Template:Did you know nominations/Notre-Dame de Paris: Version anglaise

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. Track your hook after promotion. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Beta Beta Beta (talk) 17:30, 15 October 2026 (UTC)

Notre-Dame de Paris: Version anglaise

(

)

... that William Ruhlmann of AllMusic thought that the English-language version of an "enormous French hit" seemed "to drag along for most of its length"?

Source:

- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Bunka Apartments
- Comment: A better hook is needed.

Created by Moscow Connection (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 45 past nominations.

Moscow Connection (talk) 23:55, 17 August 2026 (UTC).

I will review this. KimYubin (talk) 10:55, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

@KimYubin: Reminder ping. Z1720 (talk) 03:06, 1 September 2026 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing:
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing: - n

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Moscow Connection: Earwig gives 56% & there is too much direct quotation of the AllMusic source. I suggest paraphrasing it & finding other reviews of the album. KimYubin (talk) 03:00, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Give me a couple of days. --Moscow Connection (talk)
Please wait till the end of the week. I have trouble editing. (Ever since I returned to Wikipedia in mid-September.) --Moscow Connection (talk) 22:23, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
Done I've reduced the article's "Earwig level" to "Violation unlikely". --Moscow Connection (talk) 05:25, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

It has been two weeks since the "till the end of the week" comment and the nominator has not edited since September 24. Marking for closure as being past its self-imposed deadline. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 14:06, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
- I'm back. Just a sec. (I need a few hours, to be exact.) --Moscow Connection (talk) 19:39, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
@KimYubin: I've reduced the article's "Earwig level" to "Violation unlikely". I am not sure what the numbers mean, but it looks like everything below 40 % is "Violation unlikely". --Moscow Connection (talk) 05:30, 7 October 2026 (UTC)

The article looks better. KimYubin (talk) 10:00, 7 October 2026 (UTC)