Errata

Verified (1)

RFC 4868 inline-errata

Source of RFC: IETF - NON WORKING GROUP

Errata-ID: 1785

Status:: Verified
Type:: Technical
Reported By:: Sheila Frankel
Date Reported:: 2009-05-19
Verified by:: Pasi Eronen
Date Verified:: 2009-05-27

Section 2.7.2.3 says:

Test Case AUTH512-4:
   Key =          0a0b0c0d0e0f10111213141516171819
                  0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f10
                  1112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f20
                  2122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f30
                  3132333435363738393a3b3c3d3e3f40  (64 bytes)

It should say:

Test Case AUTH512-4:
   Key =          0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f10
                  1112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f20
                  2122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f30
                  3132333435363738393a3b3c3d3e3f40  (64 bytes)

Notes:

Originally noted by Tero Kivinen

Held for Document Update (1)

RFC 4868 inline-errata

Source of RFC: IETF - NON WORKING GROUP

Errata-ID: 5507

Status:: Held for Document Update
Type:: Technical
Reported By:: f. Le Pouliquen
Date Reported:: 2018-09-27
Held for Document Update by:: Deb Cooley
Date Held for Document Update:: 2025-04-03

Section 2.7.2.2. says:

Test Case AUTH384-4:
   Key =          0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f10
                  1112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f20
                  0a0b0c0d0e0f10111213141516171819

It should say:

Test Case AUTH384-4:
   Key =          0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f10
                  1112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f20
                  2122232425262728292a2b2c2d2e2f30

Notes:

as the keys increase from case 256 to 384 and to 512, they have the same base.

Report New Erratum