User talk:ElKevbo
Add topicLatest comment: 1 day ago by ElKevbo in topic Syracuse University
John Jay Article
[edit]Hey, I don't know how to leave a signature so sorry about that but saw your edit. Those were college majors (have provided a link to the correct source), I don't know if it's against WP policy to list the majors the college offers (if it does, please feel free to let me know or undo it and I apologize) but wanted to give you the heads up. Anyway, it is dedicated to Criminal Justice, hence the college's name (John Jay College of Criminal Justice). Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.41.108.33 (talk • contribs) 22:16, November 4, 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 August 2026
[edit]- News and notes: Union process progresses, unanswered questions about Littler Mendelson remain
And Raju Narisetti leaves WMF board after nine years.
- In the media: Wikipedia editors save Sam Altman's life
Can AI do that? Meanwhile, Ruwiki gives porn the shaft, and has Grokipedia ghosted?
- Recent research: Women in blue? Wikipedia's gender gap reverses in some areas
And other new research findings.
- Discussion report: Again and Again
The community comes to consensus.
- Traffic report: Look out, here comes the Spider-Man!
Plus The Odyssey and varied topics caught in his web.
- Humour: Her tastes, her Wikimania, her upcoming tour... Baby Globe reveals everything
A short (parody) interview with Baby Globe via the French wikipress outlet, Regards sur l’Actualité du mouvement Wikimédia (RAW).
- On the bright side: The great outdoors
Blue Angels, Indigenous Peoples' Day, and the Perseids meteor shower.
- Opinion: Are we embarrassed yet?
One editor wants to find out more about a Department of Justice investigation of Wikipedia and its editors.
- Special report: Paris Syndrome: Labor Strife, AI Anxiety, and a Leadership Test at Wikimania 2026
Notes from a delightful Wikimania and the ugly week that followed.
- Comix: WP:FAOWN
"Explaining civilly" probably should go both ways...
The Signpost: 16 September 2026
[edit]- News and notes: The Balance of Power
Wikimedia employees unionize, officer departs, The Signpost gains sister on Wiktionary
- In the media: Shocking photos may be changed on Wikipedia
The image gallery anyone can edit.
- Disinformation report: Have UN Secretary-General candidates manipulated Wikipedia?
Speaking diplomatically, not all of them.
- Recent research: Google's AI overviews may have reduced search engine referrals to English Wikipedia by 5%
And other research findings.
- WikiConference report: The backwater symbiosis – reflections from Wiki Conference India 2026
The fourth iteration of Wiki Conference India.
- Traffic report: Heaven let your light shine down
The recently deceased dominate while still leaving room for some entertainment.
- Serendipity: Wikipedia Family Mosh Pit
A poem by Mollystarkdean.
- Obituary: Passing of Gobonobo, community leader advocating for women and minorities
Promoter of cultural knowledge and organizer of global cooperation.
- On the bright side: Fantasy video games, hopeful science fiction, and the change of seasons
The Legend of Zelda, Star Trek, and Vivaldi's The Four Seasons.
- Comix: The Adventure of the Unknown Corpse
An elementary case for fiction's greatest detective.
Cornell 7
[edit]Seems like you’re of the prestige to do so, can you advise on or even find the appropriate sources to list for the Cornell 7 rape case instead of just deleting and saying they’re not right?
It’s a high profile case right now and should be part of the wiki.
Best ESmithW (talk) 18:15, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
- We generally prefer reputable news organizations and peer-reviewed scholarship, especially when we're writing about sensitive or controversial issues such as allegations of criminal behavior. That includes reputable national media outlets, local outlets, and higher education-specific outlets (e.g., The Chronicle of Higher Education, Inside Higher Ed). Blog posts and websites with unknown reputations generally aren't considered to be reliable sources for that kind of information. ElKevbo (talk) 21:24, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
- I agree. I get wanting to get rid unreliable sources but I’m all for the truth and it seems this whole situation really happened so if you keeping deleting it even with actual reliable sources, yikes, man. It not only won’t be a good look, but it may seem to look like someone is intending to erase any information about it.
- One of the sources (that you deleted, Kevbo) is CBS News and they still seems to be a genuine reliable source.
- https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/video/former-cornell-student-sues-school-frat-members-over-rape-allegations/ RayKVega (talk) 00:44, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks - I overlooked that source in the text. My apologies!
- I'm still not sure that these allegations belong in the article. I think we need to know more than what is primarily being shared by the plaintiff and her lawyer. If this is as bad as it sounds, there will be more substantive information and then we'll be in a much better position to figure out how and if this should be included in the article.
- You're also welcome to open a discussion in the article's Talk page to see what other editors think and to collaborate to draft material for the article! ElKevbo (talk) 00:52, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
Would you have a moment to look at the recent edits at Syracuse University. They seem awkwardly promotional, or AI-generated. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:16, 8 October 2026 (UTC)
- They look okay to me. But I'm not good at detecting AI writing so that may not mean much! ElKevbo (talk) 22:34, 8 October 2026 (UTC)