You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Interesting research into your "disparity circle" formula along with a new, smoother one #22
I was chatting in my Discord with Aphitorite on GitHub, and they actually dug into your "disparity curve" formula a bit. Some interesting stuff was discovered, and we wanted to share it with you!
So first of all, we were talking about my modified version of your formula from my fork that's able to handle arbitrary array lengths, which is the following:
Yeah, I know... I didn't refactor it after changing it around, and the line of code it takes up is an absolute mess. But it turns out that you had written up a partial triangle wave function (without using trig functions)!
changed the title [-]Interesting Research into your Disparity Circle formula and a New, Smoother One[/-][+]Interesting research into your "disparity circle" formula along with a new, smoother one[/+]on Jul 16, 2020
Activity
[-]Interesting Research into your Disparity Circle formula and a New, Smoother One[/-][+]Interesting research into your "disparity circle" formula along with a new, smoother one[/+]MusicTheorist commentedon Jul 16, 2020
Update: Aphitorite cleaned up the original formula (triangle wave) as well...