Skip to main content
Genes & Diseases logoLink to Genes & Diseases
. 2025 Nov 1;13(3):101916. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2025.101916

Pathogenic variation in human DNA damage repair genes was originated from the evolutionary process of modern humans

Jiaheng Li a,b, Bojin Zhao b, Zixin Qin b,c, Si Hoi Kou b,d, Jia Sheng Chian b, Fengxia Xiao b,e, Huijun Lei b,f, Stephanie Andaluz b, Jun He b,g, Siddharth Sinha b, Xiaowei Mao h,i,⁎⁎, San Ming Wang b,⁎
PMCID: PMC12859193  PMID: 41624906

Abstract

DNA damage repair (DDR) genes play critical roles in maintaining genome stability. However, they are prone to genetic variation, of which pathogenic variation (PV) is a predisposing factor for high risk of cancer development in modern humans. Knowing the origin of DDR PV is critical for understanding the genetic basis and developing strategies against cancer risk for modern humans. So far, there is no consensus on the original sources of DDR PV in modern humans. We performed phylogenic analysis, and the results ruled out non-human species as the original source for the PV in modern humans through evolutionary conservation. We performed anthropological analyses by tracing the PV from modern humans in over 5000 ancient humans spanning the past 40,000 years. We observed a widespread distribution of DDR PV shared between modern and ancient humans. The shared DDR PV was predominantly found in modern non-Africans within the past 10,000 years rather than in modern Africans, highlighting that the arising time should be post the latest Out-of-Africa human migration. We also observed the rich distribution of Portuguese BRCA founder PV in Brazilian, highlighting that human admixture facilitated DDR PV transmission globally between ethnic human populations. The shorter arising time of DDR PV was further supported by the haplotyping results of DDR founder PV in multiple DDR genes and the predominant heterozygotic nature of DDR PV. Our comprehensive investigation reveals that DDR PV was mainly originated from the recent evolutionary history of modern humans, and highlights that the high cancer risk caused by DDR PV in modern humans is a by-product of the human evolution process.

Keywords: Ancient DNA, Anthropologic, Cancer predisposition, DNA damage repair genes, Evolutionary origin, Pathogenic variation, Phylogenic

Introduction

DDR genes and pathogenic variants

The human genome can be damaged by different factors. In order to maintain the integrity of the genome, efficient repair of the damaged DNA is essential. This task is performed by the DNA damage repair (DDR) system formed during the evolutionary process, consisting of nine distinct pathways with hundreds of genes.1,2 These pathways are evolutionarily conserved, exhibiting remarkable specificity in repairing different types of DNA lesions: the base excision repair (BER) pathway targets small DNA lesions; the direct reversal (DR) pathway repairs ubiquitous alkylation damage; the Fanconi anemia (FA) pathway resolves strand cross-link damages; the homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathways facilitate the repair of double-strand broken DNA; the mismatch repair (MMR) pathway corrects mismatch errors; and the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway fixs helix-distorting DNA damage.1,2 The intricate repairing network ensures rapid and efficient DNA repair, thereby maintaining genomic stability and cellular homeostasis.

DDR genes are highly vulnerable to germline variation.2 Based on the functional impact of variation, a variant can be classified as Pathogenic, Likely Pathogenic, Variant of Unknown Significance (VUS), Likely Benign, or Benign.3 While most variations are benign in promoting survival and fitness or VUS, a portion of the variation is pathogenic (PVs) in damaging the function of the affected DDR genes and related pathways, leading to genome instability triggering pathological consequences. Germline DDR PVs are well-determined as genetic predisposition for elevated risk of human disorders, particularly cancer.3, 4, 5, 6 DDR PVs also serve as genetic markers in clinical diagnosis and intervention of cancer.7,8 For example, the PVs in BRCA (BRCA1 and BRCA2) damage the function of the homologous recombination pathway in repairing double strand broken DNA,9 causing high risk of breast and ovarian cancer10, 11, 12; the PVs in MMR genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) impair the function of the DNA mismatch repair pathway, causing high risk of Lynch syndrome, a type of cancer mainly affecting the digestion system.13,14 The PVs in the BRCA and MMR genes are widely used clinically in the evaluation, intervention, prognosis and prevention of breast, ovarian, and colon cancers.15 Since the early 1990s when the correlation between BRCA1 variation and breast cancer risk was established,16 constant efforts have been made to identify DDR PVs and to promote their clinical applications.17, 18, 19 The ClinVar database, one of the major databases in hosting human germline variants including DDR PVs, serves as a reference hub for DDR PV-related clinical applications.20 The database encompassed 20,272 pathogenic variants in 91 DDR genes,21 including 4,530 PVs in BRCA1 and 5,648 PVs in BRCA2 (Fig. 1) (ClinVar database, accessed August 8, 2024).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

DDR PVs. (A) DDR genes and PVs in The ClinVar database. (B) Distribution of BRCA1 PVs in BRCA1 coding exons. DDR: DNA damage repair; PVs: pathogenic variants.

The note that “nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution” (Dobzhansky, 1973) emphasizes the importance of understanding the nature of biology from evolutionary perspectives.22 Knowing the evolutionary origin of DDR PVs is essential for understanding the genetic basis of cancer risk, and developing strategies to control cancer risk in humans.23 Despite the germline nature, medical importance, and extensive efforts made in the past decades, however, knowledge for the evolutionary origin of human DDR PVs stays largely unclear. Efforts made so far were restricted by analyzing a small number of variants, mostly benign, in limited DDR genes, and focusing on cross-species conservation through phylogenetic analysis (Table 1). For example, of the 98 BRCA variants analyzed in previous studies, only 4 were PVs. As such, the information from previous studies is mostly irrelevant to DDR PVs in modern humans.24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 So far, there is no consensus on the evolutionary origin of DDR PVs in humans.

Table 1.

Previous evolutionary studies on DDR gene variation.21

Class (ClinVar) DDR genes
Total (%)
BRCA1 BRCA2 XPC XPA RAD51 POLD1 LATS1 APC
Pathogenic 4 1 9 3 1 0 0 4 22 (16.7)
Benign 36 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 (33.3)
Uncertain significance 45 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 48 (36.4)
Conflict interpretations 12 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 15 (11.4)
Not provided 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 (2.3)
Total (%) 98 (74.2) 14 (10.6) 9 (6.8) 3 (2.3) 2 (1.5) 1 (0.8) 1 (0.8) 4 (3.0) 132 (100)

Evolutionary origin of human DDR PVs

Aiming to fulfill the knowledge gap, we performed a systematic study to investigate the origin of DDR PVs in modern humans.21,33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 We hypothesized that DDR PVs in modern humans could only originate from three possible sources: 1) From the non-human species through cross-species conservation44; 2) From human themselves during the human evolution process45; or 3) From both resources.

The human DDR PV was not from other species

We applied a phylogenic approach to test whether non-human species could contribute to DDR PVs in modern humans. We traced the 7432 DDR PVs identified from modern humans in 99 vertebrate species in eight clades of Fish, Sarcopterygii, Aves, Mammalia, Afrotheria, Laurasiatheria, Euarchontoglires, and Primate. We observed that 1) 79.9% (5,935) of the 7432 PVs were absent in the 99 species. 2) Of the 20.1% (1,497) PVs shared with these species, they were mostly present in the distal species of Sarcopterygii and Aves. For the 53 DDR PVs shared with the species in Primate, 23 (43.4%) were shared with Bushbaby, the species distal to the humans within the Primate clade, and only one PV shared with Orangutan. Gorilla and chimpanzee didn't share any human DDR PVs, although they are the closest species to the humans (Fig. 2). The results demonstrated that DDR PVs in modern humans were unlikely to be inherited from non-human species via cross-species conservation.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Phylogenetic analysis of DDR PVs. It shows the distribution of the shared 1,504 human DDR PVs in 66 DDR genes in 99 vertebrate species within 8 clades, mostly in the species distal from humans. X-axis: the 1,504 PVs in DDR genes; Y-axis: 99 vertebrate species. Red spots: the human PVs shared with non-human species. DDR, DNA damage repair; PVs, pathogenic variants.

The human DDR PV was originated from human themselves

To test the hypothesis that whether DDR PVs in modern humans could be originated from human themselves, we applied an archeological approach by taking advantage of rich genomic DNA sequences available from ancient humans.

Collecting genome sequences from ancient humans

It is well recognized that human genetic variation was largely arisen in recent human history.46 However, it mainly refers to the biological adaptation-related, non-pathogenic variation. For the origin of DDR PVs in modern humans, it remains largely unclear. A comparison of genomic sequences between ancient humans and modern humans can provide clues to address the issue. However, it was technically impossible to do so before due to the lack of ancient human genomic sequences. As such, existing studies were mostly restricted to limited founder PVs in a few DDR genes through haplotyping47 and molecular clock calculation.48 However, the rapid development of ancient DNA extraction technologies in recent years has revolutionized the field. Genome sequences are available now from over 5000 ancient humans dated back to the latest human Out-of-Africa migration 50,000 to 60,000 years before present (BP) and the extinct hominins of Neanderthals and Denisovans.49,50 For the first time, it is possible to trace the origin of modern human genetic variations in ancient humans.51,52 For example, genetic variants in SLC22A4 predisposing high coronary heart disease risk were identified in a 5300 years old glacier mummy “Iceman Ötzi”,53 genetic variants in EPAS1 enhancing human adaptation to hypoxia were identified in Denisovans,53,54 and genetic traits for human susceptibility to COVID-19 infection and Dupuytren's Disease were identified in Neanderthals.55,56 However, the studies have predominantly focused on genetic variations associated with adaptive changes in response to selective pressures from climate, lifestyle, and infectious diseases etc. No attempts have been made to address the origin of DDR PVs that predispose modern humans to cancer, the most devastating threats to human health.

We collected genome sequences from 5031 published ancient human genomes dated from 45,045 to 100 years BP, 12 Neanderthals dated from 120,000 to 38,515 years BP, and 4 Denisovans dated from 158,500 to 69,650 years BP.21 We then searched DDR PVs in the ancient humans. The quality of DNA extracted from ancient humans is critical to ensure the reliability of the data generated. Nowadays, the technologies for extracting DNA from ancient humans are highly advanced because of the outstanding work by the leading laboratories and scientists such as Svante Pääbo,57 and standard protocols and strict extraction conditions are widely adapted to control the quality of the DNA extracted from ancient humans. The sources of DNA damage in ancient samples have been well determined, such as the exogenous microbe contamination in ancient samples and modern human DNA contamination during the process of DNA extraction; fragmentation of ancient DNA with breaks enriched next to purines; deaminated cytosine (C) to uracil (U) in ancient DNA caused mispairing during PCR amplification, resulting in C to T substitution in the amplified DNA; and oxidized pyrimidines and cross-links blocking amplification of the affected region in ancient DNA. Effective measures have been developed to maximally prevent the influence of these artifacts to ensure the integrity of the extracted DNA and the data derived from ancient DNA. For example, stringent laboratory protocols now cover the entire process of ancient DNA extraction, library preparation, DNA sequencing, and sequence analysis, such as the controlled laboratory environments for DNA extraction, amplification and indexing, and the use of uracil-DNA glycosylase with endonuclease VIII to limit uracil-driven mis-incorporation. Tight quality control during sequence analysis also plays crucial roles in further eliminating the artifacts, such as excluding terminal bases, eliminating duplicates and low-quality sequences, and removing the sequences from contaminated human mitochondria DNA and nuclear DNA. In our studies, we further applied two extra steps to ensure the reliability of DDR PVs derived from the ancient DNA sequences, including the use of binary-based, curated, quality-controlled BAM files rather than the raw text-based FASTQ read files, and the use of well-annotated DDR PVs in the ClinVar database as the references to determine their presence in ancient DNA rather than calling DDR PVs directly from ancient DNA sequences. These extra steps compensated for the inability of performing technical replicate validation due to the limitation of lacking ancient DNA samples.

Identifying DDR PVs conserved between modern and ancient humans

We searched the ancient humans for the presence of 1781 DDR PVs in 87 DDR genes identified in modern humans and validated them in ClinVar.41 We identified 1266 PVs in 73 DDR genes in 1019 ancient humans (Table 2; Table S1), accounting for 71% (1266/1781) of DDR PVs present in the modern human population. We constructed a database to host DDR PVs from ancient humans (https://genemutation.boboz.io/dbddr-AncientHumans).

Table 2.

DDR PVs identified in ancient humans.

A. PVs identified in DDR pathways
DDR pathways DDR genes Ancient humans
Modern humansb
Gene with PVs (%) No. PVs Genes with PVs (%) No. PVs
Fanconi anemia (FA) 49 27 (55) 615 30 (61) 926
Homologous Recombination (HR) 37 21 (57) 636 21 (57) 916
Mismatch Repair (MMR) 22 8 (36) 225 8 (36) 188
Nucleotide Excision Repair (NER) 42 13 (31) 95 13 (31) 163
Nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) 13 6 (46) 64 7 (54) 129
DNA damage response (DDR) 15 3 (20) 82 5 (33) 86
Base Excision Repair (BER) 32 7 (22) 46 7 (22) 72
DNA replication (DR) 34 12 (35) 36 11 (32) 36
Totala 169 73 (43) 1,266 81 (48) 1,781
B. PVs identified in DDR genes
Gene PVs Gene PVs
ATM 147 RAD51 5
BRCA2 122 XPA 5
BRCA1 116 ATR 4
FANCA 67 DCLRE1C 4
MLH1 66 ERCC4 4
MSH2 59 LIG4 4
TP53 50 NHEJ1 4
PALB2 48 RAD54L 4
MSH6 46 RNASEH2C 4
RAD50 38 SLX4 4
MUTYH 33 SSBP1 4
BRIP1 33 XRCC4 4
PMS2 32 ERCC1 3
ERCC6 30 FAN1 3
BARD1 28 RNASEH1 3
CHEK2 28 TELO2 3
NBN 24 FANCF 2
BLM 21 GTF2H5 2
FANCC 17 LIG1 2
RAD51D 16 LIG3 2
MSH3 15 MCM2 2
FANCD2 12 RBBP8 2
RAD51C 12 XRCC2 2
XPC 12 MCM7 2
ERCC2 11 RAD51B 1
FANCI 11 DDB2 1
FANCG 10 DNA2 1
MRE11 10 FANCL 1
ERCC3 9 MCM5 1
ERCC8 8 POLD1 1
RNASEH2B 8 TOP3A 1
ERCC5 7 UBE2T 1
RNASEH2A 7 UIMC1 1
FANCE 6 UNG 1
FANCM 6 XRCC1 1
NTHL1 6 MCM4 1
POLH 5

DDR:DNA damage repair; PVs:pathogenic variants.

a

Nonredundant numbers.

b

Qin et al, 2022.41

The shared DDR PVs showed the following features:

  • 1.

    Narrow range of arising time. The majority of ancient PV carriers were dated within the last 10,000 years BP (Fig. 3A) with an enriched range between 5000 and 1000 years BP, except for a few ancient carriers out of the range. The oldest PV was BRCA1 c.181T > G p.(Cys61Gly) present in a Russia carrier dated 37,470 years BP, and the youngest PVs were MSH2 c.1204C > T p.(Gln402∗), MUTYH c.437G > A p.(Trp146∗) and RNASEH2A c.69G > A p.(=) present in a Vanuatu carrier dated 190 years BP (Fig. 3B and Table S1);

  • 2.

    Modern and ancient humans had similar loads of DDR PVs. Comparing with the 1,781 PVs in 81 DDR genes identified in global ethnic populations,51 we observed similar quantitative loads of DDR PVs between ancient humans and modern humans, except for the PVs in TP53, MLH1, and MSH2, which showed lower loads in modern humans than in ancient humans (Fig. 3C).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Archeological analysis of human DDR PVs. (A) Dated ancient human carriers sharing DDR PVs in modern humans. It shows that most ancient PV carriers were present within the recent 10,000 years BP. X-axis: number of PVs; Y-axis: dated ancient PV carriers (only 1,161 in X-axis, as 110 of the 1,266 ancient samples had no dating information). (B) Dated ancient human carriers carrying human DDR PVs in different DDR pathways. It shows the arising time of DDR PVs in different DDR pathways were enriched between 5,000 and 1,000 years BP. Red dot: the first PV identified in a DDR gene; black dot: different PVs after the first PV identified in the same DDR gene; orange star: the earliest founder mutations identified by haplotyping analysis. (C) Load of DDR PVs between modern humans and ancient humans. It shows that the loading pattern of DDR PVs was similar between ancient and modern humans, except for the PVs in MLH1, MSH2 and TP53 that were higher in ancient humans but lower in modern humans. DDR:DNA damage repair; PVs:pathogenic variations.

Identifying modern human DDR PVs sharing with Neanderthals and Denisovans

The human genome inherited 2%–4% of DNA from extinct Neanderthals and Denisovans by admixture.58,59 This suggests a possibility that certain disease susceptibility in modern humans could be originated from the extinct hominins.60, 61, 62 Indeed, we identified a set of modern human DDR PVs in Neanderthals and Denisovans, including 4 TP53 PVs in three Neanderthals dated 44,000, 42,540 and 38,515 years BP, two TP53 PVs in a Denisovan dated 158,550 years BP, 3 ATM PVs, 1 BRCA2 PV and 1 CHEK2 PV in 5 Neanderthals dated 80,000 to 50,000 years BP (Fig. 4).21 These findings suggest that certain cancer predisposition alleles in modern humans were likely originated from Neanderthal and Denisovan.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

DDR PVs shared between modern humans and Neanderthals. The figure shows DDR PVs in the ATM, BRCA2, CHEK2, and TP53 genes across different time periods and geographical regions. Dashed arrows indicate specific variants (c.5918+1G > A, c.8584+1G > A, c.517G > A, c.542G > A, and c.473G > A) shared between ancient humans and Neanderthals. X-axis: time ranging from 160,000 to the present (years). Circles with different colors: geographic locations of PV carriers in modern humans. Asia: orange; Europe: blue; Africa: gray; South America: red; North America: pink; Oceania: green. DDR, DNA damage repair; PVs, pathogenic variations.

Out of Africa migration was a major landmark for DDR PVs arising in modern humans

Our research supports the emergence of DDR PVs within human populations (Fig. 3A and B). However, the precise time for PV arising remains uncertain considering the long evolutionary history of humans. It is well determined that the genetic diversity of modern humans was strongly influenced by the latest Out-of-Africa migration.63 We hypothesized that the Out-of-Africa migration could be a cutting point for the arising of DDR PVs in modern humans due to bottleneck effects, adaptation, and selection after the migration.

To test the hypothesis, we first identified 260 DDR PVs from 28,872 modern Africans and 974 DDR PVs from 222,342 modern non-Africans from public resources. We then used the 1,266 DDR PVs identified from the ancient humans as the intermediator to compare the two datasets. The results show differential sharing of ancient DDR PVs: 70% of ancient DDR PVs were shared with non-Africans only, 26.7% with both Africans and non-Africans, and 3.8% shared with Africans only, suggesting that the majority of DDR PVs in modern humans were closer to the ancient humans than modern Africans did (Fig. 5A). However, the results might be biased due to the different sample sizes between modern Africans (n = 28,872) and non-Africans (n = 222,342) used in the comparison. To test the possibility, we performed a rarefaction analysis by defining 15 targeted subgroups from n = 1,000 to n = 28,872 for the 222,342 non-Africans. For each subgroup, we randomly drew n individuals from 222,342, and repeated the process 1000 times. We then identified DDR PVs in each subgroup and searched for their presence in ancient humans. The results showed that the ancient-shared PVs in the non-Africans remained remarkedly higher (median = 49.5%, 95th percentile = 51.5%) than those in the Africans (17.3%, 95th percentile = 18.5%) (Fig. 5B), indicating that regardless of balanced or unbalanced sample sizes, DDR PVs in modern humans were closer to the ancient humans than modern Africans did. Therefore, the results support the conclusion that most of DDR PVs in modern humans arose after the Out-of-Africa human migration. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that the limited data from Africans may still influence the accuracy of the conclusion. Future studies incorporating more data from Africans, either ancient or modern, should refine the conclusion more precisely.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Comparison of DDR PVs among ancient humans, modern Africans, and non-Africans. (A) Distribution of DDR pathogenic variants across ancient and modern populations. Venn diagram illustrating the overlap of DDR PVs between ancient humans, modern Africans, and non-Africans. It shows substantially higher variant sharing between ancient humans and non-Africans than between ancient humans and Africans; (B) Rarefaction analysis ofDDR PVs among ancient humans, modern Africans, and non-Africans. X-axis: downsized sample numbers. It shows that under the same sample size between non-Africans and Africans, non-Africans shared much more DDR PVs with ancient humans than Africans did. Y-axis: proportion of DDR PVs in non-Africans and Africans present in ancient humans; Circles: the median sharing values across 1,000 samples in each subgroup; lines: DDR PVs shared with ancient DDR PVs following increased sample sizes until 28,872; blue: non-Africans, green: Africans. DDR: DNA damage repair; PVs:pathogenic variants.

Human admixture promoted the transmission of DDR PVs between ethnic populations

The global exploration initiated in the15th century by the Europeans caused one of the most extensive admixtures in modern humans.63 For example, the global exploration by Portuguese in the 15th century generated more than 20 million admixture population worldwide nowadays with Portuguese heritage, as exemplified by the over 5 million Brazilian population carrying Portuguese heritage.64 We hypothesized that disease susceptibility in certain ethnic populations could be transmitted to other populations through admixture. We tested our hypothesis by searching for the Portuguese BRCA founder PVs in the Brazilian population. From the 255 BRCA PVs identified in 7,711 Brazilians, 29 BRCA PVs were found to be originated from the Portuguese, including 14 BRCA1 Portuguese founder PVs, and 15 BRCA2 Portuguese founder PVs.43 These results confirm that DDR PV-related cancer susceptibility is indeed transmittable through human admixture.

Arising timing of DDR PVs validated by haplotyping-determined DDR founder PVs

Our research revealed that human DDR PVs were mainly originated from human themselves in the past few thousand years. Historically, the arising time for many well-known DDR founder PVs has been determined via the haplotyping method.65 We used the determined arising time of these DDR founder PVs as the references to validate the arising times of DDR PVs determined by our study. We collected the dated time from 68 founder PVs in seven DDR genes, including BRCA1, BRCA2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, MUTYH and TP53. The arising time for these founder PVs were all within the recent 4,000 years BP except MUTYH c.1103G > A dated 8,675 years BP and MUTYH c.452A > G dated 7,500 years BP. For example, in the three BRCA founder PVs in Ashkenazi Jewish, BRCA1 185delAG (c.68_69del) was 1,500–750 years BP,66 BRCA1 5382insC (c.5266dup) was 1,800 years BP,67 and BRCA2 6174delT (c.5946del) was 580 years BP68; the BRCA1 c.4035delA in Balts was 1,550 years BP69; BRCA2 c.771_775del in Icelander was 500 years BP70; BRCA2 c.7480C > T and c.8327 T > G in Finnish were 400–200 BP and 220–140 years BP71; TP53 c.1010G > A in Brazilian was 2,000 years BP.72 The arising timing determined by haplotyping analysis is well within the scope dated by our anthological analysis, further supporting the short history of DDR PVs in modern humans (Table 3).

Table 3.

Arose time of DDR founder PVs by haplotyping analysis.21

Gene cDNA Protein Pubmed ID Ethnic population Years BP
MUTYH c.1103G > A p.Gly368Asp 23361220 European 8,675
MUTYH c.452A > G p.Tyr151Cys 23361220 European 7,500
BRCA1 c.5503C > T p.Arg1835∗ 35377490 Pakistani 3,800
BRCA1 c.3228_3229del p.Gly1077AlafsTer8 18821011 Italian 3,225
BRCA1 c.4096+1G > A – 37958491 Italian 3,000
BRCA2 c.9026_9030del p.Tyr3009SerfsTer7 12655574 Northeast Spanish 2,760
BRCA2 c.156_157insAlu – 34087993 Portuguese 2,600–2,400
BRCA1 c.3331_3334del p.Gln1111AsnfsTer5 33087180 Iberia 2,400–1,600
MLH1 c.306+5G > A – 20858721 Spanish 2,200
MUTYH c.849+3A > C – 22865608 Italian 2,075
BRCA1 c.4327C > T p.Arg1443Ter 15883839 Canadian 2,000
TP53 c.1010G > A p.Arg337His 26618902 Brazilian 2,000
BRCA2 c.5116_5119del p.Asn1706LeufsTer5 19949853 Spanish 1904
BRCA1 c.5266dup p.Gln1756ProfsTer74 21119707 European 1,800
BRCA1 c.676del p.Cys226ValfsTer8 26852130 Northeastern Italian 1,720
BRCA2 c.3036_3039del p.Ser1013IlefsTer29 9585613 North American 1,600
MSH2 c.1457_1460del p.Asn486fs 15042510 Southern Chinese 1,560
BRCA1 c.4035del p.Glu1346LysfsTer20 23274591 Baltic 1,550
BRCA1 c.3048_3052dup p.Asn1018MetfsTer8 11781691 Western Swedish 1500
BRCA1 c.68_69del p.Glu23ValfsTer17 26595274 Ashkenazi Jewish 1,500-750
BRCA1 c.548-?_4185 + ?del ex9-12del – 25716084 Mexican 1,440
BRCA1 c.815_824dup p.Thr276Alafs 32025337 Senegal 1,400
BRCA2 c.9310_9311del p.Lys3104ValfsTer6 19949853 Spanish 1,365
BRCA2 c.5146_5149del p.Tyr1716LysfsTer8 19949853 Spanish 1,200
BRCA1 c.5309G > T p.Gly1770Val 35216584 North African 800
BRCA1 c.1380dup p.Phe461IlefsTer19 18215206 Italian 750
BRCA1 c.3626del p.Lys1208_Leu1209insTer 11039575 Finnish 720–460
BRCA1 c.1016dup p.Val340GlyfsTer6 16509964 Norse, Dutch, Italian 600
BRCA1 c.1556del p.Lys519ArgfsTer13 11720839 Norwegian 600
BRCA2 c.5946del p.Ser1982ArgfsTer22 9585613 Ashkenazi Jewish 580
MSH6 c.10C > T p.Gln4Ter 25318681 French Canadian 543
BRCA1 c.697_698del p.Val233AsnfsTer4 11720840 Norwegian 500
BRCA1 c.2641G > T p.Glu881Ter 15146556 South African 500
BRCA2 c.771_775del p.Asn257LysfsTer17 8673089 Icelanders 500
MLH1 c.1865T > A p.Leu622His 20858721 Spanish 425
BRCA2 c.7480C > T p.Arg2494Ter 11039581 Finnish 400–200
BRCA1 c.5153-1G > A p.? 19912264 Spanish 380
BRCA2 c.755_758del p.Asp252ValfsTer24 9585613 North American/France 360
ATM c.6115G > A p.Glu2039Lys 38017116 Arab 325
MSH2 c.-823_1076 + 5984del – 14871915 North American 313
BRCA1 c.5212G > A p.Gly1738Arg 17902052 Greek 275
MSH2 c.2152C > T p.Gln718Ter 30968502 Portuguese 273
BRCA2 c.5771_5774del p.Ile1924fs 33643918 Southern African >250
BRCA2 c.7934del p.Arg2645Asnfs 33643918 Southern African >250
BRCA2 c.9118-2A > G p.? 11039580 Finnish 220–140
BRCA2 c.8327T > G p.Leu2776Ter 11039580 Finnish 220–140
BRCA1 c.4096+3A > G p.? 11039576 Finnish 200
BRCA1 c.2685_2686del p.Pro897LysfsTer5 15010701 Dutch 200
BRCA1 c.4097-2A > G – 11039575 Finnish <200
BRCA1 c.1175_1214del p.Leu392GlnfsTer5 8571953 Unknown 180

DDR, DNA damage repair; PVs, pathogenic variations.

Factors contributing to the rapid emergence of human DDR PVs

Population expansion

The rate of genetic variation in the human genome is rather fixed at 2.5 × 10−8 variation per nucleotide site per generation.73 It is estimated that there were only about few thousand individuals at the time of the latest human Out of Africa migration 50,000 to 60,000 years BP.74,75 Human population has experienced sustained growth since the Pleistocene–Holocene transition (11,000 years BP), continuing the expansion to its current size of more than 7 billion, due largely to the agricultural revolution initiated eight-thousand years ago76 and the industrial revolution initiated several centuries ago.77 Under the fixed mutation rate, the great expansion of the human population should largely increase the probability of DDR PV accumulation. Further, the bottleneck effects caused by the small number of Out-of-Africa migrants could also play an important role in enhancing the generation of DDR PVs following population expansion.78

Evolution selection

Evolution selection can also play a significant role in the arising of DDR PVs in the Out-of-Africa migrants and their descendants. DDR genes under positive selection harbor more PVs than those under negative selection (Fig. 6). For instance, human BRCA1 is under strong positive selection in reflecting its new function gained in regulating immunity,27 gene expression and metabolism,79 enhancing neural development80 and reproduction,81 besides its classical function in double-strand DNA break repair. BRCA1 PVs has high prevalence of 0.2%–0.5% in the human population, or one PV carrier in a few hundred individuals in modern humans.33, 34, 35, 36,82,83 The positive selection imposed in BRCA1 may favor BRCA1 variation, including PVs, for better fitness,24 although a trade-off for the PV carriers withhigher cancer risk at their post-reproduction stage.84,85

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Relationship between different types of evolution selection and the PV quantity in DDR genes. The box-and-whisker diagram shows the number of PVs per DDR gene under positive, neutral, and negative selection. The inset shows the bootstrap distribution of means (log2-transformed) for the positive selection (blue) and negative selection (green) groups (P = 0.035). DDR: DNA damage repair; PVs: pathogenic variations.

Incapable selection due to shorter arisen time

Most of DDR PVs arose over the past few thousand years. This is equivalent to a few hundreds of generations. The shorter arisen time of DDR PVs doesn't allow evolution selection to fully function by either fixing the PVs into the genome or eliminating the PVs from the genome.86,87 This is reflected by the fact that nearly all DDR PV carriers identified in modern humans were heterozygotic.87

It is necessary to indicate that the origins of DDR PVs can be very different from those of DDR benign variants (BVs), for which cross-species conservation may exist between humans and non-human species (Table 1).24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32

Certain limitations exist in our studies. For example, the first PV identified in ancient humans might not be the first PV arisen in ancient humans as older ancient humans were not available in current ancient human samples. Ancient genomic DNA often had lower quality, resulting in false PV calling or missed calling in ancient humans. In addition, certain PVs may not be inherited from ancient human to modern humans but may through spontaneous variation. The limited size of ancient humans may also limit the identification of DDR PVs in ancient humans. The data from Africans are limited that only two ancient Africans of Cameroon were present in the 5031 ancient humans and only 28,872 modern Africans were included in the study, far fewer than the 222,342 modern non-Africans. This could be related to the fact that DNA is hard to be preserved under natural conditions in Africa and the biased human genetics study towards Caucasian populations. More effects are needed to correct the bias for better understanding the nature of human genetics.

Conclusion

Our systematic study reveals that human DDR PVs are mainly originated from human evolutionary processes, particularly within the past few thousand years. The results highlight that the cancer risk predisposed by DDR PVs in modern humans is a by-product of human evolution.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Jiaheng Li: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Funding acquisition, Data curation. Bojin Zhao: Writing – review & editing, Data curation. Zixin Qin: Writing – review & editing, Data curation. Si Hoi Kou: Writing – review & editing, Data curation. Jia Sheng Chian: Writing – review & editing, Data curation. Fengxia Xiao: Writing – review & editing, Data curation. Huijun Lei: Writing – review & editing, Data curation. Stephanie Andaluz: Writing – review & editing, Data curation. Jun He: Writing – review & editing, Data curation. Siddharth Sinha: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. Xiaowei Mao: Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Resources, Supervision. San Ming Wang: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Funding acquisition, Data curation, Conceptualization, Supervision, Formal analysis.

Data availability

Our study used only the published and publicly available sequence data. All the variation data generated in our study are available at https://genemutation.boboz.io/dbddr-AncientHumans/.

Funding

The study was supported by the grants from the Macau Science and Technology Development Fund (China) (No. 085/2017/A2, 0077/2019/AMJ, 0032/2022/A1), the University of Macau (China) (No. SRG2017–00097-FHS, MYRG2019–00018-FHS, MYRG2020–00094-FHS), the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau (China) (No. FHSIG/SW/0007/2020P, MOE Frontiers Science Center for Precision Oncology pilot grant, and a startup fund) to S.M.W.; Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding (China) (No. CPB2025–B15) to J.L.; National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. T2322002), National Science and Technology Major Project of China (No. 2024ZD0523900) and the Sichuan Science and Technology Program (China) (No. 2024NSFTD0032, 2024ZYD0006, 2024NSFTD0032) to X.W.M.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no competing interests in the study.

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to the Information and Communication Technology Office of the University of Macau for providing the high-performance computing cluster resources and facilities for the study.

Footnotes

Peer review under the responsibility of Chongqing Medical University.

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gendis.2025.101916.

Contributor Information

Xiaowei Mao, Email: xiaowei.mao@uestc.edu.cn.

San Ming Wang, Email: sanmingwang@um.edu.mo.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following is the Supplementary data to this article:

Supplementary Table 1

List of 1,266 DDR PVs shared between modern humans and ancient humans.

mmc1.xlsx (165.9KB, xlsx)

References

  • 1.Jackson S.P., Bartek J. The DNA-Damage response in human biology and disease. Nature. 2009;461(7267):1071–1078. doi: 10.1038/nature08467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Huang R., Zhou P.K. DNA damage repair: historical perspectives, mechanistic pathways and clinical translation for targeted cancer therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6(1):254. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00648-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Richards S., Aziz N., Bale S., et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17(5):405–424. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Knudson AG Jr. Mutation and cancer: statistical study of retinoblastoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971;68(4):820–823. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.4.820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Garber J.E., Offit K. Hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(2):276–292. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.10.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jeggo P.A., Pearl L.H., Carr A.M. DNA repair, genome stability and cancer: a historical perspective. Nat Rev Cancer. 2016;16(1):35–42. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2015.4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wood R.D., Mitchell M., Lindahl T. Human DNA repair genes, 2005. Mutat Res. 2005;577(1–2):275–283. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Grzymski J.J., Elhanan G., Morales Rosado J.A., et al. Population genetic screening efficiently identifies carriers of autosomal dominant diseases. Nat Med. 2020;26(8):1235–1239. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0982-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chatterjee N., Walker G.C. Mechanisms of DNA damage, repair, and mutagenesis. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2017;58(5):235–263. doi: 10.1002/em.22087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Antoniou A., Pharoah P.D., Narod S., et al. Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case Series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72(5):1117–1130. doi: 10.1086/375033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chen S., Parmigiani G. Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(11):1329–1333. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.1066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kuchenbaecker K.B., Hopper J.L., Barnes D.R., et al. Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. JAMA. 2017;317(23):2402–2416. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lynch M. Rate, molecular spectrum, and consequences of human mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(3):961–968. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912629107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lynch H.T., Snyder C.L., Shaw T.G., Heinen C.D., Hitchins M.P. Milestones of Lynch syndrome: 1895–2015. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15(3):181–194. doi: 10.1038/nrc3878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Slade D. PARP and PARG inhibitors in cancer treatment. Genes Dev. 2020;34(5–6):360–394. doi: 10.1101/gad.334516.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.King M.C. “The race” to clone BRCA1. Science. 2014;343(6178):1462–1465. doi: 10.1126/science.1251900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Skolnick M.H., Frank T., Shattuck-Eidens D., Tavtigian S. Genetic susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer. Pathol Biol. 1997;45(3):245–249. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shiri-Sverdlov R., Oefner P., Green L., et al. Mutational analyses of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in Ashkenazi and non-Ashkenazi Jewish women with familial breast and ovarian cancer. Hum Mutat. 2000;16(6):491–501. doi: 10.1002/1098-1004(200012)16:6<491::AID-HUMU6>3.0.CO;2-J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Arver B., Du Q., Chen J., Luo L., Lindblom A. Hereditary breast cancer: a review. Semin Cancer Biol. 2000;10(4):271–288. doi: 10.1006/scbi.2000.0325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Landrum M.J., Lee J.M., Benson M., et al. ClinVar: public archive of interpretations of clinically relevant variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):D862–D868. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhao B., Li J., Sinha S., et al. Pathogenic variants in human DNA damage repair genes mostly arose in recent human history. BMC Cancer. 2024;24(1):415. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12160-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dobzhansky T. Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. Am Biol Teach. 1973;35(3):125–129. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Caulin A.F., Maley C.C. Peto's Paradox: evolution's prescription for cancer prevention. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011;26(4):175–182. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Huttley G.A., Easteal S., Southey M.C., et al. Adaptive evolution of the tumour suppressor BRCA1 in humans and chimpanzees. Australian Breast Cancer family study. Nat Genet. 2000;25(4):410–413. doi: 10.1038/78092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fleming M.A., Potter J.D., Ramirez C.J., Ostrander G.K., Ostrander E.A. Understanding missense mutations in the BRCA1 gene: an evolutionary approach. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(3):1151–1156. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0237285100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Burk-Herrick A., Scally M., Amrine-Madsen H., Stanhope M.J., Springer M.S. Natural selection and mammalian BRCA1 sequences: elucidating functionally important sites relevant to breast cancer susceptibility in humans. Mamm Genome. 2006;17(3):257–270. doi: 10.1007/s00335-005-0067-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lou D.I., McBee R.M., Le U.Q., et al. Rapid evolution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in humans and other Primates. BMC Evol Biol. 2014;14:155. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-14-155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jiang S., Lin T., Xie Q., Wang L. Network analysis of RAD51 proteins in Metazoa and the evolutionary relationships with their archaeal homologs. Front Genet. 2018;9:383. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Siraj A.K., Bu R., Iqbal K., et al. POLE and POLD1 germline exonuclease domain pathogenic variants, a rare event in colorectal cancer from the Middle East. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020;8(8) doi: 10.1002/mgg3.1368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rabie E., Amr K., Zada S., El-Sayed H., El Darouti M., El-Kamah G. Clinical and mutational spectrum of Xeroderma pigmentosum in Egypt: identification of six novel mutations and implications for ancestral origins. Genes. 2021;12(2):295. doi: 10.3390/genes12020295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yang C., Xiang E., Chen P., Fang X. Evolutionary history of adenomas to colorectal cancer in FAP families. Front Genet. 2024;15 doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1391851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lyu Y., Wang F., Cheng H., et al. Recent selection and introgression facilitated high-altitude adaptation in cattle. Sci Bull (Beijing) 2024;69(21):3415–3424. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2024.05.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bhaskaran S.P., Chandratre K., Gupta H., et al. Germline variation in BRCA1/2 is highly ethnic-specific: evidence from over 30, 000 Chinese hereditary breast and ovarian cancer patients. Int J Cancer. 2019;145(4):962–973. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dong H., Chandratre K., Qin Y., et al. Prevalence of BRCA1/BRCA2 pathogenic variation in Chinese Han population. J Med Genet. 2021;58(8):565–569. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-106970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Qin Z., Kuok C.N., Dong H., et al. Can population BRCA screening be applied in non-Ashkenazi Jewish populations? Experience in Macau population. J Med Genet. 2021;58(9):587–591. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chian J.S., Li J., Wang S.M. Evolutionary origin of human PALB2 germline pathogenic variants. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(14) doi: 10.3390/ijms241411343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Li J., Zhao B., Huang T., Qin Z., Wang S.M. Human BRCA pathogenic variants were originated during recent human history. Life Sci Alliance. 2022;5(5) doi: 10.26508/lsa.202101263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kou S.H., Li J., Tam B., et al. TP53 germline pathogenic variants in modern humans were likely originated during recent human history. NAR Cancer. 2023;5(3) doi: 10.1093/narcan/zcad025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Xiao F., Li J., Lagniton P.N.P., et al. Evolutionary origin of MUTYH germline pathogenic variations in modern humans. Biomolecules. 2023;13(3):429. doi: 10.3390/biom13030429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lei H., Li J., Zhao B., et al. Evolutionary origin of germline pathogenic variants in human DNA mismatch repair genes. Hum Genom. 2024;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40246-024-00573-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Qin Z., Huang T., Guo M., Wang S.M. Distinct landscapes of deleterious variants in DNA damage repair system in ethnic human populations. Life Sci Alliance. 2022;5(9) doi: 10.26508/lsa.202101319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.He J., Kou S.H., Li J., Ding X., Wang S.M. Pathogenic variants in human DNA damage repair genes mostly arose after the latest human out-of-Africa migration. Front Genet. 2024;15 doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1408952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Andaluz S., Zhao B., Sinha S., et al. Using Portuguese BRCA pathogenic variation as a model to study the impact of human admixture on human health. BMC Genom. 2024;25(1):416. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10311-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Alföldi J., Lindblad-Toh K. Comparative genomics as a tool to understand evolution and disease. Genome Res. 2013;23(7):1063–1068. doi: 10.1101/gr.157503.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.O'Bleness M., Searles V.B., Varki A., Gagneux P., Sikela J.M. Evolution of genetic and genomic features unique to the human lineage. