Talk:Diachrony and synchrony
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by T3h 1337 b0y in topic This article is pretty dire
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Diachrony and synchrony article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was selected as the article for improvement on 3 April 2017 for a period of one week. |
Saussure
[edit]Shouldn't we mention Swiss linguist Ferdinand de Saussure in this article? He was the one who brought up the distinction between a synchronic and a diachronic analysis of language. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.230.47.64 (talk) 21:23, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, and perhaps Adorno with respect to musically analogous materials together with Chomsky.Ernstblumberg (talk) 16:30, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
This article is pretty dire
[edit]It has so many inbound links, yet even C class is quite generous for this article. At minimum, it should be reorganized and expanded significantly. T3h 1337 b0y 00:41, 25 September 2025 (UTC)