You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
file readline, readlines & readall methods can lose data on EINTR #56477
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
assignee='https://github.com/gpshead'closed_at=<Date2013-02-01.21:20:00.128>created_at=<Date2011-06-05.20:39:02.990>labels= []
title='file readline, readlines & readall methods can lose data on EINTR'updated_at=<Date2016-11-15.14:36:08.044>user='https://github.com/gpshead'
The file object readline() and readlines() methods can lose data when an underlying read system call is interrupted. They will abort with an IOError in this case but any incomplete line data they have read will be discarded.
readline() and readlines() should never raise an IOError for the EINTR interrupted system call case. They should handle that gracefully, retrying their reads after letting any Python signal handlers run.
changed the title [-]file readline & readlines methods can lose data on EINTR[/-][+]file readline, readlines & readall methods can lose data on EINTR[/+]on Jun 6, 2011
I'm not sure why you're creating a separate test file. There are already signals-related tests in test_io. Also, perhaps you can reuse the idioms used there, rather than spawn subprocesses.
I'm leaving this open as I still need to audit the write methods and commit the fix(es) for 2.7.
I tried to merge the test into test_io's signals tests but I could not get that to actually work to reproduce the original problem so I kept my process based test_file_eintr one which easily reproduces it prior to these patches being applied instead.
For the record, there was a crash on the ARM buildbot:
[196/368/1] test_io
Timeout (1:00:00)!
Thread 0x2aac5300:
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/test/test_io.py", line 3051 in check_interrupted_write_retry
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/test/test_io.py", line 3073 in test_interrupted_write_retry_text
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/unittest/case.py", line 385 in _executeTestPart
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/unittest/case.py", line 440 in run
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/unittest/case.py", line 492 in __call__
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/unittest/suite.py", line 105 in run
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/unittest/suite.py", line 67 in __call__
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/unittest/suite.py", line 105 in run
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/unittest/suite.py", line 67 in __call__
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/unittest/runner.py", line 168 in run
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/test/support.py", line 1383 in _run_suite
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/test/support.py", line 1417 in run_unittest
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/test/test_io.py", line 3121 in test_main
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/test/regrtest.py", line 1194 in runtest_inner
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/test/regrtest.py", line 905 in runtest
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/test/regrtest.py", line 708 in main
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/test/main.py", line 13 in <module>
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/runpy.py", line 75 in _run_code
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/runpy.py", line 162 in _run_module_as_main
make: *** [buildbottest] Error 1
The 3.* ubuntu arm buildbot hanging in test_io is very odd.
I'm going to undo my supposedly straight forward signal.alarm(...) to signal.setitimer(...) change first to see if that is related.
python-dev commented on Jun 25, 2012
python-devmannequin
Mannequin
More actions
New changeset 95b071194ddd by Gregory P. Smith in branch '3.2':
Backout change e8f44ebacda7052267318cecf5b6f128d35add17. Reverting the test http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/95b071194ddd
New changeset b4ae7aa21b46 by Gregory P. Smith in branch 'default':
Backout change e8f44ebacda7052267318cecf5b6f128d35add17. Reverting the test http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/b4ae7aa21b46
New changeset 2fd669aa4abc by Gregory P. Smith in branch '3.2':
Additional fix for Issue bpo-12268: The io module file object writelines() methods no longer abort early when one of its write system calls is interrupted (EINTR). http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/2fd669aa4abc
New changeset a5e7b38caee2 by Gregory P. Smith in branch '2.7':
Additional fix for Issue bpo-12268: The io module file object writelines() methods http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/a5e7b38caee2
New changeset 2fd669aa4abc by Gregory P. Smith in branch '3.2':
Additional fix for Issue bpo-12268: The io module file object writelines() methods no longer abort early when one of its write system calls is interrupted (EINTR). http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/2fd669aa4abc
New changeset 30fc620e240e by Gregory P. Smith in branch '3.3':
Additional fix for issue bpo-12268: The io module file object write methods no http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/30fc620e240e
New changeset 8f72519fd0e9 by Gregory P. Smith in branch 'default':
Additional fix for issue bpo-12268: The io module file object write methods no http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/8f72519fd0e9
it was easier to just take care of auditing the write calls as part of this given the code change was directly related to it.
