Jump to content

Talk:Genuine Parts Company

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 months ago by Spintendo in topic Company timeline

S. P. Richards

[edit]

The office supply portion of the company is named after Samuel P. Richards, a merchant during the Civil War in Atlanta and the company dates from around that time.--Jrm2007 (talk) 15:34, 4 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

S.P. Richards

[edit]

Didn’t GPC spin off SPR as an independent entity 07/01/2020? 2601:CA:C200:4D40:0:0:0:2D88 (talk) 10:34, 25 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Motion Industries -> Motion

[edit]

I believe Motion Industries is now called Motion; not comfortable editing something that is a hyperlink. And then what do you do with (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_Industries), again, not comfortable with this. Mtanquary (talk) _Motion" class="ext-discussiontools-init-timestamplink" title="2 years ago">18:52, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

History 2024

[edit]

There is a Company timeline section and a history section. The history section only has a very broad history background. I'd like to add detailed history for 2024 and work backwards to 2023->2000s. Any suggestions.

Also would something like this be appropriate?

In 2024, GPC expanded its market presence by acquiring Motor Parts & Equipment Corporation (MPEC), the largest independent owner of NAPA stores in the United States. The acquisition added 181 locations across Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. However, the transition was not without controversy. In Charlotte, Michigan, employees at a local NAPA Auto Parts store reported being unexpectedly terminated following the acquisition, leading to concerns about the handling of the workforce during the consolidation process. This development underscores the challenges that can accompany major corporate acquisitions, particularly in managing employee relations and maintaining community trust.

Prts-fan (talk) 18:16, 10 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Only if you can cite reliable source(s) for every part of that paragraph, including independent coverage of the Charlotte, MI store employees being terminated, the concerns their termination caused (and who was concerned), and what it underscores. Without one or more sources, that paragraph sounds like prohibited original research to me. General Ization Talk 18:34, 10 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
I was thinking of this citation: https://www.fox47news.com/neighborhoods/charlotte-eaton-rapids/napa-auto-parts-store-employees-in-charlotte-say-they-were-blindsided-and-fired and a reference to their own pr for timeline of when it happened. https://www.genpt.com/2024-05-01-Genuine-Parts-Company-Announces-Acquisition-of-Largest-NAPA-Independent-Store-Owner-in-the-U-S Prts-fan (talk) 17:06, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
If you look it cites Former employee Curtis Smith. Are you suggesting the paragraph has his name in the paragraph? Prts-fan (talk) 17:08, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

COI disclosure and request

[edit]

Hello! My name is Angie and I'm an employee of Genuine Parts Company. I'm creating an account here to make some suggestions for a few pages related to the company, including this article and NAPA Auto Parts.

I'll do my best to follow Wikipedia's rules for conflict of interest editing. This means I'll be asking editors to review my suggestions rather than making the changes myself. I look forward to working with editors!

A lot of the text in the current article is based on old versions of the company website. I understand this is not ideal on Wikipedia, so I plan to share some draft text based on news sources as a replacement. Instead of going through the article by paragraph, I wonder if editors would be willing to remove some of the paragraphs based on bad sources? I'll add a request below with some specific ideas.

Thanks! AG GPC (talk) 17:17, 26 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

I would like to suggest removing these sections:

1. Genuine_Parts_Company#Automotive_parts

2. Genuine_Parts_Company#Industrial_parts

3. Genuine_Parts_Company#Electrical/electronic_materials

Also, I suggest removing these parts of the History section:

1. "For the next 50+ years, GPC, in relationship with NAPA, the National Automotive Parts Association, grew rapidly as independent garages for car repair emerged to meet the needs of the nation's growing number of motor vehicles. In the last 35+ years, GPC has continued to grow through the acquisition of other companies in the automotive industry, as well as in the industrial, office and electrical industries.[citation needed]"

2. "Today GPC is a parts distributor with over 3,100 operations and approximately 48,000 employees.[1]"

References

  1. ↑ "Genuine Parts Company".

This will make the article shorter but hopefully easier to update when I suggest some text suggestions and other updates based on better sourcing. Thanks for your help, editors! AG GPC (talk) 17:17, 26 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Not done for now: Hi. I haven't reviewed the subsections listed, but I don't think I was provided a rationale. As for the 2 paragraphs quoted, I did delete them, with an explanation provided in the edit summary. PK650 (talk) 04:57, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Inappropriately sourced text

[edit]

User:PK650: Thanks for removing this text based on my request above. I'll flag some additional content that is based on old versions of the company website. I propose removing the following four paragraphs:

Thanks again for your help, editors! AG GPC (talk) 19:43, 18 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

I've removed the text above, albeit with some misgivings because no rationale was provided when removal was previously requested (in the thread directly above) and no rationale was again provided in this request.
However, it did seem to me that the material was essentially promotional (e.g. numbers of customers, long lists of products, etc.) and was sourced only to the company's own website, so removal is hopefully non-controversial. Axad12 (talk) 13:17, 22 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

History improvements

[edit]

Hello again! I would like to offer some improved text for the History section. The section says:

This summary is based on reliable news sources. Can editors please review this proposed content and update the article appropriately on my behalf? Thank you! AG GPC (talk) 16:28, 19 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done Likeanechointheforest (talk) 21:54, 21 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Subsidiaries improvements

[edit]

Thanks to Users Axad12 and Likeanechointheforest for help with the above requests.