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13(12):853–866. doi: 10.1038/nrg3336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Keinan A., Clark A.G. Recent explosive human population growth has resulted in an excess of rare genetic variants. Science. 2012;336(6082):740–743. doi: 10.1126/science.1217283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Harding R.M., Fullerton S.M., Griffiths R.C., et al. Archaic African and Asian lineages in the genetic ancestry of modern humans. Am J Hum Genet. 1997;60(4):772–789. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ho S. The molecular clock and estimating species divergence. Nat Edu. 2008;1(1):168. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Skoglund P., Mathieson I. Ancient genomics of modern humans: the first decade. Annu Rev Genom Hum Genet. 2018;19:381–404. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-083117-021749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mallick S., Micco A., Mah M., et al. The Allen Ancient DNA Resource (AADR) a curated compendium of ancient human genomes. Sci Data. 2024;11(1):182. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03031-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Long J. Who we are and how we got here: ancient DNA and the new science of the human past, by David Reich. Hum Biol. 2017;89(4):303–304. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zink A., Wann L.S., Thompson R.C., et al. Genomic correlates of atherosclerosis in ancient humans. Glob Heart. 2014;9(2):203–209. doi: 10.1016/j.gheart.2014.03.2453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Huerta-Sánchez E., Jin X., Asan, et al. Altitude adaptation in tibetans caused by introgression of Denisovan-like DNA. Nature. 2014;512(7513):194–197. doi: 10.1038/nature13408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hu H., Petousi N., Glusman G., et al. Evolutionary history of Tibetans inferred from whole-genome sequencing. PLoS Genet. 2017;13(4) doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zeberg H., Pääbo S. The major genetic risk factor for severe COVID-19 is inherited from Neanderthals. Nature. 2020;587(7835):610–612. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2818-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ågren R., Patil S., Zhou X., et al. Major genetic risk factors for dupuytren's disease are inherited from neandertals. Mol Biol Evol. 2023;40(6):msad130. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msad130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Pääbo S. Ancient DNA: extraction, characterization, molecular cloning, and enzymatic amplification. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86(6):1939–1943. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.6.1939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Hawks J. Significance of Neandertal and Denisovan genomes in human evolution. Annu Rev Anthropol. 2013;42(1):433–449. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Sankararaman S., Mallick S., Dannemann M., et al. The genomic landscape of Neanderthal ancestry in present-day humans. Nature. 2014;507(7492):354–357. doi: 10.1038/nature12961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Dannemann M., Kelso J. The contribution of neanderthals to phenotypic variation in modern humans. Am J Hum Genet. 2017;101(4):578–589. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Zeberg H., Jakobsson M., Pääbo S. The genetic changes that shaped Neandertals, Denisovans, and modern humans. Cell. 2024;187(5):1047–1058. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.12.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Harris K., Nielsen R. The genetic cost of Neanderthal introgression. Genetics. 2016;203(2):881–891. doi: 10.1534/genetics.116.186890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Schlebusch C.M., Jakobsson M. Tales of human migration, admixture, and selection in Africa. Annu Rev Genom Hum Genet. 2018;19:405–428. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-083117-021759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Antinossi C. 2009. Estudo Descobre 31,19 milhões de portugueses pelo mundo.https://web.archive.org/web/20141028023159/https://www.dn.pt/inicio/portugal/interior.aspx.content_id=11926.98 [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Gabriel S.B., Schaffner S.F., Nguyen H., et al. The structure of haplotype blocks in the human genome. Science. 2002;296(5576):2225–2229. doi: 10.1126/science.1069424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hamel N., Feng B.J., Foretova L., et al. On the origin and diffusion of BRCA1 c.5266dupC (5382insC) in European populations. Eur J Hum Genet. 2011;19(3):300–306. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Neuhausen S.L., Godwin A.K., Gershoni-Baruch R., et al. Haplotype and phenotype analysis of nine recurrent BRCA2 mutations in 111 families: results of an international study. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62(6):1381–1388. doi: 10.1086/301885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Zeegers M.P., van Poppel F., Vlietinck R., Spruijt L., Ostrer H. Founder mutations among the Dutch. Eur J Hum Genet. 2004;12(7):591–600. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Janavičius R., Rudaitis V., Feng B.J., et al. Haplotype analysis and ancient origin of the BRCA1 c.4035delA Baltic founder mutation. Eur J Med Genet. 2013;56(3):125–130. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2012.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Thorlacius S., Olafsdottir G., Tryggvadottir L., et al. A single BRCA2 mutation in male and female breast cancer families from Iceland with varied cancer phenotypes. Nat Genet. 1996;13(1):117–119. doi: 10.1038/ng0596-117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Sarantaus L., Huusko P., Eerola H., et al. Multiple founder effects and geographical clustering of BRCA1 and BRCA2 families in Finland. Eur J Hum Genet. 2000;8(10):757–763. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Giacomazzi J., Correia R.L., Palmero E.I., et al. The Brazilian founder mutation TP53 p.R337H is uncommon in Portuguese women diagnosed with breast cancer. Breast J. 2014;20(5):534–536. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Nachman M.W., Crowell S.L. Estimate of the mutation rate per nucleotide in humans. Genetics. 2000;156(1):297–304. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.1.297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Liu H., Prugnolle F., Manica A., Balloux F. A geographically explicit genetic model of worldwide human-settlement history. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;79(2):230–237. doi: 10.1086/505436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Zhivotovsky L.A., Rosenberg N.A., Feldman M.W. Features of evolution and expansion of modern humans, inferred from genomewide microsatellite markers. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72(5):1171–1186. doi: 10.1086/375120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Gignoux C.R., Henn B.M., Mountain J.L. Rapid, global demographic expansions after the origins of agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(15):6044–6049. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914274108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Kumar Krishan. 2024. "Modernization". Encyclopedia Britannica.https://www.britannica.com/topic/modernization [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Lachance J., Berens A.J., Hansen M.E.B., Teng A.K., Tishkoff S.A., Rebbeck T.R. Genetic hitchhiking and population bottlenecks contribute to prostate cancer disparities in men of African descent. Cancer Res. 2018;78(9):2432–2443. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-1550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Rosen E.M., Fan S., Ma Y. BRCA1 regulation of transcription. Cancer Lett. 2006;236(2):175–185. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2005.04.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Pao G.M., Zhu Q., Perez-Garcia C.G., et al. Role of BRCA1 in brain development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(13):E1240–E1248. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1400783111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Smith K.R., Hanson H.A., Hollingshaus M.S. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and female fertility. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2013;25(3):207–213. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32835f1731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Reich D.E., Lander E.S. On the allelic spectrum of human disease. Trends Genet. 2001;17(9):502–510. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(01)02410-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Maxwell K.N., Domchek S.M., Nathanson K.L., Robson M.E. Population frequency of germline BRCA1/2 mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(34):4183–4185. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.0554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Benton M.L., Abraham A., LaBella A.L., Abbot P., Rokas A., Capra J.A. The influence of evolutionary history on human health and disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2021;22(5):269–283. doi: 10.1038/s41576-020-00305-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Jacqueline C., Biro P.A., Beckmann C., et al. Cancer: a disease at the crossroads of trade-offs. Evol Appl. 2016;10(3):215–225. doi: 10.1111/eva.12444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Simons Y.B., Turchin M.C., Pritchard J.K., Sella G. The deleterious mutation load is insensitive to recent population history. Nat Genet. 2014;46(3):220–224. doi: 10.1038/ng.2896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Seo A., Steinberg-Shemer O., Unal S., et al. Mechanism for survival of homozygous nonsense mutations in the tumor suppressor gene BRCA1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(20):5241–5246. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1801796115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table 1

List of 1,266 DDR PVs shared between modern humans and ancient humans.

mmc1.xlsx (165.9KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

Our study used only the published and publicly available sequence data. All the variation data generated in our study are available at https://genemutation.boboz.io/dbddr-AncientHumans/.


Articles from Genes & Diseases are provided here courtesy of Chongqing Medical University

RESOURCES