On Python 2.7 most of the write calls in the builtin file object (Objects/fileobject.c) rather than the new io module use the libc fwrite() call which, in linux man pages at least, is non-specific about what happens on EINTR (does it retry internally or does it return the number of bytes written so far?). Those could well abort leading to an error.
Setting up a testcase fo to confirm that with is painful (time consuming) so I can't claim the non io module based write's do not still have an EINTR issue on 2.7.
Workaround: Use the io module instead of the builtin open() or file() calls in Python 2.7.
If someone can confirm that with a test case, it'd make another good issue to open.
Activity
gpshead commentedon Jun 5, 2011
The file object readline() and readlines() methods can lose data when an underlying read system call is interrupted. They will abort with an IOError in this case but any incomplete line data they have read will be discarded.
readline() and readlines() should never raise an IOError for the EINTR interrupted system call case. They should handle that gracefully, retrying their reads after letting any Python signal handlers run.
gpshead commentedon Jun 5, 2011
3.x has the same issue. unittest & patch forthcoming that addresses that as well.
2.6 also has the issue but it is in security fix only mode so I won't backport to that.
gpshead commentedon Jun 6, 2011
.readall() and the equivalent unbounded .read() also have this problem.
[-]file readline & readlines methods can lose data on EINTR[/-][+]file readline, readlines & readall methods can lose data on EINTR[/+]gpshead commentedon Jun 6, 2011
I haven't looked beyond the reading methods it is possible that some of the write implementations have a similar issue. Patch gps02 for 3.2 attached.
I'll use that as the basis for a stand alone test_file_eintr.py targeted at 2.7.
pitrou commentedon Jun 7, 2011
I'm not sure why you're creating a separate test file. There are already signals-related tests in test_io. Also, perhaps you can reuse the idioms used there, rather than spawn subprocesses.
python-dev commentedon Jun 24, 2012
New changeset 781b95159954 by Gregory P. Smith in branch '3.2':
Fixes issue bpo-12268: File readline, readlines and read() or readall() methods
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/781b95159954
New changeset 19a6bef57490 by Gregory P. Smith in branch 'default':
Fixes issue bpo-12268: File readline, readlines and read() or readall() methods
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/19a6bef57490
gpshead commentedon Jun 24, 2012
I'm leaving this open as I still need to audit the write methods and commit the fix(es) for 2.7.
I tried to merge the test into test_io's signals tests but I could not get that to actually work to reproduce the original problem so I kept my process based test_file_eintr one which easily reproduces it prior to these patches being applied instead.
pitrou commentedon Jun 24, 2012
For the record, there was a crash on the ARM buildbot:
[196/368/1] test_io
Timeout (1:00:00)!
Thread 0x2aac5300:
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/test/test_io.py", line 3051 in check_interrupted_write_retry
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/test/test_io.py", line 3073 in test_interrupted_write_retry_text
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/unittest/case.py", line 385 in _executeTestPart
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/unittest/case.py", line 440 in run
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/unittest/case.py", line 492 in __call__
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/unittest/suite.py", line 105 in run
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/unittest/suite.py", line 67 in __call__
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/unittest/suite.py", line 105 in run
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/unittest/suite.py", line 67 in __call__
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/unittest/runner.py", line 168 in run
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/test/support.py", line 1383 in _run_suite
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/test/support.py", line 1417 in run_unittest
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/test/test_io.py", line 3121 in test_main
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/test/regrtest.py", line 1194 in runtest_inner
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/test/regrtest.py", line 905 in runtest
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/test/regrtest.py", line 708 in main
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/test/main.py", line 13 in <module>
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/runpy.py", line 75 in _run_code
File "/var/lib/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.warsaw-ubuntu-arm/build/Lib/runpy.py", line 162 in _run_module_as_main
make: *** [buildbottest] Error 1
gpshead commentedon Jun 25, 2012
I'm attaching an updated patch for 2.7. It fixes read, readline, readlines and readinto and includes tests.
More code auditing for other methods to fix is still needed.
gpshead commentedon Jun 25, 2012
The 3.* ubuntu arm buildbot hanging in test_io is very odd.
I'm going to undo my supposedly straight forward signal.alarm(...) to signal.setitimer(...) change first to see if that is related.
python-dev commentedon Jun 25, 2012
New changeset 95b071194ddd by Gregory P. Smith in branch '3.2':
Backout change e8f44ebacda7052267318cecf5b6f128d35add17. Reverting the test
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/95b071194ddd
New changeset b4ae7aa21b46 by Gregory P. Smith in branch 'default':
Backout change e8f44ebacda7052267318cecf5b6f128d35add17. Reverting the test
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/b4ae7aa21b46
pitrou commentedon Jun 25, 2012
I don't think setitimer() is the culprit, rather the fact that the timeout is too short. You could try setting it to e.g. 0.4.
python-dev commentedon Jun 26, 2012
New changeset 67dc99a989cd by Gregory P. Smith in branch '2.7':
Fixes issue bpo-12268 for file readline, readlines and read() and readinto methods.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/67dc99a989cd
gpshead commentedon Jun 26, 2012
The uses of fwrite() and fflush() also need this EINTR treatment in 2.7. I haven't checked the write paths in 3.2 yet.
Also, the fix change to 3.2's _io module needs backporting to 2.7's _io module for people using that.
python-dev commentedon Oct 12, 2012
New changeset 751a91e332d9 by Gregory P. Smith in branch '2.7':
Fixes Issue bpo-12268 for the io module - File readline, readlines and
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/751a91e332d9
pitrou commentedon Dec 4, 2012
Is there anything left to do here?
gpshead commentedon Dec 4, 2012
Yes. See my comment from June. The write paths need to be taken care of.
pitrou commentedon Dec 4, 2012
Well, this issue is about "readline, readlines & readall". It would be easier to follow if you opened a separate issue.
python-dev commentedon Feb 1, 2013
New changeset a5e7b38caee2 by Gregory P. Smith in branch '2.7':
Additional fix for Issue bpo-12268: The io module file object writelines() methods
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/a5e7b38caee2
New changeset 2fd669aa4abc by Gregory P. Smith in branch '3.2':
Additional fix for Issue bpo-12268: The io module file object writelines() methods no longer abort early when one of its write system calls is interrupted (EINTR).
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/2fd669aa4abc
New changeset 30fc620e240e by Gregory P. Smith in branch '3.3':
Additional fix for issue bpo-12268: The io module file object write methods no
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/30fc620e240e
New changeset 8f72519fd0e9 by Gregory P. Smith in branch 'default':
Additional fix for issue bpo-12268: The io module file object write methods no
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/8f72519fd0e9
vstinner commentedon Feb 1, 2013
Oh, so we can now implement a version of writelines() using writev()!
2013/2/1 Roundup Robot <report@bugs.python.org>:
gpshead commentedon Feb 1, 2013
it was easier to just take care of auditing the write calls as part of this given the code change was directly related to it.
On Python 2.7 most of the write calls in the builtin file object (Objects/fileobject.c) rather than the new io module use the libc fwrite() call which, in linux man pages at least, is non-specific about what happens on EINTR (does it retry internally or does it return the number of bytes written so far?). Those could well abort leading to an error.
Setting up a testcase fo to confirm that with is painful (time consuming) so I can't claim the non io module based write's do not still have an EINTR issue on 2.7.
Workaround: Use the io module instead of the builtin open() or file() calls in Python 2.7.
If someone can confirm that with a test case, it'd make another good issue to open.
As for the writev comment... go ahead. :)
mjpieters commentedon Nov 15, 2016
Follow-up bug, readahead was missed: http://bugs.python.org/issue1633941