Bielefeld mass shooting moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2025 Bielefeld mass shooting. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Reconrabbit 15:52, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

There is barely any information about this event, and only two references are used. This isn't Wikinews, we can afford to wait until further details exist to publish such articles. Reconrabbit 15:54, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2025 Bielefeld mass shooting

The article 2025 Bielefeld mass shooting has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a newspaper. Nothing here suggests this is notable at least yet

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Maungapohatu (talk) 17:34, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of 2025 Bielefeld mass shooting for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2025 Bielefeld mass shooting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 Bielefeld mass shooting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

E_F⁵ 14:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello N2e! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Need an univolved editor to review a speedyDeletion, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:19, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi N2e. Thank you for your work on An Yang 2. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

A stub, but worth including given its grounding in 2025 and the political importance. After a flurry of activity in February, it's ready for a little more polish, but meets minimum criteria.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 22:40, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

@Klbrain:, thanks for that. I have added a bit more information from later sources. Looks like the ship may be scrapped in place, and the source you added shows it has been on no further voyages since the grounding. Cheers. N2e (talk) 00:25, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Data structure (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Data structure (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Data structure (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:31, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

"Data structure (blockchain)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Data structure (blockchain) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 May 18 § Data structure (blockchain) until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:13, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Voyager Space Holdings

Hello, N2e. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Voyager Space Holdings".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:27, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

This is weird. I think I created an article for this newish company one time based on a few articles I'd seen in the space press and a few of the companies in the holding were doing notable work. I don't believe I worked on it after that. (but perhaps I only created a redirect to another article; I don't recall, and cannot tell just now, 'cause of the deletion).

Now I cannot find any article in Drafts at [[Draft:Voyager Space Holdings|Voyager Space Holdings]], and there is only a redirect for Voyager Space Holdings in the article mainspace, last edited in 2024, but looks like I've never had anything to do with that redirect. I'm confused.

Either way, I read in my news feed this morning that this company has just recently filed to go public, so likely more notable stuff in the future. So the company article ought to be made able to be worked on once again. But the request "undeletion by following the instructions [[WP:REFUND/G13|'''here''']]". link you provided is not working, 'cause it says the article already exists.

I'm confused as to how to fix this. N2e (talk) 12:18, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Unreferenced articles June 2025 backlog drive

WikiProject Unreferenced articles | June 2025 Backlog Drive
There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles cited. Remember to tag your edit summary with #JUN25, both to advertise the event and tally the points later using Hashtag Summary Search. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:15, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

Operation Web

Is this the same as Operation Spider's Web? Gjs238 (talk) 21:32, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Hmm. Yes, it would appear that two parallel articles were created describing the events of the massive drone attack on the strategic bombers of multiple Russian air bases. I would expect they will be cleanly merged and one become a redirect to the other. N2e (talk) 22:50, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

• OK, well, my understanding is that you created the redundant article and was hoping that you would perform the clean merge and redirect.

Gjs238 (talk) 13:09, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Whomever proposed the merge should start a discussion section at where they left a link for the "Discuss" item. I looked. No section has been started. I would be happy to join in on it then; but it seems out of synch for me to try to unilaterally do anything with the extant article by myself, which was after all created in good faith only because no other article on the thing could be found. Moreover, multiple editors have worked on the page, so needs to be done by consensus. N2e (talk) 18:05, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Courtesy notice: undone RfD tag at Panzerschokolade

Hi N2e, I've undone your tagging of Panzerschokolade as the entry was never listed at WP:RfD. If you'd like to nominate it again, please ensure the redirect gets placed at the discussion log. You might find WP:Twinkle helpful in automating those steps.

Thanks, Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 15:31, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

I couldn't figure it out, Bobby Cohn. I just noted that there is no mention of Panzerschokolade in the article that the Panzerschokolade redirect goes to; nor is there any verifiable source that ties it to the other prescription drugs that German doctors were prescribing in WWII. If Wikipedia leaves the poor redirect in place, that is okay with me. Will leave it to someone else to note the lack of connection. Cheers. N2e (talk) 17:24, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

Looks to have been an urban legend that the chocolate contained methamphetamines, looking at this blog(?) post from The Skeptic. I've completed the nomination for you. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 17:29, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

"Standard Lithium" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Standard Lithium has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 July 26 § Standard Lithium until a consensus is reached. Johnjbarton (talk) 16:47, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Oleksandr Usyk vs. Daniel Dubois (disambiguation)

The article Oleksandr Usyk vs. Daniel Dubois (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:58, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:2025 Bielefeld shooting

Hello, N2e. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2025 Bielefeld shooting, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:08, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

A bit odd, but then mass shootings seem to be covered differently by news, and in information releases from the courts and police, in Germany compared to the US. But if there is insufficient info after the early news reports, then perhaps it is for the best. N2e (talk) 21:54, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi N2e. Thank you for your work on Lee Fire. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 01:55, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2025 Bielefeld shooting

Hello, N2e. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "2025 Bielefeld shooting".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 22:25, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

CS1 error on Rare-earth element

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Rare-earth element, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:24, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

Fixed, title has been added. Thanks. N2e (talk) 00:30, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Akkerman Inc.

