- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review Research

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Existence of life in 2 + 1 dimensions

J. H. C. Scargill*

  • Center for Quantum Mathematics and Physics (QMAP), Department of Physics, University of California at Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616, USA

  • *jhcscargill@gmail.com
PDF

Phys. Rev. Research 2, 013217 – Published 26 February, 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013217

Abstract

There are anthropic reasons to suspect that life in more than three spatial dimensions is not possible, and if the same could be said of fewer than three, then one would have an anthropic argument for why we experience precisely three large spatial dimensions. There are two main arguments leveled against the possibility of life in 2+1 dimensions: the lack of a local gravitational force and Newtonian limit in three-dimensional general relativity, and the claim that the restriction to a planar topology means that the possibilities are “too simple” for life to exist. I will examine these arguments and show how a purely scalar theory of gravity may evade the first one, before considering certain families of planar graphs which share properties which are observed in real-life biological neural networks and are argued to be important for their functioning.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (53)

  1. P. Ehrenfest, In what way does it become manifest in the fundamental laws of physics that space has three dimensions? Proc. Amst. Acad. 20, 200 (1918).
  2. G. J. Whitrow, Why physical space has three dimensions, British J. Philos. Sci. 6, 13 (1955).
  3. J. D. Barrow, Dimensionality, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London A 310, 337 (1983).
  4. J. D. Barrow and F. J. Tipler, The Anthropic Cosmological Principle (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1988).
  5. M. Tegmark, On the dimensionality of space-time, Class. Quantum Grav. 14, L69 (1997).
  6. A. Momen and R. Rahman, Spacetime dimensionality from de Sitter entropy, TSPU Bull. 12, 186 (2014).
  7. J. Gonzalez-Ayala, R. Cordero, and F. Angulo-Brown, Is the (3+1)-d nature of the universe a thermodynamic necessity? Europhys. Lett. 113, 40006 (2016).
  8. R. H. Brandenberger and C. Vafa, Superstrings in the early universe, Nucl. Phys. B 316, 391 (1989).
  9. B. Greene, D. Kabat, and S. Marnerides, On three dimensions as the preferred dimensionality of space via the Brandenberger-Vafa mechanism, Phys. Rev. D 88, 043527 (2013).
  10. R. Durrer, M. Kunz, and M. Sakellariadou, Why do we live in 3+1 dimensions? Phys. Lett. B 614, 125 (2005).
  11. H. B. Nielsen and S. E. Rugh, in Proceedings of the 26th International Ahrenshoop Symposium on the Theory of Elementary Particles: Wendisch-Rietz (1993), edited by B. Dorfel and E. Wieczorek (DESY, Zeuthen, Germany, 1993), pp. 307–337.
  12. A. K. Dewdney, Exploring the planiverse, J. Rec. Math. 12, 16 (1979).
  13. A. K. Dewdney, Two Dimensional Science and Technology (London, Ontario, 1980).
  14. A Second Symposium on Two-dimensional Science and Technology, edited by A. K. Dewdney and I. R. Lapidus (London, Ontario, 1983).
  15. A. K. Dewdney, The Planiverse: Computer Contact with a Two-Dimensional World (Springer, New York, 2000).
  16. J. D. Barrow, D. J. Shaw, and C. G. Tsagas, Cosmology in three dimensions: Steps towards the general solution, Class. Quantum Grav. 23, 5291 (2006).
  17. J. D. Barrow, A. B. Burd, and D. Lancaster, Three-dimensional classical spacetimes, Class. Quantum Grav. 3, 551 (1986).
  18. H. H. Soleng, Inverse square law of gravitation in (2+1) dimensional space-time as a consequence of Casimir energy, Phys. Scr. 48, 649 (1993).
  19. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, An Alternative to Compactification, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4690 (1999).
  20. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, and G. R. Dvali, The Hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter, Phys. Lett. B 429, 263 (1998).
  21. N. Kaloper and J. H. C. Scargill, de Sitter branes in a flat bulk of massive gravity, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2019) 132.
  22. R. Albert and A.-L. Barabási, Statistical mechanics of complex networks, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 47 (2002).
  23. M. E. J. Newman, The structure and function of complex networks, SIAM Rev. 45, 167 (2003).
  24. E. Bullmore and O. Sporns, Complex brain networks: Graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 186 (2009).
  25. J. G. White, E. Southgate, J. N. Thomson, and S. Brenner, The structure of the nervous system of the nematode caenorhabditis elegans, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B 314, 1 (1986).
  26. J. Scannell, G. Burns, C. Hilgetag, M. O'Neil, and M. Young, The connectional organization of the Cortico-thalamic system of the cat, Cerebral Cortex 9, 277 (1999).
  27. D. Felleman and D. C Van Essen, Distributed hierarchical processing in primate visual cortex, Cereb. Cortex 1, 1 (1991).
  28. O. Sporns, G. Tononi, and R. Katter, The human connectome: A structural description of the human brain, PLoS Comput. Biol. 1, 245 (2005).
  29. D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz, Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks, Nature (London) 393, 440 (1998).
  30. M. D. Humphries, K. Gurney, and T. J. Prescott, The brainstem reticular formation is a small-world, not scale-free, network, Proc. Roy. Soc. B 273, 503 (2006).
  31. V. Latora and M. Marchiori, Efficient Behavior of Small-World Networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 198701 (2001).
  32. D. S. Bassett and E. T. Bullmore, Small-world brain networks revisited, Neuroscientist 23, 499 (2017).
  33. C. C. Hilgetag and A. Goulas, Is the brain really a small-world network? Brain Struct. Funct. 221, 2361 (2016).
  34. T. Petermann, T. C. Thiagarajan, M. A. Lebedev, M. A. L. Nicolelis, D. R. Chialvo, and D. Plenz, Spontaneous cortical activity in awake monkeys composed of neuronal avalanches, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 15921 (2009).
  35. M. G. Kitzbichler, M. L. Smith, S. R. Christensen, and E. Bullmore, Broadband criticality of human brain network synchronization, PLoS Comput. Biol. 5, 1 (2009).
  36. J. Beggs and N. Timme, Being critical of criticality in the brain, Front. Physiol. 3, 163 (2012).
  37. W. L. Shew and D. Plenz, The functional benefits of criticality in the cortex, Neuroscientist 19, 88 (2013).
  38. R. B. Griffiths, Nonanalytic Behavior Above the Critical Point in a Random Ising Ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 17 (1969).
  39. M. A. Muñoz, R. Juhász, C. Castellano, and G. Ódor, Griffiths Phases on Complex Networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 128701 (2010).
  40. P. Moretti and M. A. Muñoz, Griffiths phases and the stretching of criticality in brain networks, Nat. Commun. 4, 2521 (2013).
  41. G. Ódor, R. Dickman, and G. Ódor, Griffiths phases and localization in hierarchical modular networks, Sci. Rep. 5, 14451 (2015).
  42. A. Denise, M. Vasconcellos, and D. J. A. Welsh, The random planar graph, Congress. Numer. 113, 61 (1996).
  43. M. Bodirsky, C. Gröpl, and M. Kang, Generating labeled planar graphs uniformly at random, Theor. Comput. Sci. 379, 377 (2007).
  44. E. Fusy, Uniform random sampling of planar graphs in linear time, Random Struct. Alg. 35, 464 (2009).
  45. S. Meinert and D. Wagner, An experimental study on generating planar graphs, in Frontiers in Algorithmics and Algorithmic Aspects in Information and Management, edited by M. Atallah, X.-Y. Li, and B. Zhu (Springer, Berlin, 2011), pp. 375–387.
  46. http://www.lix.polytechnique.fr/fusy/Programs/Boltzmann PlanarGraphs.tar.gz (unpublished).
  47. O. Gimenez and M. Noy, The number of planar graphs and properties of random planar graphs, in DMTCS Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Analysis of Algorithms, edited by C. Martínez (DMTCS, Nancy, France, 2005), Vol. AD, pp. 147–156.
  48. Z. Zhang, S. Zhou, L. Fang, J. Guan, and Y. Zhang, Maximal planar scale-free Sierpinski networks with small-world effect and power law strength-degree correlation, Europhys. Lett. 79, 38007 (2007).
  49. L. Chen, F. Comellas, and Z. Zhang, Self-similar planar graphs as models for complex networks, in Proceedings of the 19th International Workshop on Combinatorial Algorithms (IWOCA) 2008, edited by M. Miller and K. Wada (College Publications, London, UK, 2008), pp. 144–154.
  50. E. Mones, L. Vicsek, and T. Vicsek, Hierarchy measure for complex networks, PLoS ONE 7, e33799 (2012).
  51. T. Vojta, Topical review: Rare region effects at classical, quantum and nonequilibrium phase transitions, J. Phys. A 39, R143 (2006).
  52. E. R. J. A. Schrödinger, What is Life? The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1944).
  53. A. Albrecht (private communication).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. Research 2, 013217– Published 26 February, 2020
  • Received 21 August 2019
  • Accepted 3 February 2020
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation