Jump to content

User talk:Morrissey4Prez2024

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Izno in topic September 2026

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Morrissey4Prez2024, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Lent. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Pbritti (talk) 19:16, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Minor edits

[edit]

Information icon Hi Morrissey4Prez2024! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. John (talk) 13:22, 16 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

March 2026

[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Planned obsolescence. When removing a maintenance template, please either ensure that the problem that the template refers to has been resolved, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as this change has been reverted. Take a look at getting started to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 21:52, 22 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

April 2026

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Chess enjoyer. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Eric Swalwell, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The Gateway Pundit is deprecated. Chess enjoyer (talk) 01:44, 13 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

May 2026

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dexys Midnight Runners, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 12:54, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

June 2026

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at DeRidder, Louisiana, you may be blocked from editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:07, 11 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

August 2026

[edit]

Stop icon You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Lake Ontario. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 18:39, 27 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Information icon Hello, I'm Oblivy. I noticed that you changed content about a living or recently deceased person on Natalie Harp, but you didn't support your changes with a reliable source. Wikipedia has strict policies on how we write about living people to keep such articles accurate and clear, so your change has been removed and archived in the page history for now. If you think I made a mistake or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my talk page. Thank you! Oblivy (talk) 04:21, 29 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

Information icon You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Tbhotch™ (CC BY-SA 4.0) 04:57, 28 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

September 2026

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Gracie Folds, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 00:55, 5 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Information icon Hello, I'm Stormsnsnow. I noticed that you changed content about a living or recently deceased person on Michael Polansky, but you didn't support your changes with a reliable source. Wikipedia has strict policies on how we write about living people to keep such articles accurate and clear, so your change has been removed and archived in the page history for now. If you think I made a mistake or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my talk page. I added the citation for you. Bryce M (talk) 12:09, 12 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Lady Gaga, you may be blocked from editing. RachelTensions (talk) 04:49, 13 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Information icon You have recently made edits related to living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles. This is a standard message to inform you that living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Tbhotch™ (CC BY-SA 4.0) 05:22, 13 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

This is the second time you recieve a warning related to violating contentious topics procedures. If you continue avoiding reading and understanding these procedures, this will be escalated to the arbitrary commitee. Tbhotch™ (CC BY-SA 4.0) 05:22, 13 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. RachelTensions (talk) 22:22, 18 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Izno (talk) 21:49, 20 September 2026 (UTC)Reply