The article Akkerman Inc. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability standards - Template added by another editor in 2019 and the issue has not been resolved.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:30, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Seems notable as companies go, both innovation and awards, plus multiple sources over a couple of decades. N2e (talk) 01:19, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

Unreferenced articles November 2025 backlog drive

WikiProject Unreferenced articles | November 2025 Backlog Drive
There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles cited. Remember to tag your edit summary with #NOV25, both to advertise the event and tally the points later using Hashtag Summary Search. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:28, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Jack Mallers

Hello, N2e. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jack Mallers, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:13, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

No, that is incorrect. I only created a redirect, and did it in article mainspace. Another editor, User:Hajosmit came along later and created that into an article; and then it seems to have subsequently been moved to draftspace. Cheers. N2e (talk) 03:17, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

WikiProject SpaceX

Hi. Would you be interested in joining a WikiProject SpaceX? If you are please add support on it proposal page. @N2e:

I don't know exactly when this question was added to my Talk page; but it was a long time ago. Adding this cmt to it, so it gets a date field, and the bot will one day pick it up and archive it as it should. N2e (talk) 00:31, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for SpaceX reusable launch system development program

SpaceX reusable launch system development program has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:47, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

Hey!

There is a draft on the 2025 Minnesota fraud scandal involving Tim Walz: Draft: 2025 Minnesota fraud allegations shane (talk to me if you want!) 23:20, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

also Happy New Year! shane (talk to me if you want!) 23:23, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

"Endurance (submarine)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Endurance (submarine) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 11 § Endurance (submarine) until a consensus is reached. Mdewman6 (talk) 03:44, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Are you into astrophysics?

A draft you worked on has been moved to article space, and is now titled Outline of astrophysics.

Perhaps you could take a look at it and make improvements.

Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   01:01, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Canada shoting

That's not the prerogative of the laws.. That is analysis. Psephguru (talk) 19:37, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

It was a request for information to improve the article; no statement was even made in wikiprose. N2e (talk) 19:30, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

"Interbank Information Network" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Interbank Information Network has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 12 § Interbank Information Network until a consensus is reached. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 16:50, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Yeah, can't see that that Interbank Information Network is even explicated in that article at the redirect target any longer. So fine by me if that redir disappears. Cheers. N2e (talk) 19:30, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Anyplace for serious discussion w other editors about the future of the English Wikipedia?

I ran across your thread over at the Village Pump.

You seemed to be the only one there who had any clue of the magnitude of what is coming.

Have you read this article?: Accelerating change

Accordingly, diffusion of technology is speeding up. TVs diffused faster than the telephone, PCs spread faster than TV, cellphones were adopted even quicker, with smartphones diffusing with even greater speed than that.

The diffusion of generative AI is surpassing all of those, and this pattern will continue with each successive technology.

The pipeline includes multi-modal models, reasoning engines, iterative agents, and embodied AI. The latter is the application of AI to robots, drones, vehicles, and machines in general to enable them to receive natural language instructions and learn from demonstrations.

You look out your window today, and you see zero robots. In five years, who knows?

Dario Amodei, the CEO of Anthropic, predicts that AIs will be able to do his job within the foreseeable future, but before that, perhaps 2026 or 2027, AIs will have advanced sensory perception.

They'll be able to collect their own data in the physical world.

What will Wikipedia be in the midst of all of this?

A memory.

At some point, everybody will be getting their knowledge from an AI that composes it all on the spot at one's command.

For a slight sense of what that will feel like, go to perplexity.ai and tell it to write a book. You pick the subject. It's about 10 times better than it was 2 years ago. And in 2 years it may be 20 to 100 times better than it is today.

Will people even read anymore, or will they prefer the quick videos their AIs can create to show and tell them whatever they want to know on demand?

How long will this progression take?

Faster than most people expect.

Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   13:59, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

P.S.: The above assumes friendly AI, hoping we're that lucky.

Yeah, I tried over there to see about serious discussion, but got mostly midwit comments about AIs in general or how Wikipedia is better than xyz. Seemed a poor forum to find serious ppl to discuss the future of Wikipedia generally, given the existence today of so-called AIs, and the undoubted continuation of that technology advance. So I just let it go. (It did, rather obviously in the Pump, have a miniscule audience.)

