Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 5;7(3):641-653.
doi: 10.1021/acsptsci.3c00192. eCollection 2024 Mar 8.

Comparative Pharmacological Effects of Lisuride and Lysergic Acid Diethylamide Revisited

Affiliations

Comparative Pharmacological Effects of Lisuride and Lysergic Acid Diethylamide Revisited

Grant C Glatfelter et al. ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. .

Abstract

Lisuride is a non-psychedelic serotonin (5-HT) 2A receptor (5-HT2A) agonist and analogue of the psychedelic lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD). Lisuride also acts as an agonist at the serotonin 1A receptor (5-HT1A), a property known to counter psychedelic effects. Here, we tested whether lisuride lacks psychedelic activity due to a dual mechanism: (1) partial agonism at 5-HT2A and (2) potent agonism at 5-HT1A. The in vitro effects of lisuride, LSD, and related analogues on 5-HT2A signaling were characterized by using miniGαq and β-arrestin 2 recruitment assays. The 5-HT1A- and 5-HT2A-mediated effects of lisuride and LSD were also compared in male C57BL/6J mice. The in vitro results confirmed that LSD is an agonist at 5-HT2A, with high efficacy and potency for recruiting miniGαq and β-arrestin 2. By contrast, lisuride displayed partial efficacy for both functional end points (6-52% of 5-HT or LSD Emax) and antagonized the effects of LSD. The mouse experiments demonstrated that LSD induces head twitch responses (HTRs)(ED50 = 0.039 mg/kg), while lisuride suppresses HTRs (ED50 = 0.006 mg/kg). Lisuride also produced potent hypothermia and hypolocomotion (ED50 = 0.008-0.023 mg/kg) that was blocked by the 5-HT1A antagonist WAY100635 (3 mg/kg). Blockade of 5-HT1A prior to lisuride restored basal HTRs, but it failed to increase HTRs above baseline levels. HTRs induced by LSD were blocked by lisuride (0.03 mg/kg) or the 5-HT1A agonist 8-OH-DPAT (1 mg/kg). Overall, our findings show that lisuride is an ultrapotent 5-HT1A agonist in C57BL/6J mice, limiting its use as a 5-HT2A ligand in mouse studies examining acute drug effects. Results also indicate that the 5-HT2A partial agonist-antagonist activity of lisuride explains its lack of psychedelic effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Chemical structures of lisuride and LSD (A) and heatmap of functional parameters for each of the tested substances in both assay formats. (B) EC50 values for in vitro functional potency in βarr2 and miniGαq assays as well as Emax values relative to the Emax of LSD (C) and serotonin (D, 5-HT), which were arbitrarily defined as 100%. Darker colors indicate higher potencies (lower EC50 values) and efficacies. Data are from at least three biologically independent experiments, each performed in duplicate.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A,B) Concentration–response curves for effects of lisuride (A) and LSD (B) in 5-HT2Ain vitro recruitment assays. (C, D) Effects of lisuride on the functional activity of LSD for 5-HT2A-mediated β-arrestin 2 (C) and miniGαq (D) recruitment assays. Concentration–response curves for cells that were preincubated for 5 min with either lisuride or a corresponding solvent control, after which a concentration range of LSD (green curve), 100 nM LSD (purple curve), or the corresponding solvent control (blue curve) was added. Data in all panels are the mean ± SEM of three biologically independent experiments, each performed in duplicate, and normalized relative to the Emax of LSD. LIS = lisuride.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Acute dose-related effects of lisuride and LSD in mice. Dose–response curves for lisuride (A–C) and LSD (D–F) were obtained for effects on HTR, body temperature, and distance traveled over the 30 min session. All values are the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of n = 5–7.* = p < 0.05 vs vehicle control (0 mg/kg). More details regarding the pharmacological parameters determined and statistical comparisons made can be found in the Materials and Methods section and Tables 1 and S1.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effects of WAY100635 pretreatment on acute effects of lisuride (A–C) and LSD (D–F). All data are mean with SEM (n = 5) and individual points plotted for total HTR count, body temperature change, and distance traveled. Bold points and symbols represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) via Tukey’s post-test as follows: *vs 0/0, # vs 3/0, ∧ vs 0/lisuride or LSD, + vs 3/lisuride or LSD. More details regarding statistical comparisons can be found in the Materials and Methods section and Tables S3 and S4.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Effects of M100907 (A, structure shown), lisuride (B), and 8-OH-DPAT (C, structure shown) pretreatment on LSD-induced HTR. Data shown are mean with SEM (n = 6–8) and individual points plotted for total HTR count. Bold points and symbols represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) via Tukey’s post-test as follows: *vs 0/0, # vs pretreatment/0, ∧ vs 0/LSD, + vs pretreatment/LSD. More details regarding statistical comparisons can be found in the Materials and Methods section and Tables S5 and S6.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Effects of blockade of various non-5-HT2A receptor targets of lisuride on the HTR. Effects of SCH23390 (A), eticlopride (B), SCH23390 + eticlopride (C), SB242084 (D), SB242084 + WAY100635 (E), and WAY100635 + eticlopride + SCH23390 (F) pretreatment on lisuride-induced reductions in basal HTR. Data shown are mean with SEM (n = 4–6) and individual points plotted for total HTR count. Symbols and bold points represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) via Tukey’s post-test as follows: *vs 0/0, # vs pretreatment/0, ∧ vs 0/lisuride, + vs pretreatment/lisuride. More details regarding statistical comparisons can be found in the Materials and Methods section and Tables S7–S10.

References

    1. Herrmann W. M.; Horowski R.; Dannehl K.; Kramer U.; Lurati K. Clinical Effectiveness of Lisuride Hydrogen Maleate: A Double-Blind Trial Versus Methysergide. Headache: J. Head Face Pain 1977, 17, 54–60. 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1977.hed1702054.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. González-Maeso J.; Weisstaub N. V.; Zhou M.; Chan P.; Ivic L.; Ang R.; Lira A.; Bradley-Moore M.; Ge Y.; Zhou Q.; Sealfon S. C.; Gingrich J. A. Hallucinogens Recruit Specific Cortical 5-HT2A Receptor-Mediated Signaling Pathways to Affect Behavior. Neuron 2007, 53, 439–452. 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.01.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Halberstadt A. L.; Geyer M. A. Characterization of the head-twitch response induced by hallucinogens in mice: detection of the behavior based on the dynamics of head movement. Psychopharmacology 2013, 227, 727–739. 10.1007/s00213-013-3006-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Horowski R. Psychiatric side-effects of high-dose lisuride therapy in parkinsonism. Lancet 1986, 328, 510 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90374-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Egan C. T.; Herrick-Davis K.; Miller K.; Glennon R. A.; Teitler M. Agonist activity of LSD and lisuride at cloned 5HT2A and 5HT2C receptors. Psychopharmacology 1998, 136, 409–414. 10.1007/s002130050585. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources