This talk page is automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. Any threads with no replies in 75days may be automatically moved. Sections without timestamps are not archived.
This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.
Latest comment: 13 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Have a Happy Adminship Anniversary!
Hey there Hey man im josh, I'd like to wish you a happy adminship anniversary! Congratulations on your special day, and thank you for all the contributions you've made.
Latest comment: 10 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The administrator elections process has officially started! Qualified editors are encouraged to find at least one experienced nominator. Self-nominations are also allowed. Please review instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2026/Candidates.
Here is the schedule:
September 29–October 5: Nominations phase (we are here)
October 8–12: Discussion phase
October 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase
Please note the following:
The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed. However, in practice, few candidates succeed without ~10K edits, some content creation, no recent behavioral issues, and a nominator.
The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.
The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.
Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. Later, a user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.
If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
You will not be notified in the future about new articles linked to any of the articles you have created, if you wish to opt-in to receiving these notifications, please follow the opt-in instructions.
@Primefac I noticed you were involved in the bot task for this... Are there other bots that are allowed to mass message, seemingly advertising themselves, like this one? I guess what I'm wondering is why this bot is allowed to send so many message that users have not yet opted into. From my perspective, bots like these should be opt-in only, especially considering it's not notifying the person who converted the page from a redirect ton article. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:01, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
This is not a mass-message bot (messages go to individual editors for specific reasons). Technically the bot is opt-in, but the (what I felt was fairly reasonable) argument for messaging users without their explicit opting-in was that users wouldn't know the bot existed unless they got a "first one's free" notice. As far as implementation goes (such as the redirect issue) the botop is the one to contact. That being said, this is a rather huge number of edits to make so it might be worth changing it to only users who have opted-in (especially since we're at almost 4k notifications and any folk who are interested will probably have seen it posted somewhere). I'll give it a think, but if you want more opinions I would suggest raising the matter at BOTN for more BAG input. Primefac (talk) 20:43, 29 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment
Following an RfC, late signatures added to administrator recall petitions after 720 hours from opening are reverted or struck and do not count towards the threshold, even if the petition has not yet been formally closed.
The post-May 2026 administrator elections RfCs concluded with consensus for election monitors to curate blatantly inappropriate questions after posting, and to remove or merge true duplicates, clearly marking merged questions. Calls for candidates will include advisory guidance that users with less than one year’s experience or 5,000 edits generally lack a realistic chance of success.
Technical news
Interface administrators no longer need to specify the ResourceLoader option in the definitions for gadgets on MediaWiki:Gadgets-definition as gadgets are always loaded through ResourceLoader. (T298199)
The list=abusefilters API module now supports formatversion=2 and includes breaking changes to its responses. In particular, the actions property is now a JSON array rather than a string, regardless of the format version. Maintainers of user scripts and other code using this module should check compatibility and update their code as needed. (T435828)
Doug Weller passed away on 30 September 2026. Doug Weller began editing Wikipedia in 2006 and became an administrator in 2008, making nearly 275,000 edits over two decades. He served on the Arbitration Committee from 2015 through 2018 and was also a longtime CheckUser and Oversighter.
On 13 Oct, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for.
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.