So cool you find interest in such topics. I had not read the article on Accelerating change, but did read it today; tweaked a couple of things. I've been quite aware of the thesis on accelerating accelerating change since the 1990s, and certainly accept the basic thesis. I have not really taken the time to overview the history of various thinkers/philosophers on the matter, and that article did provide a high-level intro to that. (i actually love the "history of _____ thought" topics on various matters of acquired human knowledge. i even wrote on the topic of the history of economic thought on self-organizing social behavior. ... and how various technology baselines can support whole new avenues/areas for human self-organization. ... which, as I think about it now, is very much a case where AIs, and increasingly capable AIs, will radically (again) facilitate entirely new vectors for human self organization, and outcomes to emerge.)

THanks for the note. N2e (talk) 17:30, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Here's a philosophical question for you to ponder: "With AIs today being able to produce in seconds subject-based articles and chapters starting to approach Wikipedia quality, what will they be able to do in a year, 2 years, 4 years?"

Asked another way: "Will prompting an AI replace looking things up?"

Another article you might be interested in is recursive self-improvement (RSI). It provides some insight on how computers themselves may contribute to the accelerating acceleration of technology. Even now, RSI is happening, through programmers using AI coding tools. While not autonomous, it's still autocatalytic. The pair (programmer + AI) is the thing that is recursively self-improving. So, one can argue that we are already in the midst of an intelligence explosion.

It isn't a giant leap of logic, based on the vast array of tasks that are currently being automated, or the alarming number abilities that have emerged, to expect that RSI will also be automated or emerge. Computers directing their own learning, or redesigning themselves, or both. While a single computer acquiring RSI qualifies as an intelligence explosion, the fireworks really take off once combined with mass production of components to add to a single entity, or production lines of complete computers also capable of RSI. This can theoretically be decentralized with 3D-printers, and therefore, less likely to contain.

As Wikipedia is included in the training data of virtually all AIs, it might remain part of the legacy. The community and foundation supporting it may fade away over time, but the Wikipedia data set may live on in one form or another inside the computers of the future.

Hopefully, artificial general intelligence (AGI), if or when it does emerge, achieves the better qualities of humankind from the wisdom Wikipedia and the rest of the data set we (the human race) have provided to it.

Keep your fingers crossed.

For the time being, Wikipedia is positioning to remain in the game. In that link's article, which if about the WMF monetizing WP data to help continue funding WP operations, Jimbo Wales was quoted as saying "“You can imagine a world where you can ask the Wikipedia search box a question and it will quote to you from Wikipedia.”

Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   01:41, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Speaking of self-organization...

Are you still looking for serious discussion on AI and Wikipedia's future?

I was having trouble finding a venue to talk about this stuff, so I started a discussion over at the Help Project to explore how we could and should be supporting users who try out AI on Wikipedia, with help pages.

I invited everyone I could find involved with AI on Wikipedia, and all the members of the Help Project as well. It has been interesting seeing the meshing of the attitude to protect content from AI hallucinations even if we have to ban AI, with the view that people need guidance on how to use AI apps (chatbots and the like) responsibly that they will be using anyways, into a single discussion.

It's centered around the context of choosing an AI procedure, and then writing a help page on it.

It seems to have hit a nerve.

The opening phase, which we're still on, is brainstorming every activity we can think of that an AI could potentially be used in relation to or on Wikipedia.

In the midst of this is a lot of excited discussion about the dangers of doing this wrong.

The discussion has attracted some editors with a high degree of experience using AI and developing AI tools.

If you are interested, come check it out.

Hope to see you there. Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   06:24, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

@The Transhumanist:, sure, quite interested in the discussion. Although I start out pessimistic about the probabilities of the discussion staying focused and on the rails given the current state of debate in both AI in general and English Wikipedia bias. I'll try to get over there and have a look. N2e (talk) 13:20, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

LOL. Focused? We're all over the place. That's half the fun. Lots going on there. Learning. Networking. Tip and technique sharing. Editing (see this new page: Wikipedia:Artificial intelligence resources). Consensus building... There's already general agreement on at least one direction to move forward. Idea generation. And expanding everyone's option awareness. It's a party!    — The Transhumanist   15:44, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Well, you called that one right. They did derail it. Now the question is, why didn't I see that one coming? LOL.    — The Transhumanist   01:15, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

"United States War against Iran" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect United States War against Iran has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 March 4 § United States War against Iran until a consensus is reached. A1Cafel (talk) 16:06, 4 March 2026 (UTC)