Skip to main content
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 1972 Summer;5(2):183–190. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1972.5-183

Stimulus factors in the training of prepositional usage in three autistic children

Wayne Sailor 1, Trudie Taman 1
PMCID: PMC1310749  PMID: 16795338

Abstract

Language deficient, autistic children were trained to use the prepositions “in” and “on”. Three subjects were exposed to conditions of training that differed in the method of employment of stimulus objects used to train prepositional usage. Two subjects were trained first with “ambiguous” stimuli, that is, the same stimulus objects were used for training both prepositions. The two subjects were then switched to a training condition with “non-ambiguous” stimulus objects, that is, objects used for training “in” were different than those used for training “on”. The two subjects were then switched to the ambiguous stimulus condition and finally returned again to training with non-ambiguous stimuli (four conditions). A third subject began with training on non-ambiguous stimuli, was switched to an ambiguous condition and was then switched back to non-ambiguous stimuli (three conditions). The results for two of the three subjects indicated that accurate usage of the two prepositions was obtained only under training conditions with non-ambiguous stimuli. Results for the third subject suggested that initial training with non-ambiguous stimuli might enhance subsequent accurate responding with ambiguous stimuli.

Full text

PDF
183

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Guess D. A functional analysis of receptive language and productive speech: acquisition of the plural morpheme. J Appl Behav Anal. 1969 Spring;2(1):55–64. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1969.2-55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Guess D., Sailor W., Rutherford G., Baer D. M. An experimental analysis of linguistic development: the productive use of the plural morpheme. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Winter;1(4):297–306. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hewett F. M. Teaching speech to an autistic child through operant conditioning. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1965 Oct;35(5):927–936. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1965.tb00472.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Schumaker J., Sherman J. A. Training generative verb usage by imitation and reinforcement procedures. J Appl Behav Anal. 1970 Winter;3(4):273–287. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1970.3-273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ward A. J. Early infantile autism: diagnosis, etiology, and treatment. Psychol Bull. 1970 May;73(5):350–362. doi: 10.1037/h0029233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wheeler A. J., Sulzer B. Operant training and generalization of a verbal response form in a speech-deficient child. J Appl Behav Anal. 1970 Summer;3(2):139–147. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1970.3-139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES