Jump to content

Informal fallacy: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

25 March 2026

9 November 2025

7 November 2025

8 October 2025

1 August 2025

3 July 2025

26 May 2025

17 May 2025

17 March 2025

11 February 2025

2 November 2024

10 October 2024

6 October 2024

21 August 2024

19 August 2024

22 January 2024

6 January 2024

21 November 2023

18 November 2023

16 November 2023

28 October 2023

3 September 2023

14 July 2023

28 June 2023

25 June 2023

19 June 2023

17 June 2023

13 February 2023

11 February 2023

30 January 2023

6 January 2023

25 December 2022

19 November 2022

1 September 2022

3 August 2022

10 June 2022

  • curprev 01:2001:20, 10 June 2022 73.170.6.73 talk 39,904 bytes +3 Changed the use of “her” and “herself” in the explanation of the use of the “tu quoque” discussion technique to “them” and “themself” in keeping with the generalized language of both that particular section and the article as a whole undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

6 May 2022

21 April 2022

16 April 2022

15 April 2022

14 March 2022

10 March 2022

23 February 2022

17 February 2022

  • curprev 07:4807:48, 17 February 2022 85.193.252.19 talk 39,384 bytes +87 @User:Phlsph7: You seem to confuse color saturation with its brightness. "Pale color" means low color saturation, which (in colloquial language) implicates that something is ALSO relatively bright but not necessarily VERY bright. Try Google: "pale red". The results should make you think. I agree that "bright" is better as a contrast to "dark" but let's not twist the facts to fit the theory, if you like philosophy :-) undo
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)