Similar to above, I'd like to offer some improved text for the Genuine_Parts_Company#Subsidiaries section. In its current form, this section is entirely based on GPC's website and an annual report (not secondary coverage). I propose replacing this text with the following overview of the company's current and former subsidiaries, based on reliable news sources:

You'll notice the replacement text generally covers the same topics: NAPA, Motion, and S.P. Richards. I've attempted to explain the relationships between these businesses without going into too much detail since there are separate pages for Motion and NAPA. Can editors review this proposed content and update the article appropriately on my behalf? Thank you! AG GPC (talk) 16:55, 7 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Likeanechointheforest: Are you available to review this request since you helped with the History proposal above? Thanks! AG GPC (talk) 03:27, 15 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hi there! I won't be able to for a while, but I can look when I can! Likeanechointheforest (talk) 23:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
@AG GPC Done! Likeanechointheforest (talk) 15:22, 26 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Likeanechointheforest: Thank you! I appreciate your assistance. I have requested updates to the Infobox and Introduction below, if you're available to take a look at some point. I have also posted some edit requests at Talk:NAPA Auto Parts that are related to GPC if you are interested. Thanks again for your help here! AG GPC (talk) 17:33, 29 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
Done - Closing as completed - if this is a mistake please revert this edit. Thanks, Encoded  Talk 💬 17:13, 20 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and Introduction

[edit]

Hello again! I would like to suggest an updated Infobox and Introduction:

This Infobox provides the correct founding date (1928), has updated "Key people" and "Number of employees" fields, and includes Motion as a subsidiary in addition to NAPA. The updated Introduction focuses on the company as a whole and where it operates, as opposed to the current one which focuses on product distribution. It also includes the founders and establishments date, and adds mention of Motion as another subsidiary.

As a final request, I recommend deleting the "Company timeline" section because much of the text is unsourced and the subsidiaries are covered in the request above. My user page User:AG GPC/Genuine Parts Company shows draft text for this and my previous requests. I hope this is helpful.

@Stracci~909: I am making you aware of these requests since you may also be reviewing related suggestions at Talk:NAPA Auto Parts. I am trying to improve both articles and clarify the relationship between GPC and NAPA. Thank you for reviewing! AG GPC (talk) 19:04, 24 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Done Likeanechointheforest (talk) 13:21, 31 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

WinParts (NL)

[edit]

I placed an order with Dutch company WinParts (www.winparts.eu) and, in an automated replay mail, saw a phrase <quote>This email and any attachments, contain Genuine Parts Company confidential information [...] </quote> so apparently there is a link? Could someone elaborate? Jan olieslagers (talk) 21:11, 29 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Company overview

[edit]

Hi, editors! My name is Jerry and I work for Genuine Parts Company. I would like to continue the work started by User:AG GPC above and at Talk:NAPA Auto Parts.

For this article, I would like to start by suggesting the removal of the "Company overview" section. In the History improvements request above, AG GPC proposed replacing some incorrect content. The proposed "Company History" section was accepted and added by User:Likeanechointheforest (thank you!), but the "Company overview" section remains. Here are the issues with the current "Company overview" section:

  • The founding date 1925 is not accurate. The citation (the company website) says 1928. (The added "Company History" section is correct.)
  • The company's website is used as a source for the first sentence and an annual report is used for the second source.
  • The headquarters location is already mentioned in "Company History" and S. P. Richards is already covered in the approved "Subsidiaries" sections.

Essentially, most of this section is not necessary and any helpful facts could be moved to the approved "Company History" section. User:Likeanechointheforest and other editors, are you ok with removing the "overview"? Thank you for reviewing this request. JerryGPC (talk) 19:36, 16 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Done You're right, not a whole lot worth keeping there. Section removed with one sentence moved to the company history section. Cheers, DiscoursesonLivvy (talk · contribs) 20:01, 16 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Company timeline

[edit]

User:DiscoursesonLivvy: Thank you for reviewing the above request, and for updating the article.

I'd like to submit another similar request. I suggest removal of the "Company timeline" section, which is mostly unsourced except for the few entries pointing readers to official websites. I don't think there are any entries here worth keeping because they are already covered in "Company history" or "Subsidiaries", or are not particularly significant milestones. This section seems unnecessary to me, but what do User:DiscoursesonLivvy and others think? Thank you for reviewing. JerryGPC (talk) 15:12, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Infobox

[edit]


In the infobox, can someone make the following corrections:

These changes would make the infobox match the article text. These changes were also suggested in a request above reviewed by User:Likeanechointheforest, but some of the fields are still incorrect.

Thank you. JerryGPC (talk) 15:12, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Reply 11-JUN-2026

[edit]

✅  Edit requests approved    Spintendo  03:52, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply