Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Multinational subsidiary knowledge protection - Do mandates and clusters matter?

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

35 Citations (Scopus)
61 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

International knowledge spillovers, especially through multinational companies (MNCs), have recently been a major topic of academic and management debate. However, most studies treat MNC subsidiaries as relatively passive actors. We challenge this assumption by investigating the drivers of knowledge protection intensity of MNC subsidiaries. We argue that knowledge protection intensity is determined by MNC subsidiary mandates and by opportunities and risks originating from the host region. We hypothesize that not just competence-creating but also competence-exploiting mandates increase knowledge protection intensity. In addition, technological cluster regions in the host country can be expected to provide opportunities for knowledge sourcing and MNC subsidiaries may be willing to protect knowledge less intensively to participate in cluster networks. We test our hypotheses using a dataset of 694 observations of 631 MNC subsidiaries in Germany and develop recommendations for research, managers and policy makers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1320-1333
Number of pages14
JournalResearch Policy
Volume43
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct-2014

Keywords

  • Knowledge protection
  • Multinational companies
  • patenting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Multinational subsidiary knowledge protection - Do mandates and clusters matter?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this