Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Entanglement devised barren plateau mitigation

Taylor L. Patti1,*, Khadijeh Najafi2, Xun Gao1, and Susanne F. Yelin1

  • 1Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
  • 2Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA; IBM Quantum, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598 USA; and Division of Physics, Mathematics and Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA

  • *taylorpatti@g.harvard.edu

Phys. Rev. Research 3, 033090 – Published 23 July, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.033090

Abstract

Hybrid quantum-classical variational algorithms are one of the most propitious implementations of quantum computing on near-term devices, offering classical machine-learning support to quantum scale solution spaces. However, numerous studies have demonstrated that the rate at which this space grows in qubit number could preclude learning in deep quantum circuits, a phenomenon known as barren plateaus. In this work, we implicate random entanglement, i.e., entanglement that is formed due to state evolution with random unitaries, as a source of barren plateaus and characterize them in terms of many-body entanglement dynamics, detailing their formation as a function of system size, circuit depth, and circuit connectivity. Using this comprehension of entanglement, we propose and demonstrate a number of barren plateau ameliorating techniques, including initial partitioning of cost function and non-cost function registers, meta-learning of low-entanglement circuit initializations, selective inter-register interaction, entanglement regularization, the addition of Langevin noise, and rotation into preferred cost function eigenbases. We find that entanglement limiting, both automatic and engineered, is a hallmark of high-accuracy training and emphasize that, because learning is an iterative organization process whereas barren plateaus are a consequence of randomization, they are not necessarily unavoidable or inescapable. Our work forms both a theoretical characterization and a practical toolbox; first defining barren plateaus in terms of random entanglement and then employing this expertise to strategically combat them.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (48)

  1. J. Preskill, Quantum 2, 79 (2018).
  2. J. R. McClean, J. Romero, R. Babbush, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, New J. Phys. 18, 023023 (2016).
  3. E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, and S. Gutmann, arXiv:1411.4028.
  4. A. Peruzzo, J. McClean, P. Shadbolt, M.-H. Yung, X.-Q. Zhou, P. J. Love, A. Aspuru-Guzik, and J. L. O'Brien, Nat. Commun. 5, 4213 (2014).
  5. M.-H. Yung, J. Casanova, A. Mezzacapo, J. McClean, L. Lamata, A. Aspuru-Guzik, and E. Solano, Sci. Rep. 4, 3589 (2014).
  6. D. Wecker, M. B. Hastings, and M. Troyer, Phys. Rev. A 92, 042303 (2015).
  7. A. Kandala, A. Mezzacapo, K. Temme, M. Takita, M. Brink, J. M. Chow, and J. M. Gambetta, Nature 549, 242 (2017).
  8. E. Farhi and H. Neven, arXiv:1802.06002.
  9. J. R. McClean, S. Boixo, V. N. Smelyanskiy, R. Babbush, and H. Neven, Nat. Commun. 9, 4812 (2018).
  10. M. Cerezo, A. Sone, T. Volkoff, L. Cincio, and P. J. Coles, Nat. Commun. 12, 1791 (2021).
  11. A. Uvarov and J. Biamonte, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 54, 245301 (2021).
  12. A. Arrasmith, M. Cerezo, P. Czarnik, L. Cincio, and P. J. Coles, arXiv:2011.12245.
  13. A. Anand, M. Degroote, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, Sci. Technol. 2 045012 (2021)
  14. K. Sharma, M. Cerezo, L. Cincio, and P. J. Coles, arXiv:2005.12458.
  15. R. Wiersema, C. Zhou, Y. de Sereville, J. F. Carrasquilla, Y. B. Kim, and H. Yuen, PRX Quantum 1, 020319 (2020).
  16. A. Skolik, J. R. McClean, M. Mohseni, P. van der Smagt, and M. Leib, arXiv:2006.14904.
  17. E. Fontana, M. Cerezo, A. Arrasmith, I. Rungger, and P. J. Coles, arXiv:2011.08763.
  18. T. Volkoff and P. J. Coles, Quantum Sci. Technol. 6, 025008 (2021).
  19. E. Grant, L. Wossnig, M. Ostaszewski, and M. Benedetti, Quantum 3, 214 (2019).
  20. A. Pesah, M. Cerezo, S. Wang, T. Volkoff, A. T. Sornborger, and P. J. Coles, arXiv:2011.02966.
  21. M. J. Bremner, C. Mora, and A. Winter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 190502 (2009).
  22. D. Gross, S. T. Flammia, and J. Eisert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 190501 (2009).
  23. Z. Holmes, A. Arrasmith, B. Yan, P. J. Coles, A. Albrecht, and A. T. Sornborger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 190501 (2021).
  24. C. O. Marrero, M. Kieferová, and N. Wiebe, arXiv:2010.15968.
  25. S. Wang, E. Fontana, M. Cerezo, K. Sharma, A. Sone, L. Cincio, and P. J. Coles, arXiv:2007.14384.
  26. V. Verteletskyi, T.-C. Yen, and A. F. Izmaylov, J. Chem. Phys. 152, 124114 (2020).
  27. P. Gokhale, O. Angiuli, Y. Ding, K. Gui, T. Tomesh, M. Suchara, M. Martonosi, and F. T. Chong, arXiv:1907.13623.
  28. A. F. Izmaylov, T.-C. Yen, R. A. Lang, and V. Verteletskyi, arXiv:1907.09040.
  29. G. Verdon, M. Broughton, J. R. McClean, K. J. Sung, R. Babbush, Z. Jiang, H. Neven, and M. Mohseni, arXiv:1907.05415.
  30. M. Welling and Y. W. Teh, Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning (2011).
  31. H. Shen, P. Zhang, Y.-Z. You, and H. Zhai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 200504 (2020).
  32. P. Dita, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36, 2781 (2003).
  33. Z. Puchala and J. Miszczak, Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci.: Tech. Sci. 65, 21 (2017).
  34. A. W. Harrow and R. A. Low, Commun. Math. Phys. 291, 257 (2009).
  35. M. Walters, Ph.D. thesis, University of Rochester, 2015 (unpublished).
  36. J. M. Renes, R. Blume-Kohout, A. J. Scott, and C. M. Caves, J. Math. Phys. 45, 2171 (2004).
  37. C. Dankert, R. Cleve, J. Emerson, and E. Livine, Phys. Rev. A 80, 012304 (2009).
  38. M. Žndarič, Commun. Phys. 3, 100 (2020).
  39. A. Nahum, J. Ruhman, S. Vijay, and J. Haah, Phys. Rev. X 7, 031016 (2017).
  40. A. Nahum, S. Vijay, and J. Haah, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021014 (2018).
  41. C. W. von Keyserlingk, T. Rakovszky, F. Pollmann, and S. L. Sondhi, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021013 (2018).
  42. S. J. Reddi, S. Kale, and S. Kumar, International Conference on Learning Representations (2018).
  43. S. Thrun and L. Pratt, in Learning to Learn (Springer Science+Business Media, New York, 1998), pp. 3–17.
  44. E. Campos, A. Nasrallah, and J. Biamonte, Phys. Rev. A 103, 032607 (2021).
  45. T. Brydges, A. Elben, P. Jurcevic, B. Vermersch, C. Maier, B. P. Lanyon, P. Zoller, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Science 364, 260 (2019).
  46. R. J. Lewis-Swan, A. Safavi-Naini, J. J. Bollinger, and A. M. Rey, Nat. Commun. 10, 1581 (2019).
  47. X.-M. Zhang, Z. Wei, R. Asad, X.-C. Yang, and X. Wang, npj Quantum Inf. 5, 85 (2019).
  48. W. Coffey, Y. P. Kalmykov, and J. T. Waldron, The Langevin Equation: With Applications in Physics, Chemistry and Electrical Engineering (World Scientific, Singapore, 1996).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation