You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
undefined behavior and crashes in case of a bad sys.modules #75585
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
assignee='https://github.com/ericsnowcurrently'closed_at=<Date2017-09-15.22:50:59.825>created_at=<Date2017-09-09.17:36:25.988>labels= ['interpreter-core', '3.7', 'type-crash']
title='undefined behavior and crashes in case of a bad sys.modules'updated_at=<Date2017-09-15.22:51:14.239>user='https://github.com/orenmn'
when run interactively, causes weird behavior, e.g. exit() doesn't exit the
interpreter, and print() doesn't print.
then, pressing Ctrl+C causes 'Assertion failed: !PyErr_Occurred(), file ..\Objects\call.c, line 803'
when run as a script, causes PyImport_Cleanup() to raise a negative ref count
Fatal Python error.
(this is because PyImport_Cleanup() (in Python/import.c) assumes that
PyImport_GetModuleDict() returned a dict.)
IIUC, this bug was introduced in #1638
(which resolved bpo-28411).
This is pretty messy. :( Ideally we would disallow setting sys.modules to anything except a dict (or perhaps any mapping). However, we don't have that option currently (see https://github.com/ericsnowcurrently/cpython/tree/sys-module). In the meantime we have to fix up all the places that are expecting a mapping.
Part of the problem here is that a number of places fail silently, as evidenced by the failures Oren pointed out...
I haven't finished reviewing PR 1638. I'm not sure that this change is worth. It breaks a code that assumes that sys.module is a dict, and I afraid it slows down importing. Maybe revert this change until resolving all problems?
I haven't finished reviewing PR 1638. I'm not sure that this change
is worth. It breaks a code that assumes that sys.module is a dict,
and I afraid it slows down importing. Maybe revert this change until
resolving all problems?
Yeah, I'm leaning that way myself. I'll take another look later today or tomorrow. FWIW, the likelihood of this causing problems to actual users is extremely low, so the urgency to fix this isn't high. Still, I don't want this to linger.
As I said before, ideally we would prevent non-mappings from getting assigned to sys.modules. One alternative would be to introduce sys.__modules__ and fall back to it if sys.modules is invalid.
Introducing sys.__modules__ doesn't solve the problem, since you'd be able to recreate the problems Oren reports just by messing with that as well as with sys.modules.
And we try reasonable hard to protect users from completely breaking the interpreter just by assigning nonsense to sys module attributes.
So my recommendation would be to revert bpo-28411, and make it clearer that the purpose of the interpreter state attribute is to defend against nonsensical rebinding of sys.modules, and that it can't be removed unless/until the sys module is switched to a custom type that enforces type checks on some of its attributes.
Activity
orenmn commentedon Sep 9, 2017
at least on my Windows, the following code:
when run interactively, causes weird behavior, e.g. exit() doesn't exit the
interpreter, and print() doesn't print.
then, pressing Ctrl+C causes 'Assertion failed: !PyErr_Occurred(), file ..\Objects\call.c, line 803'
when run as a script, causes PyImport_Cleanup() to raise a negative ref count
Fatal Python error.
(this is because PyImport_Cleanup() (in Python/import.c) assumes that
PyImport_GetModuleDict() returned a dict.)
IIUC, this bug was introduced in #1638
(which resolved bpo-28411).
ericsnowcurrently commentedon Sep 11, 2017
I'm looking into this.
ericsnowcurrently commentedon Sep 12, 2017
This is pretty messy. :( Ideally we would disallow setting sys.modules to anything except a dict (or perhaps any mapping). However, we don't have that option currently (see https://github.com/ericsnowcurrently/cpython/tree/sys-module). In the meantime we have to fix up all the places that are expecting a mapping.
Part of the problem here is that a number of places fail silently, as evidenced by the failures Oren pointed out...
serhiy-storchaka commentedon Sep 12, 2017
I haven't finished reviewing PR 1638. I'm not sure that this change is worth. It breaks a code that assumes that sys.module is a dict, and I afraid it slows down importing. Maybe revert this change until resolving all problems?
ericsnowcurrently commentedon Sep 12, 2017
Yeah, I'm leaning that way myself. I'll take another look later today or tomorrow. FWIW, the likelihood of this causing problems to actual users is extremely low, so the urgency to fix this isn't high. Still, I don't want this to linger.
As I said before, ideally we would prevent non-mappings from getting assigned to sys.modules. One alternative would be to introduce sys.__modules__ and fall back to it if sys.modules is invalid.
ncoghlan commentedon Sep 13, 2017
Introducing sys.__modules__ doesn't solve the problem, since you'd be able to recreate the problems Oren reports just by messing with that as well as with sys.modules.
And we try reasonable hard to protect users from completely breaking the interpreter just by assigning nonsense to sys module attributes.
So my recommendation would be to revert bpo-28411, and make it clearer that the purpose of the interpreter state attribute is to defend against nonsensical rebinding of sys.modules, and that it can't be removed unless/until the sys module is switched to a custom type that enforces type checks on some of its attributes.
ericsnowcurrently commentedon Sep 14, 2017
New changeset 93c92f7 by Eric Snow in branch 'master':
bpo-31404: Revert "remove modules from Py_InterpreterState (bpo-1638)" (bpo-3565)
93c92f7