Re: Intel XNU bug report
Re: Intel XNU bug report
- Subject: Re: Intel XNU bug report
- From: Kevin Van Vechten <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 13:10:34 -0700
On Aug 9, 2006, at 1:02 PM, Graham J Lee wrote:
On 9 Aug 2006, at 12:53, Chad Leigh wrote:
Would be nice if Darwin/Apple etc used a name that is already in
use by others so a to not offer more confusion.
how about EM64T, or "washing machine controller chip with a few
extensions"? Seriously, AMD invented this stuff and they call it
x86-64, so I think that's a reasonable decision and already in
use. i38664 would have been wrong. NetBSD, RedHat/Fedora/Centos
use x86_64.
The kernel and developer tools have standardized on "x86_64" for the
name of the Mach-O architecture. Using x86_64 is probably the most
straightforward way to describe 64-bit on Intel as supported by Mac
OS X.
- Kevin
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
